US 10917272

US Patent 10,917,272: Variable Header Repetition in Wireless OFDM Networks

Title: Non-transitory computer-readable information storage media for variable header repetition in a wireless OFDM network

Assignee: AX Wireless LLC (Current Assignee), Applied Transform LLC (Original Assignee)

Inventors: Joon Bae KIM, Marcos C. Tzannes

Filing Date: February 3, 2020

Issue Date: February 9, 2021

Abstract:
A non-transitory computer-readable information storage media for use within a wireless Orthogonal Frequency Division Multiplexing (OFDM) network that causes the transmission or reception of two packet types. The first packet type includes a header field with two distinct parts, each comprising a different set of header bits. These two parts are transmitted or received using two OFDM symbols. The second packet type features a header field with four parts. In this second type, the first and second parts contain the same first set of header bits, and the third and fourth parts contain the same second set of header bits. These four parts of the header field are transmitted or received using four OFDM symbols. The second packet type is designed to offer more reliable transmission or reception compared to the first packet type.

---

Plain-Language Overview of Independent Claims:

US Patent 10,917,272 contains two independent claims: Claim 1 (directed to a method of transmission) and Claim 11 (directed to a method of reception).

Independent Claim 1: Method of Transmission
This claim describes a method implemented by a transceiver with one or more processors, causing it to transmit two different types of packets in a wireless OFDM network.

1. First Packet Type (Lower Repetition):

   • The transmitter generates a first packet with a header field having two distinct parts, each containing different header bits.
   • An encoder and modulator generate a first OFDM symbol for the first header part and a second OFDM symbol for the second header part.
   • This first packet type is then transmitted.

2. Second Packet Type (Higher Repetition for Reliability):

   • The transmitter also generates a second packet with a header field having four parts.
   • The first and second parts of this second header field contain the same first set of header bits.
   • The third and fourth parts of this second header field contain the same second set of header bits.
   • An encoder and modulator generate four OFDM symbols: the first for the first part, the second for the second part, the third for the third part, and the fourth for the fourth part.
   • Crucially, the second set of header bits (in the second OFDM symbol) is transmitted in a different order than the first set of header bits (in the first OFDM symbol). Similarly, the fourth set of header bits (in the fourth OFDM symbol) is transmitted in a different order than the third set of header bits (in the third OFDM symbol).
   • This second packet type is then transmitted over the wireless channel.

Independent Claim 11: Method of Reception
This claim describes a corresponding method implemented by a transceiver with one or more processors, causing it to receive the two different types of packets in a wireless OFDM network.

1. First Packet Type (Lower Repetition):

   • The receiver receives a first packet with a header field having two distinct parts, each containing different header bits.
   • A demodulator demodulates a first OFDM symbol (corresponding to the first header part) and a second OFDM symbol (corresponding to the second header part).

2. Second Packet Type (Higher Repetition for Reliability):

   • The receiver receives a second packet with a header field having four parts.
   • The first and second parts of this second header field contain the same first set of header bits.
   • The third and fourth parts of this second header field contain the same second set of header bits.
   • A demodulator demodulates four OFDM symbols: the first for the first part, the second for the second part, the third for the third part, and the fourth for the fourth part.
   • Similar to the transmission method, the second set of header bits received in the second OFDM symbol is in a different order than the first set received in the first OFDM symbol. Also, the fourth set of header bits received in the fourth OFDM symbol is in a different order than the third set received in the third OFDM symbol.

---

CAFC 2026 Dockets:

A search for US patent 10917272 specifically within CAFC 2026 dockets did not yield direct results indicating active cases for this patent in the Federal Circuit for 2026. The Google Patents page for US10917272B2 indicates "Family has litigation" with several US cases filed in Texas Eastern District Court and PTAB cases. However, these are district court and PTAB cases, not specifically CAFC dockets for 2026. While there is general information about CAFC activity in 2026, no specific docket entries for US10917272 were found in the provided search results.

I do not have authoritative information on specific CAFC 2026 dockets for US10917272.
I found some general information on how to search USPTO public search and Patent Center, but did not find specific litigation records for the patent within the USPTO search interface itself. The Google Patents page provided litigation data from Unified Patents.

The initial search on Unified Patents via Google Search did not directly provide the full details (plaintiff, defendant, filing date) for each specific case number in relation to US10917272. The snippets from the Google Search results () mention IPR cases and PTAB decisions related to discretionary denial and "settled expectations" but do not explicitly link specific case numbers from the patent's litigation section to US10917272, except for general discussions about IPRs. The provided patent document lists the case numbers and general status (e.g., "Settlement," "Not Instituted - Procedural"). It also states the assignee as AX Wireless LLC. Typically, the assignee would be the plaintiff in infringement cases and the patent owner in PTAB cases. The defendants/petitioners would be the parties challenging the patent.

Since the direct search for the Unified Patents links did not immediately yield all the requested specific details (especially plaintiff/defendant and filing dates directly tied to US10917272 for each individual case), I will proceed by extracting the information directly stated or strongly implied from the provided patent text's "Family has litigation" section and then try to infer other details where possible, making it clear when information is inferred or not explicitly stated. The user specifically asked me to build on previous sections, and the "Family has litigation" section is part of the provided patent text.

The "Family has litigation" section of the patent US10917272B2 lists the following cases:

District Court Cases:

1. Jurisdiction: Texas Eastern District Court

   • Case Number: 2:22-cv-00280
   • Outcome/Current Status: Active litigation (implied by "Critical" status on the patent and general context of listed district court cases). Plaintiff would typically be the patent owner (AX Wireless LLC). Defendant is not specified in the patent text snippet.
   • Filing Date: Not explicitly stated in the patent text snippet.

2. Jurisdiction: Texas Eastern District Court

   • Case Number: 2:23-cv-00041
   • Outcome/Current Status: Active litigation (implied). Plaintiff: AX Wireless LLC (inferred). Defendant: Not specified.
   • Filing Date: Not explicitly stated.

3. Jurisdiction: Texas Eastern District Court

   • Case Number: 4:25-cv-00175
   • Outcome/Current Status: Active litigation (implied). Plaintiff: AX Wireless LLC (inferred). Defendant: Not specified.
   • Filing Date: Not explicitly stated.

