- Filed
- Oct 23, 2026
- Last modified
- Oct 23, 2026
- Petitioner
- SAP America, Inc. et al.
- Inventor
- Martin KLENK et al
Invalidity dossier
US 11256708
Added 10/24/2026, 4:00:19 AM
Active provider: DeepSeek · deepseek-flash
Patent summary
Title, assignee, inventors, filing/issue dates, abstract, and a plain-language overview of the claims.
Patent Overview — US11256708B2
Title: Method of creating process protocols
Patent number / application: US11256708B2; application US16/256,380
Inventors: Martin Klenk; Alexander Rinke
Assignee (as listed): Celonis SE
Key dates (as listed): Priority/filing date 2019-01-24; publication of application US20200242114A1 on 2020-07-30; grant/publication of US11256708B2 on 2022-02-22.
Purpose and plain-language scope (per the supplied text):
The invention "relates to a method of creating process protocols, wherein the data for which the process protocols are to be created, is stored in a distributed IT infrastructure, i.e., on different computer systems." The problem described is that real processes (business processes such as an order process, or technical processes such as a coating process) may span multiple computer systems, with each system storing only its own partial-process data. Analyzing each system separately is possible under the prior art, but "an analysis of the overall process, thereby, is not possible."
The described solution is a computer-implemented method, in a local computer system having a processor and a storage device, that:
- imports selected data tables from multiple external computer systems (e.g., a first and a second external system);
- reconstructs relationships between the imported tables, including determining the attributes by which tables relate (e.g., identical or similar attribute names such as "Customer" and "Customer Number"/"Customer No.");
- determines and selects a first data table meeting one or more conditions, and selects second data tables related to it;
- stores information about the selected second tables and their relationships to the first table; and
- creates an executable transformation in which data sets are read from the first and second tables using determined attributes and stored as a process protocol, where "each data set stored in the process protocol represents a process step (a process step represents an event of a process)" of a process executed across the external systems.
The data structure of the stored protocol is described as "predetermined" and comprising at least certain elements, but those elements are not included in the excerpt.
Source: https://patents.google.com/patent/[US11256708](/patent/US11256708)/en
What the excerpt does not establish:
The supplied text is an excerpt and omits the claims and much of the specification (the listed data-structure elements, conditions, and full step details are cut off). It therefore does not establish the exact claim scope, the full list of conditions or protocol fields, embodiments, or the complete prosecution history. Consistent with instructions, no litigation, ownership-transfer, validity, or prior-art findings are addressed here.
Generated 10/24/2026, 4:00:48 AM
Cases on file (0)
Specific litigation cases in our database that name US patent 11256708. The free-form analysis below may also discuss cases beyond this list.
No cases on file mention this patent. Upload a CSV or add a case manually in Admin → Manage litigation cases.
Litigation summary
Past and pending lawsuits — plaintiffs, defendants, jurisdictions, outcomes, and notable rulings.
Proceedings on file (1)
All PTAB activity →AIA trial proceedings (IPR / PGR / CBM) filed at the USPTO Patent Trial and Appeal Board against this patent. Sourced from the USPTO Open Data Portal and refreshed every six hours; each proceeding number deep-links to the PTAB E2E docket.
PTAB challenges
AIA trial proceedings at the USPTO Patent Trial and Appeal Board — IPR, PGR, and CBM. Petitioners, judge panels, claim-level invalidation outcomes from Final Written Decisions, and Federal Circuit appeals. The single most important defensive datapoint after litigation history.
Assignment history
Inventors, original assignee, and the chain of ownership recorded with the USPTO — including the correspondent attorney who recorded each assignment, since shell-LLC chains often share one repeat-player attorney even when the entity names look unrelated. Surfaces NPE / patent-troll patterns: shell-entity transfers, known asserters in the chain, repeat correspondent fingerprints, pre-litigation assignments, and bankruptcy fire-sales.
Prior art
Earlier patents, publications, and products that may anticipate or render the claims unpatentable.
Obviousness
Combinations of prior art that suggest the claimed invention would have been obvious under 35 U.S.C. § 103.
Extensions
Patent term adjustments, term extensions, continuations, divisionals, family members, and expiration dates.
Derivative works
Defensive disclosure: derivative variations of each claim designed to render future incremental improvements obvious or non-novel.