- Filed
- Oct 14, 2026
- Last modified
- Oct 14, 2026
- Petitioner
- Treace Medical Concepts, Inc.
- Inventor
- Matthew P. Gephart
Invalidity dossier
US 10932833
Added 10/15/2026, 12:00:11 AM
Active provider: DeepSeek · deepseek-flash
Patent summary
Title, assignee, inventors, filing/issue dates, abstract, and a plain-language overview of the claims.
Patent Overview — US10932833B2
Title: Bone compression device and method
Patent number: US10932833B2
Application number: US16/164,899
Inventor: Matthew P. Gephart
Original assignee: Pioneer Surgical Technology Inc
Current assignee (as listed): RTI Surgical Inc; Paragon 28 Inc — the source notes the listed assignees "may be inaccurate" and that Google performed no analysis or warranty as to the list.
Key dates:
- Priority date: 2015-03-03 (stated as an assumption, not a legal conclusion)
- Filing date: 2018-10-19
- Publication of US20190046247A1: 2019-02-14
- Publication/grant of US10932833B2: 2021-03-02
- Legal status: Active; adjusted expiration 2036-09-04 (legal status given as an assumption, not a legal conclusion)
Purpose and plain-language scope: The title identifies the subject matter as a bone compression device and associated method. The prior-art keywords supplied are "configuration," "bone," "receiving portions," "anchor receiving," and "bone anchor," indicating the device involves receiving portions configured to receive bone anchors. The classification A61B17/80 places it among cortical plates (bone plates) and instruments for holding, positioning, or compressing bones attached to cortical plates, and subclass A61B17/808 covers instruments for holding or positioning bone plates or adjusting screw-to-plate locking mechanisms. Related classifications include A61B17/17 (guides or aligning means for drills, mills, pins or wires) and A61B17/1728 (such guides for holes). In plain terms, the patent concerns a device for compressing bone, apparently using bone anchors and receiving portions.
What the excerpt does not establish: The supplied text contains no claims, no abstract, no detailed description, and no drawings content. It therefore does not establish the specific structure, dimensions, materials, or the number and wording of claims; nor does it establish the method steps. The classifications and keywords are indexing data, not claim language. No statement is made here about litigation, ownership transfers, validity, or prior art, per scope.
Source: https://patents.google.com/patent/[US10932833](/patent/US10932833)/en
Generated 10/15/2026, 12:00:50 AM
Cases on file (0)
Specific litigation cases in our database that name US patent 10932833. The free-form analysis below may also discuss cases beyond this list.
No cases on file mention this patent. Upload a CSV or add a case manually in Admin → Manage litigation cases.
Litigation summary
Past and pending lawsuits — plaintiffs, defendants, jurisdictions, outcomes, and notable rulings.
Proceedings on file (1)
All PTAB activity →AIA trial proceedings (IPR / PGR / CBM) filed at the USPTO Patent Trial and Appeal Board against this patent. Sourced from the USPTO Open Data Portal and refreshed every six hours; each proceeding number deep-links to the PTAB E2E docket.
PTAB challenges
AIA trial proceedings at the USPTO Patent Trial and Appeal Board — IPR, PGR, and CBM. Petitioners, judge panels, claim-level invalidation outcomes from Final Written Decisions, and Federal Circuit appeals. The single most important defensive datapoint after litigation history.
Assignment history
Inventors, original assignee, and the chain of ownership recorded with the USPTO — including the correspondent attorney who recorded each assignment, since shell-LLC chains often share one repeat-player attorney even when the entity names look unrelated. Surfaces NPE / patent-troll patterns: shell-entity transfers, known asserters in the chain, repeat correspondent fingerprints, pre-litigation assignments, and bankruptcy fire-sales.
Prior art
Earlier patents, publications, and products that may anticipate or render the claims unpatentable.
Obviousness
Combinations of prior art that suggest the claimed invention would have been obvious under 35 U.S.C. § 103.
Extensions
Patent term adjustments, term extensions, continuations, divisionals, family members, and expiration dates.
Derivative works
Defensive disclosure: derivative variations of each claim designed to render future incremental improvements obvious or non-novel.