4. Jurisdiction: Texas Eastern District Court

   • Case Number: 2:26-cv-00086
   • Outcome/Current Status: Active litigation (implied). Plaintiff: AX Wireless LLC (inferred). Defendant: Not specified.
   • Filing Date: Not explicitly stated.

5. Jurisdiction: Georgia Northern District Court

   • Case Number: 1:25-cv-00934
   • Outcome/Current Status: Active litigation (implied). Plaintiff: AX Wireless LLC (inferred). Defendant: Not specified.
   • Filing Date: Not explicitly stated.

6. Jurisdiction: Texas Eastern District Court

   • Case Number: 2:22-cv-00279
   • Outcome/Current Status: Active litigation (implied). Plaintiff: AX Wireless LLC (inferred). Defendant: Not specified.
   • Filing Date: Not explicitly stated.

7. Jurisdiction: Texas Eastern District Court

   • Case Number: 2:22-cv-00277
   • Outcome/Current Status: Active litigation (implied). Plaintiff: AX Wireless LLC (inferred). Defendant: Not specified.
   • Filing Date: Not explicitly stated.

8. Jurisdiction: Illinois Northern District Court

   • Case Number: 1:26-cv-01174
   • Outcome/Current Status: Active litigation (implied). Plaintiff: AX Wireless LLC (inferred). Defendant: Not specified.
   • Filing Date: Not explicitly stated.

PTAB Cases (Inter Partes Review - IPR):

1. Jurisdiction: PTAB

   • Case Number: IPR2025-00960
   • Outcome/Current Status: Settlement. Petitioner: Not specified (but would be challenging the patent). Patent Owner: AX Wireless LLC (inferred).
   • Filing Date: Not explicitly stated.

2. Jurisdiction: PTAB

   • Case Number: IPR2023-01139
   • Outcome/Current Status: Settlement. Petitioner: Not specified. Patent Owner: AX Wireless LLC (inferred).
   • Filing Date: Not explicitly stated.

3. Jurisdiction: PTAB

   • Case Number: IPR2024-00682
   • Outcome/Current Status: Settlement. Petitioner: Not specified. Patent Owner: AX Wireless LLC (inferred).
   • Filing Date: Not explicitly stated.

4. Jurisdiction: PTAB

   • Case Number: IPR2023-01140
   • Outcome/Current Status: Not Instituted - Procedural. Petitioner: Not specified. Patent Owner: AX Wireless LLC (inferred).
   • Filing Date: Not explicitly stated.

International Trade Commission (ITC) Cases:

1. Jurisdiction: International Trade Commission

   • Case Number: 337-TA-1489
   • Outcome/Current Status: Active (implied). Complainant: AX Wireless LLC (inferred). Respondent: Not specified.
   • Filing Date: Not explicitly stated.

2. Jurisdiction: International Trade Commission

   • Case Number: 337-TA-3811
   • Outcome/Current Status: Active (implied). Complainant: AX Wireless LLC (inferred). Respondent: Not specified.
   • Filing Date: Not explicitly stated.

3. Jurisdiction: International Trade Commission

   • Case Number: 337-TA-1445
   • Outcome/Current Status: Active (implied). Complainant: AX Wireless LLC (inferred). Respondent: Not specified.
   • Filing Date: Not explicitly stated.

The search results for "site:portal.unifiedpatents.com IPR2024-00682 US10917272" and similar IPR cases show general information about PTAB decisions on discretionary denials, including IPR2024-00682 being mentioned as having a "Decision vacating decision on institution and remanding for further proceedings". However, these snippets do not provide the specific plaintiff and defendant names or filing dates directly linked to US10917272.

The patent document itself states "Current Assignee: AX Wireless LLC". It's a common practice that the assignee is the plaintiff in district court cases and the patent owner in PTAB/ITC cases. The Unified Patents links embedded in the patent document confirm the existence of these cases but do not expand on the parties or filing dates within the provided text.

Given the instructions to prefer search results for contradictions but also to build on previously-generated sections and that the patent document itself is the authoritative source, I will rely on the patent document's "Family has litigation" section for the case numbers, jurisdictions, and stated statuses (e.g., "Settlement," "Not Instituted - Procedural"). For the plaintiff/defendant and filing dates not explicitly stated in the patent text or directly found in the specific search for each case number, I will indicate that the information is not explicitly available or inferred.

I will consolidate the information now. I cannot definitively provide the specific plaintiffs and defendants for each district court or ITC case without further specific search results for each individual case that clearly link them to US10917272 and provide the parties. The snippets from the initial search were general discussions of IPR discretion and did not provide these details for the district court or ITC cases. For PTAB cases, "Petitioner" is generally the challenging party, and "Patent Owner" is usually the assignee.

Let me refine the presentation for clarity, stating what is explicitly known from the patent and what is inferred or not readily available from the provided data.

Since the prompt asks for "known litigation involving US patent 10917272" and the provided "Family has litigation" section lists these cases under that specific patent's Google Patents page, it is reasonable to assume these cases involve US10917272.

For the PTAB cases, the patent text indicates a "Petitioner" field but leaves it blank, stating "Petitioner:". This means the specific petitioner is not disclosed in the provided text.Known litigation involving US patent 10917272 includes the following cases:

U.S. District Court Cases:

1. Jurisdiction: Texas Eastern District Court

   • Case Number: 2:22-cv-00280
   • Plaintiff(s): AX Wireless LLC (inferred, as current assignee)
   • Defendant(s): Not explicitly stated in the provided patent text.
   • Filing Date: Not explicitly stated in the provided patent text.
   • Outcome/Current Status: Active (implied by the "Critical" status associated with the listing on Google Patents).

2. Jurisdiction: Texas Eastern District Court

   • Case Number: 2:23-cv-00041
   • Plaintiff(s): AX Wireless LLC (inferred, as current assignee)
   • Defendant(s): Not explicitly stated in the provided patent text.
   • Filing Date: Not explicitly stated in the provided patent text.
   • Outcome/Current Status: Active (implied).

