Patent 113299973
PTAB challenges
AIA trial proceedings at the USPTO Patent Trial and Appeal Board — IPR, PGR, and CBM. Petitioners, judge panels, claim-level invalidation outcomes from Final Written Decisions, and Federal Circuit appeals. The single most important defensive datapoint after litigation history.
Active provider: Google · gemini-2.5-flash
Proceedings on file (0)
All PTAB activity →AIA trial proceedings (IPR / PGR / CBM) filed at the USPTO Patent Trial and Appeal Board against this patent. Sourced from the USPTO Open Data Portal and refreshed every six hours; each proceeding number deep-links to the PTAB E2E docket.
Current assignee: Cortex MCP, Inc.
No PTAB proceedings on file. This patent has not been challenged via IPR, PGR, or CBM. The absence is itself a signal — well-asserted patents eventually attract IPRs. The LLM analysis below may surface filings the ODP feed hasn’t indexed yet.
PTAB challenges
AIA trial proceedings at the USPTO Patent Trial and Appeal Board — IPR, PGR, and CBM. Petitioners, judge panels, claim-level invalidation outcomes from Final Written Decisions, and Federal Circuit appeals. The single most important defensive datapoint after litigation history.
Proceedings overview
There are no AIA trial proceedings on file for US patent 113299973.
Strategic summary
As of 2026-07-04, there is no public record of any Inter Partes Review (IPR), Post-Grant Review (PGR), or Covered Business Method (CBM) patent trial proceedings having been filed against US Patent 113299973. This means that all claims of the patent remain untested by the PTAB. There is no estoppel landscape established through AIA trials, as no petitioner has challenged the patent before the PTAB.
The absence of PTAB activity indicates that, thus far, the patent has not been subjected to the types of validity challenges commonly seen in modern patent litigation. This can be interpreted in a few ways: either the patent has not yet been extensively asserted, potential challengers have deemed the patent sufficiently robust to avoid an IPR, or the technology covered by the patent is not currently of significant commercial interest to warrant a challenge.
Recommended next steps
Since no PTAB activity exists for US Patent 113299973, the following steps are recommended for a defendant facing assertion of this patent:
- Conduct a thorough prior art search: Without any PTAB proceedings, all claims of the patent are considered "untested." A defendant should perform an independent and comprehensive prior art search to identify potential invalidity grounds under 35 U.S.C. §§ 102 and 103 that could be asserted in a future PTAB petition or district court litigation.
- Evaluate filing an IPR/PGR petition: If strong prior art is found, consider filing an IPR (for patents based on prior art patents or printed publications) or PGR (if the patent is eligible and the one-year window from grant or reissue has not passed, allowing for broader grounds including § 101 and § 112 challenges). The absence of prior proceedings means a new petitioner would not face estoppel under 35 U.S.C. § 315(e)(2).
- Monitor for future PTAB filings: Continuously monitor USPTO PTAB databases (like P-TACTS or the Open Data Portal) for any newly filed petitions against this patent. The absence of current activity is a signal, but well-asserted patents often eventually attract IPRs.
- Assess claim scope: Carefully analyze the claims of US Patent 113299973 in light of the discovered prior art and the alleged infringing product or service. The direct claims and specification could not be retrieved in the initial web search, which is a critical piece of information for any invalidity analysis. This would be the absolute first step in a real-world scenario.
Generated 7/4/2026, 12:45:26 AM