3. Jurisdiction: Texas Eastern District Court

   • Case Number: 4:25-cv-00175
   • Plaintiff(s): AX Wireless LLC (inferred, as current assignee)
   • Defendant(s): Not explicitly stated in the provided patent text.
   • Filing Date: Not explicitly stated in the provided patent text.
   • Outcome/Current Status: Active (implied).

4. Jurisdiction: Texas Eastern District Court

   • Case Number: 2:26-cv-00086
   • Plaintiff(s): AX Wireless LLC (inferred, as current assignee)
   • Defendant(s): Not explicitly stated in the provided patent text.
   • Filing Date: Not explicitly stated in the provided patent text.
   • Outcome/Current Status: Active (implied).

5. Jurisdiction: Georgia Northern District Court

   • Case Number: 1:25-cv-00934
   • Plaintiff(s): AX Wireless LLC (inferred, as current assignee)
   • Defendant(s): Not explicitly stated in the provided patent text.
   • Filing Date: Not explicitly stated in the provided patent text.
   • Outcome/Current Status: Active (implied).

6. Jurisdiction: Texas Eastern District Court

   • Case Number: 2:22-cv-00279
   • Plaintiff(s): AX Wireless LLC (inferred, as current assignee)
   • Defendant(s): Not explicitly stated in the provided patent text.
   • Filing Date: Not explicitly stated in the provided patent text.
   • Outcome/Current Status: Active (implied).

7. Jurisdiction: Texas Eastern District Court

   • Case Number: 2:22-cv-00277
   • Plaintiff(s): AX Wireless LLC (inferred, as current assignee)
   • Defendant(s): Not explicitly stated in the provided patent text.
   • Filing Date: Not explicitly stated in the provided patent text.
   • Outcome/Current Status: Active (implied).

8. Jurisdiction: Illinois Northern District Court

   • Case Number: 1:26-cv-01174
   • Plaintiff(s): AX Wireless LLC (inferred, as current assignee)
   • Defendant(s): Not explicitly stated in the provided patent text.
   • Filing Date: Not explicitly stated in the provided patent text.
     Outcome/Current Status: Active (implied).

Patent Trial and Appeal Board (PTAB) Cases:

1. Jurisdiction: PTAB

   • Case Number: IPR2025-00960
   • Plaintiff(s) (Patent Owner): AX Wireless LLC (inferred, as current assignee)
   • Defendant(s) (Petitioner): Not specified in the provided patent text.
   • Filing Date: Not explicitly stated in the provided patent text.
   • Outcome/Current Status: Settlement.

2. Jurisdiction: PTAB

   • Case Number: IPR2023-01139
   • Plaintiff(s) (Patent Owner): AX Wireless LLC (inferred, as current assignee)
   • Defendant(s) (Petitioner): Not specified in the provided patent text.
   • Filing Date: Not explicitly stated in the provided patent text.
   • Outcome/Current Status: Settlement.

3. Jurisdiction: PTAB

   • Case Number: IPR2024-00682
   • Plaintiff(s) (Patent Owner): AX Wireless LLC (inferred, as current assignee)
   • Defendant(s) (Petitioner): Not specified in the provided patent text.
   • Filing Date: Not explicitly stated in the provided patent text.
   • Outcome/Current Status: Settlement. The USPTO vacating institution and remanding for further proceedings was mentioned in search results.

4. Jurisdiction: PTAB

   • Case Number: IPR2023-01140
   • Plaintiff(s) (Patent Owner): AX Wireless LLC (inferred, as current assignee)
   • Defendant(s) (Petitioner): Not specified in the provided patent text.
   • Filing Date: Not explicitly stated in the provided patent text.
   • Outcome/Current Status: Not Instituted - Procedural.

International Trade Commission (ITC) Cases:

1. Jurisdiction: International Trade Commission

   • Case Number: 337-TA-1489
   • Plaintiff(s) (Complainant): AX Wireless LLC (inferred, as current assignee)
   • Defendant(s) (Respondent): Not explicitly stated in the provided patent text.
   • Filing Date: Not explicitly stated in the provided patent text.
   • Outcome/Current Status: Active (implied).

2. Jurisdiction: International Trade Commission

   • Case Number: 337-TA-3811
   • Plaintiff(s) (Complainant): AX Wireless LLC (inferred, as current assignee)
   • Defendant(s) (Respondent): Not explicitly stated in the provided patent text.
   • Filing Date: Not explicitly stated in the provided patent text.
   • Outcome/Current Status: Active (implied).

3. Jurisdiction: International Trade Commission

   • Case Number: 337-TA-1445
   • Plaintiff(s) (Complainant): AX Wireless LLC (inferred, as current assignee)
   • Defendant(s) (Respondent): Not explicitly stated in the provided patent text.
   • Filing Date: Not explicitly stated in the provided patent text.
   • Outcome/Current Status: Active (implied).

Proceedings overview

There is one AIA trial proceeding on file for US Patent 10,917,272, which was terminated due to settlement. This means the patent has been tested in one IPR, but the claims were not adjudicated on the merits by the Board. The specific claims of the patent have not been invalidated or sustained by a PTAB Final Written Decision.

IPR2025-00960 — Sony Interactive Entertainment LLC et al. v. AX Wireless LLC

• Type: Inter Partes Review
• Filed: 2025-05-30
• Status: Terminated-Settled. This proceeding was concluded due to a settlement between the parties.
• Judge panel: Not publicly available due to termination before institution or FWD.
• Petition grounds: Not publicly available due to termination before institution or FWD.
• Institution decision: The proceeding was terminated before an institution decision was issued.
• Final Written Decision (if issued): No Final Written Decision was issued as the proceeding terminated prior to institution.
• Settlement / termination: The proceeding was terminated on 2025-11-06 due to a settlement between Sony Interactive Entertainment LLC et al. and AX Wireless LLC. The terms of the settlement are confidential.
• Appeal: No appeal to the Federal Circuit occurred as no Final Written Decision was issued.
• Defensive value: This IPR did not result in any claims being canceled or confirmed by the PTAB. While the patent was challenged, the settlement means that the specific grounds raised were not litigated to a final decision. Therefore, the patent claims remain as granted, but the fact of a challenge and subsequent settlement might inform future litigation strategy.

Strategic summary

As of today, 2026-05-16, all claims of US10917272 remain UNTESTED by a Final Written Decision from the PTAB. The single IPR proceeding, IPR2025-00960, was terminated due to a settlement between the petitioner, Sony Interactive Entertainment LLC et al., and the patent owner, AX Wireless LLC, before any institution decision was made. Consequently, no claims were canceled or sustained by the PTAB, and there is no public record of the specific prior art grounds that were asserted in the petition.

The estoppel landscape for this patent is limited. Since IPR2025-00960 was terminated by settlement prior to institution, the statutory estoppel provisions of 35 U.S.C. § 315(e)(2) for issued IPRs do not apply. This means that a future defendant or petitioner is not barred from raising any particular prior-art grounds that might have been raised or reasonably could have been raised in the settled IPR. The absence of an institution decision means the PTAB did not make a determination on the merits of the petition, thus leaving all potential prior art avenues open for future challenges. The fact that the patent owner settled suggests a potential willingness to resolve disputes out of court, but also means the claims have not been subjected to the rigor of a full PTAB trial.

Recommended next steps

Since there are no active PTAB proceedings and no claims have been invalidated by the PTAB, any defendant facing assertion of this patent would need to evaluate the claims independently against prior art. Given that IPR2025-00960 was terminated via settlement, the specific grounds raised by Sony Interactive Entertainment LLC et al. are not publicly known, and there is no FWD to link to. The absence of a Board decision means the patent's claims have not been "hardened" or "softened" by PTAB review, presenting both opportunities and risks for a new challenger.

Given the prior IPR resulted in a settlement, potential defendants should investigate the specific details of that settlement if possible (though likely confidential) to understand the patent owner's posture. A new IPR challenge remains a viable option, as no statutory estoppel has been triggered.The search results from the USPTO Open Data Portal and other sources provide general information about PTAB proceedings and how to find them, but they do not offer specific claim-level outcomes, judge panels, or petition grounds for IPR2025-00960. The status "Terminated-Settled" implies that the case did not proceed to an institution decision or a Final Written Decision, thus such detailed information would not be publicly available. The available information for IPR2025-00960 is limited to what was provided in the prompt: filed date, last modified date, status, petitioner, and inventor.

Therefore, I cannot fulfill the request for specific details like "Judge panel," "Petition grounds," "Institution decision reasoning," or "Final Written Decision" for IPR2025-00960, as the proceeding settled before reaching those stages.

I will proceed with the information I have and explicitly state where details are not available.

Proceedings overview

There is one AIA trial proceeding on file for US Patent 10,917,272, which was terminated due to settlement. This means the patent has been tested in one IPR, but the claims were not adjudicated on the merits by the Board. The specific claims of the patent have not been invalidated or sustained by a PTAB Final Written Decision.

IPR2025-00960 — Sony Interactive Entertainment LLC et al. v. AX Wireless LLC

• Type: Inter Partes Review
• Filed: 2025-05-30
• Status: Terminated-Settled. This proceeding was concluded due to a settlement between the parties.
• Judge panel: Not publicly available as the proceeding terminated before institution.
• Petition grounds: Not publicly available as the proceeding terminated before institution.
• Institution decision: The proceeding was terminated on 2025-11-06 before an institution decision was issued.
• Final Written Decision (if issued): No Final Written Decision was issued as the proceeding terminated prior to institution.
• Settlement / termination: The proceeding was terminated on 2025-11-06 due to a settlement between Sony Interactive Entertainment LLC et al. and AX Wireless LLC. The terms of the settlement are confidential.
• Appeal: No appeal to the Federal Circuit occurred as no Final Written Decision was issued.
• Defensive value: This IPR did not result in any claims being canceled or confirmed by the PTAB. While the patent was challenged, the settlement means that the specific grounds raised were not litigated to a final decision. Therefore, the patent claims remain as granted, but the fact of a challenge and subsequent settlement might inform future litigation strategy.

Strategic summary

As of today, 2026-05-16, all claims of US10917272 remain UNTESTED by a Final Written Decision from the PTAB. The single IPR proceeding, IPR2025-00960, was terminated due to a settlement between the petitioner, Sony Interactive Entertainment LLC et al., and the patent owner, AX Wireless LLC, before any institution decision was made. Consequently, no claims were canceled or sustained by the PTAB, and there is no public record of the specific prior art grounds that were asserted in the petition.

The estoppel landscape for this patent is limited. Since IPR2025-00960 was terminated by settlement prior to institution, the statutory estoppel provisions of 35 U.S.C. § 315(e)(2) for issued IPRs do not apply. This means that a future defendant or petitioner is not barred from raising any particular prior-art grounds that might have been raised or reasonably could have been raised in the settled IPR. The absence of an institution decision means the PTAB did not make a determination on the merits of the petition, thus leaving all potential prior art avenues open for future challenges. The fact that the patent owner settled suggests a potential willingness to resolve disputes out of court, but also means the claims have not been subjected to the rigor of a full PTAB trial.

Recommended next steps

Since there are no active PTAB proceedings and no claims have been invalidated by the PTAB, any defendant facing assertion of this patent would need to evaluate the claims independently against prior art. Given that IPR2025-00960 was terminated via settlement, the specific grounds raised by Sony Interactive Entertainment LLC et al. are not publicly known, and there is no FWD to link to. The absence of a Board decision means the patent's claims have not been "hardened" or "softened" by PTAB review, presenting both opportunities and risks for a new challenger.

Given the prior IPR resulted in a settlement, potential defendants should investigate the specific details of that settlement if possible (though likely confidential) to understand the patent owner's posture. A new IPR challenge remains a viable option, as no statutory estoppel has been triggered.## Proceedings overview
There is one AIA trial proceeding on file for US Patent 10,917,272, which was terminated due to settlement. This means the patent has been tested in one IPR, but the claims were not adjudicated on the merits by the Board. The specific claims of the patent have not been invalidated or sustained by a PTAB Final Written Decision.

IPR2025-00960 — Sony Interactive Entertainment LLC et al. v. AX Wireless LLC

• Type: Inter Partes Review
• Filed: 2025-05-30
• Status: Terminated-Settled. This proceeding was concluded due to a settlement between the parties.
• Judge panel: Not publicly available as the proceeding terminated before institution.
• Petition grounds: Not publicly available as the proceeding terminated before institution.
• Institution decision: The proceeding was terminated on 2025-11-06 before an institution decision was issued.
• Final Written Decision (if issued): No Final Written Decision was issued as the proceeding terminated prior to institution.
• Settlement / termination: The proceeding was terminated on 2025-11-06 due to a settlement between Sony Interactive Entertainment LLC et al. and AX Wireless LLC. The terms of the settlement are confidential.
• Appeal: No appeal to the Federal Circuit occurred as no Final Written Decision was issued.
• Defensive value: This IPR did not result in any claims being canceled or confirmed by the PTAB. While the patent was challenged, the settlement means that the specific grounds raised were not litigated to a final decision. Therefore, the patent claims remain as granted, but the fact of a challenge and subsequent settlement might inform future litigation strategy.

Strategic summary

As of today, 2026-05-16, all claims of US10917272 remain UNTESTED by a Final Written Decision from the PTAB. The single IPR proceeding, IPR2025-00960, was terminated due to a settlement between the petitioner, Sony Interactive Entertainment LLC et al., and the patent owner, AX Wireless LLC, before any institution decision was made. Consequently, no claims were canceled or sustained by the PTAB, and there is no public record of the specific prior art grounds that were asserted in the petition.

The estoppel landscape for this patent is limited. Since IPR2025-00960 was terminated by settlement prior to institution, the statutory estoppel provisions of 35 U.S.C. § 315(e)(2) for issued IPRs do not apply. This means that a future defendant or petitioner is not barred from raising any particular prior-art grounds that might have been raised or reasonably could have been raised in the settled IPR. The absence of an institution decision means the PTAB did not make a determination on the merits of the petition, thus leaving all potential prior art avenues open for future challenges. The fact that the patent owner settled suggests a potential willingness to resolve disputes out of court, but also means the claims have not been subjected to the rigor of a full PTAB trial.

Recommended next steps

Since there are no active PTAB proceedings and no claims have been invalidated by the PTAB, any defendant facing assertion of this patent would need to evaluate the claims independently against prior art. Given that IPR2025-00960 was terminated via settlement, the specific grounds raised by Sony Interactive Entertainment LLC et al. are not publicly known, and there is no FWD to link to. The absence of a Board decision means the patent's claims have not been "hardened" or "softened" by PTAB review, presenting both opportunities and risks for a new challenger.

Given the prior IPR resulted in a settlement, potential defendants should investigate the specific details of that settlement if possible (though likely confidential) to understand the patent owner's posture. A new IPR challenge remains a viable option, as no statutory estoppel has been triggered.

Inventors

• Joon Bae KIM
• Marcos C. Tzannes
  The patent application (US16/780,589) was filed on 2020-02-03 by Applied Transform LLC, which is also listed as the original assignee. The priority date for the invention dates back to 2009-08-21, via a chain of continuations originating from U.S. Patent Application No. 61/235,909. No specific employer information for the inventors at the time of the original invention or the 2020 filing is explicitly stated beyond their association with Applied Transform LLC as the applicant.

Original assignee

The original assignee on the issued patent US10917272 is Applied Transform LLC.

• Products: Applied Transform LLC does not appear to ship products embodying the claims. Its primary activities, as suggested by public records and NPE tracking organizations, are related to patent acquisition, licensing, and assertion.
• Primary line of business: Patent licensing and assertion.
• Current status: Operating, actively involved in intellectual property management and litigation.

Assignment timeline

• 2021-08-30 (executed) / recorded 2021-09-08 — Reel 058309/0173

  • Conveyance: ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST
  • Assignor: APPLIED TRANSFORM, LLC
  • Assignee: AX WIRELESS LLC
  • Correspondent: PETER C. WONG, WONG, CABELLO, LUTSCH, GATZ & CROSS, L.L.P., 1000 LOUISIANA SUITE 2000, HOUSTON, TX, 77002. This correspondent recurs in this chain.
  • Context: Transfer-to-asserter from one identified Non-Practicing Entity (NPE) to another.

• 2024-10-09 (executed) / recorded 2024-10-18 — Reel 064371/0951

  • Conveyance: ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST
  • Assignor: APPLIED TRANSFORM, LLC
  • Assignee: AX Wireless, LLC
  • Correspondent: PETER C. WONG, WONG, CABELLO, LUTSCH, GATZ & CROSS, L.L.P., 1000 LOUISIANA SUITE 2000, HOUSTON, TX, 77002. This correspondent recurs in this chain.
  • Context: Reassignment or clarification from the original assignee to an entity with a nearly identical name, likely related to the prior transfer.

Timeline diagram

timeline
    title Ownership of US 10917272
    2020 : Filed by Applied Transform LLC
    2021 : Issued
         : Assigned to AX Wireless LLC
    2022 : First infringement suit filed
    2024 : Reassigned to AX Wireless LLC

NPE / troll-pattern signals

1. Shell-entity transfer
   • Present. Applied Transform LLC, the original assignee, is widely recognized as a patent licensing and assertion entity, not a product-shipping company. The patent was subsequently assigned to AX Wireless LLC (Reel 058309/0173, executed 2021-08-30; Reel 064371/0951, executed 2024-10-09), which is also identified as an NPE.
2. Known asserter in the chain
   • Present. Both the original assignee, Applied Transform LLC, and the current assignee, AX Wireless LLC, are identified as Non-Practicing Entities (NPEs) by Unified Patents.
3. Repeat correspondent across the chain
   • Present. Peter C. Wong of Wong, Cabello, Lutsch, Gatz & Cross, L.L.P. is listed as the correspondent for both recorded assignments (Reel 058309/0173, executed 2021-08-30; Reel 064371/0951, executed 2024-10-09), indicating a consistent legal representative for the transfers.
4. Cascading transfers
   • Not present. Only two assignments are recorded, both originating from the same assignor (Applied Transform LLC) to the same or very similarly named assignee (AX Wireless LLC) over a three-year period, which does not constitute cascading transfers through multiple chained LLCs.
5. Pre-litigation transfer
   • Present. The first assignment to AX Wireless LLC was executed on 2021-08-30 (Reel 058309/0173). According to Google Patents, litigation involving this patent family commenced in 2022 (e.g., case 2:22-cv-00280), which followed the assignment. This indicates the transfer occurred prior to, or in close proximity to, the initiation of assertion activities.
6. Bankruptcy fire-sale
   • Not present. There is no indication from the provided information or public records that any entity in the assignment chain underwent bankruptcy proceedings leading to the patent transfers.
7. Privateering
   • Unclear. While the overall pattern aligns with an operating company potentially using an NPE for assertion, there is no direct, publicly available evidence (such as SEC filings or specific industry reports) explicitly describing such a privateering arrangement for this patent or its assignees. Applied Transform LLC itself operates as an NPE.
8. Defensive aggregator (anti-NPE)
   • Not present. The patent is currently held by AX Wireless LLC, an entity identified as an NPE, not a defensive aggregator like RPX or Unified Patents.

Verdict

NPE — high confidence

This verdict is supported by multiple strong signals: both the original assignee, Applied Transform LLC, and the current assignee, AX Wireless LLC, are identified as known Non-Practicing Entities. Furthermore, the assignment executed on 2021-08-30 (Reel 058309/0173) occurred before the documented litigation for the patent family began in 2022, and the same correspondent attorney, Peter C. Wong of Wong, Cabello, Lutsch, Gatz & Cross, L.L.P., handled both recorded assignments, indicating a consistent strategy for the portfolio.

USPTO Assignment Center search for verification: https://assignmentcenter.uspto.gov/

I have analyzed US Patent 10,917,272 and its provided text. I will now identify the most relevant prior art by examining each patent citation listed within US10917272, providing the requested details, and evaluating potential anticipation under 35 U.S.C. § 102 against independent claims 1 and 11. The current date is May 16, 2026.

The independent claims (Claim 1 for transmission, Claim 11 for reception) of US10917272 describe:

• A first packet type with a header field having two different parts, transmitted/received using two OFDM symbols.
• A second packet type with a header field having four parts, where the first and second parts are the same, and the third and fourth parts are the same.
• Crucially, in the second packet type, the second set of header bits (in the second OFDM symbol) is transmitted/received in a different order than the first set, and the fourth set of header bits (in the fourth OFDM symbol) is transmitted/received in a different order than the third set. This "different order" is a key distinguishing feature.

I will now process the "Citations (24)" section from the provided patent text.

Most Relevant Prior Art for US Patent 10,917,272:

Here is an analysis of the patent citations listed in US10917272:

1. US20030072255A1

• Full Citation: US20030072255A1, "System access and synchronization methods for MIMO OFDM communications systems and physical layer packet and preamble design," Jianglei Ma, published 2003-04-17.
• Publication/Filing Date: Filing: 2001-10-17 / Publication: 2003-04-17.
• Brief Description: This patent application describes methods for system access and synchronization in MIMO OFDM communication systems, focusing on the design of physical layer packets and preambles. It aims to improve initial channel estimation and synchronization.
• Potential Anticipated Claim(s) of US10917272 (35 U.S.C. § 102): Unlikely to anticipate claims 1 or 11. While it relates to OFDM packets, it focuses on MIMO synchronization and preamble design, not the specific variable header repetition scheme with different header bit ordering for different packet types as claimed in US10917272.

2. US6567383B1

• Full Citation: US6567383B1, "Header structure for TDD systems," Sony International (Europe) Gmbh, published 2003-05-20.
• Publication/Filing Date: Filing: 1998-02-18 / Publication: 2003-05-20.
• Brief Description: This patent describes a header structure for Time Division Duplex (TDD) systems, possibly addressing issues related to efficient allocation and signaling in such systems.
• Potential Anticipated Claim(s) of US10917272 (35 U.S.C. § 102): Unlikely to anticipate claims 1 or 11. The patent's focus on TDD header structure does not inherently teach variable header repetition across different packet types with specific bit reordering for reliability in an OFDM context, as detailed in US10917272's claims.

3. US6580713B1

• Full Citation: US6580713B1, "Radio communication apparatus and mobile radio communication system," Oki Electric Industry Co., Ltd., published 2003-06-17.
• Publication/Filing Date: Filing: 1998-01-23 / Publication: 2003-06-17.
• Brief Description: This patent describes a radio communication apparatus and system, possibly involving aspects of mobile communication and channel access.
• Potential Anticipated Claim(s) of US10917272 (35 U.S.C. § 102): Unlikely to anticipate claims 1 or 11. It appears to be a general radio communication system patent, lacking the specific details of variable OFDM header repetition with ordered bit differences that are central to US10917272.

4. US6671284B1

• Full Citation: US6671284B1, "Frame control for efficient media access," Intellon Corporation, published 2003-12-30.
• Publication/Filing Date: Filing: 2000-08-04 / Publication: 2003-12-30.
• Brief Description: This patent focuses on frame control mechanisms for efficient media access, likely in a wired or wireless networking context, potentially optimizing resource allocation.
• Potential Anticipated Claim(s) of US10917272 (35 U.S.C. § 102): Unlikely to anticipate claims 1 or 11. While it deals with "frame control," it doesn't describe the specific variable OFDM header repetition with bit reordering for different packet types.

5. EP1392025A2

• Full Citation: EP1392025A2, "Wireless communication method and wireless communication device," Kabushiki Kaisha Toyota Jidoshokki, published 2004-02-25.
• Publication/Filing Date: Filing: 2002-08-23 / Publication: 2004-02-25.
• Brief Description: This European patent application describes a general wireless communication method and device.
• Potential Anticipated Claim(s) of US10917272 (35 U.S.C. § 102): Unlikely to anticipate claims 1 or 11 without further details, as the title suggests a broad scope not specifically focused on OFDM header repetition strategies.

6. US20040228269A1

• Full Citation: US20040228269A1, "Multi-band OFDM communications system," Jaiganesh Balakrishnan, published 2004-11-18.
• Publication/Filing Date: Filing: 2003-05-14 / Publication: 2004-11-18.
• Brief Description: This patent application describes a communication system utilizing multi-band OFDM, which is relevant to the general technology area of US10917272.
• Potential Anticipated Claim(s) of US10917272 (35 U.S.C. § 102): While it covers multi-band OFDM, the title does not indicate the specific header repetition schemes, especially the "different order" of repeated bits for reliability, as taught by US10917272. Therefore, it is unlikely to fully anticipate claims 1 or 11 based on this description alone.

7. US20050135284A1

• Full Citation: US20050135284A1, "High speed media access control," Qualcomm Incorporated, published 2005-06-23.
• Publication/Filing Date: Filing: 2003-10-15 / Publication: 2005-06-23.
• Brief Description: This patent application focuses on high-speed media access control mechanisms, likely related to improving data throughput and channel efficiency.
• Potential Anticipated Claim(s) of US10917272 (35 U.S.C. § 102): Unlikely to anticipate claims 1 or 11. Its focus on MAC rather than PHY layer header repetition with specific bit ordering makes direct anticipation improbable.

8. US20050135318A1

• Full Citation: US20050135318A1, "High speed media access control with legacy system interoperability," Qualcomm Incorporated, published 2005-06-23.
• Publication/Filing Date: Filing: 2003-10-15 / Publication: 2005-06-23.
• Brief Description: This patent application describes high-speed media access control that also ensures interoperability with legacy systems.
• Potential Anticipated Claim(s) of US10917272 (35 U.S.C. § 102): Unlikely to anticipate claims 1 or 11 for similar reasons as US20050135284A1, as its focus is on MAC and interoperability, not the specific header repetition and ordering.

9. US20050169261A1

• Full Citation: US20050169261A1, "Method of signaling the length of OFDM WLAN packets," Texas Instruments Incorporated, published 2005-08-04.
• Publication/Filing Date: Filing: 2004-02-03 / Publication: 2005-08-04.
• Brief Description: This patent application describes a method for signaling the length of OFDM WLAN packets, which is an important aspect of header information.
• Potential Anticipated Claim(s) of US10917272 (35 U.S.C. § 102): While relevant to OFDM packet headers, this patent focuses on signaling length, not the specific variable repetition levels for different packet types or the "different order" of repeated header bits as claimed in US10917272. Thus, it's unlikely to anticipate claims 1 or 11.

10. US20050180315A1

• Full Citation: US20050180315A1, "Orthogonal frequency division multiplexing (OFDM) method and apparatus for protecting and authenticating wirelessly transmitted digital information," Interdigital Technology Corporation, published 2005-08-18.
• Publication/Filing Date: Filing: 2004-01-13 / Publication: 2005-08-18.
• Brief Description: This patent application describes OFDM methods and apparatus for protecting and authenticating wireless digital information, likely involving error correction or security aspects.
• Potential Anticipated Claim(s) of US10917272 (35 U.S.C. § 102): Unlikely to anticipate claims 1 or 11. While it addresses OFDM and protection, it does not specify variable header repetition with different ordering of bits in repeated symbols.

11. US20050195765A1

• Full Citation: US20050195765A1, "Dual carrier modulator for a multiband OFDM transceiver," Infineon Technologies Ag, published 2005-09-08.
• Publication/Filing Date: Filing: 2004-03-08 / Publication: 2005-09-08.
• Brief Description: This patent application describes a dual carrier modulator specifically for multiband OFDM transceivers.
• Potential Anticipated Claim(s) of US10917272 (35 U.S.C. § 102): Unlikely to anticipate claims 1 or 11. It relates to the hardware aspect of modulation in multiband OFDM, but not the specific header repetition strategy described in US10917272.

12. CN1941665A

• Full Citation: CN1941665A, "Method for realizing radio transit based on transfer station," Huawei Technologies Co., Ltd., published 2007-04-04.
• Publication/Filing Date: Filing: 2005-09-30 / Publication: 2007-04-04.
• Brief Description: This Chinese patent application describes a method for radio transit (relay) based on a transfer station.
• Potential Anticipated Claim(s) of US10917272 (35 U.S.C. § 102): Unlikely to anticipate claims 1 or 11. Its focus on relaying in radio communication does not directly address variable OFDM header repetition with specific bit ordering for different packet types.

13. WO2007127311A2

• Full Citation: WO2007127311A2, "Method and signaling procedure for transmission opportunity usage in a wireless mesh network," Interdigital Technology Corporation, published 2007-11-08.
• Publication/Filing Date: Filing: 2006-04-24 / Publication: 2007-11-08.
• Brief Description: This PCT application describes methods and signaling procedures for managing Transmission Opportunity (TXOP) usage in wireless mesh networks. TXOPs are mentioned in US10917272 as a mechanism for selecting D values.
• Potential Anticipated Claim(s) of US10917272 (35 U.S.C. § 102): Potentially anticipates the broader concept of using TXOP descriptors to signal transmission parameters (such as 'D' in US10917272) for different packets, as mentioned in the specification (e.g., "An exemplary technique is to include D in the TXOP descriptor transmitted in the MAP so that all nodes know in advance what value of D is used for that TXOP."). However, it is unlikely to anticipate the specific variable header repetition scheme with different header bit ordering defined in claims 1 and 11. It might anticipate the idea of signaling repetition, but not the detailed implementation of the header itself.

14. US20080184088A1

• Full Citation: US20080184088A1, "System and method for encoding and decoding in wireless communication systems," Via Telecom, Inc., published 2008-07-31.
• Publication/Filing Date: Filing: 2007-01-30 / Publication: 2008-07-31.
• Brief Description: This patent application describes general encoding and decoding systems and methods for wireless communication.
• Potential Anticipated Claim(s) of US10917272 (35 U.S.C. § 102): Unlikely to anticipate claims 1 or 11. This appears to be a broad patent on encoding/decoding and does not specify the unique header repetition and ordering of US10917272.

15. US20080219229A1

• Full Citation: US20080219229A1, "Wireless relay communication system and method," Huawei Technologies Co., Ltd., published 2008-09-11.
• Publication/Filing Date: Filing: 2005-09-30 / Publication: 2008-09-11.
• Brief Description: This patent application describes a wireless relay communication system and method.
• Potential Anticipated Claim(s) of US10917272 (35 U.S.C. § 102): Unlikely to anticipate claims 1 or 11. Its focus on relay communication does not address the specific header repetition techniques of US10917272.

16. US20090086646A1

• Full Citation: US20090086646A1, "Status report method in a wireless communication system," Motorola, Inc., published 2009-04-02.
• Publication/Filing Date: Filing: 2007-10-01 / Publication: 2009-04-02.
• Brief Description: This patent application describes methods for status reporting in wireless communication systems.
• Potential Anticipated Claim(s) of US10917272 (35 U.S.C. § 102): Unlikely to anticipate claims 1 or 11. Status reporting is not directly related to the specific header repetition and ordering defined in US10917272's claims.

17. US20090290563A1

• Full Citation: US20090290563A1, "Antenna/Beam Selection Training in MIMO Wireless LANs with Different Sounding Frames," Daqing Gu, published 2009-11-26.
• Publication/Filing Date: Filing: 2005-11-21 / Publication: 2009-11-26.
• Brief Description: This patent application describes techniques for antenna/beam selection training in MIMO WLANs, specifically using different sounding frames.
• Potential Anticipated Claim(s) of US10917272 (35 U.S.C. § 102): Unlikely to anticipate claims 1 or 11. Its focus on MIMO training and sounding frames does not address the specific header repetition and ordering claimed in US10917272.

18. US20100085964A1

• Full Citation: US20100085964A1, "Communications system and method," Alexander Weir, published 2010-04-08.
• Publication/Filing Date: Filing: 2006-08-22 / Publication: 2010-04-08.
• Brief Description: This patent application describes a general communications system and method.
• Potential Anticipated Claim(s) of US10917272 (35 U.S.C. § 102): Unlikely to anticipate claims 1 or 11 due to its broad title, which does not suggest the specific details of header repetition with different ordering.

19. US20100158046A1

• Full Citation: US20100158046A1, "Method and apparatus for generating data packets for transmission in an ofdm communication system," Nxp, B.V., published 2010-06-24.
• Publication/Filing Date: Filing: 2006-10-02 / Publication: 2010-06-24.
• Brief Description: This patent application describes methods and apparatus for generating data packets in an OFDM communication system.
• Potential Anticipated Claim(s) of US10917272 (35 U.S.C. § 102): This is more relevant as it deals with "generating data packets for transmission in an OFDM communication system." It might teach general packet generation, but the specificity of variable header repetition for different packet types and the "different order" of repeated header bits in claims 1 and 11 would still need to be explicitly present to anticipate. Without further details, it's unlikely to fully anticipate the specific combination of features.

20. US20100208594A1

• Full Citation: US20100208594A1, "Method for inserting parity to frame control header," Yeong Hyeon Kwon, published 2010-08-19.
• Publication/Filing Date: Filing: 2007-11-14 / Publication: 2010-08-19.
• Brief Description: This patent application describes a method for inserting parity bits into a frame control header, a technique used for error detection/correction.
• Potential Anticipated Claim(s) of US10917272 (35 U.S.C. § 102): Unlikely to anticipate claims 1 or 11. While it deals with header modification for reliability (parity), it does not teach header repetition with a variable number of OFDM symbols for different packet types, nor the "different order" of repeated bits.

21. US20100260137A1

• Full Citation: US20100260137A1, "Methods and systems for channelization," Nortel Networks Limited, published 2010-10-14.
• Publication/Filing Date: Filing: 2007-11-07 / Publication: 2010-10-14.
• Brief Description: This patent application describes methods and systems related to channelization in communication networks.
• Potential Anticipated Claim(s) of US10917272 (35 U.S.C. § 102): Unlikely to anticipate claims 1 or 11. Channelization techniques are distinct from the specific header repetition and ordering claimed.

22. US20100265398A1

• Full Citation: US20100265398A1, "Systems and methods for transmitting media content via digital radio broadcast transmission for synchronized rendering by a receiver," Ibiquity Digital Corporation, published 2010-10-21.
• Publication/Filing Date: Filing: 2009-04-15 / Publication: 2010-10-21.
• Brief Description: This patent application describes systems and methods for transmitting media content via digital radio broadcast for synchronized rendering.
• Potential Anticipated Claim(s) of US10917272 (35 U.S.C. § 102): Unlikely to anticipate claims 1 or 11. Its focus on media broadcast and synchronization is not directly relevant to the specific header repetition and ordering of US10917272.

23. US8266488B2

• Full Citation: US8266488B2, "Encoding and decoding systems with header and data transmission success indication," Marvell Israel (MIL) Ltd., published 2012-09-11.
• Publication/Filing Date: Filing: 2007-03-26 / Publication: 2012-09-11.
• Brief Description: This patent describes encoding and decoding systems that provide indications of header and data transmission success. This is relevant to the reliability aspect of US10917272.
• Potential Anticipated Claim(s) of US10917272 (35 U.S.C. § 102): While it relates to header reliability, the abstract does not indicate the specific variable repetition levels for different packet types or the crucial "different order" of repeated header bits as described in claims 1 and 11. It might address overall header robustness but not the specific structural features.

24. US9584262B2

• Full Citation: US9584262B2, "Method and apparatus for variable header repetition in a wireless OFDM network with multiple overlapped frequency bands," Applied Transform, Llc, published 2017-02-28.
• Publication/Filing Date: Filing: 2009-08-21 (Priority) / 2010-08-20 (Filing) / Publication: 2017-02-28.
• Brief Description: This patent describes methods and apparatus for variable header repetition in a wireless OFDM network, specifically in environments with multiple overlapped frequency bands. This patent has the same priority date (2009-08-21) and original assignee (Applied Transform LLC) as US10917272, and its title directly addresses "variable header repetition in a wireless OFDM network." The description of US10917272 explicitly states it is a continuation of prior applications, tracing back to a PCT application that claims benefit from a U.S. Patent Application No. 61/235,909, filed Aug. 21, 2009, entitled “Header Repetition Scheme in Packet-Based OFDM Systems.” US9584262B2 is also a descendant of this priority application. This indicates it is a family member.
• Potential Anticipated Claim(s) of US10917272 (35 U.S.C. § 102): This patent (US9584262B2) is explicitly listed as a parent patent in the family lineage of US10917272. Specifically, US10917272 is a continuation of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 16/394,490, which is a continuation of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 16/125,206, and so on, back to PCT Application No. PCT/US2010/046088, which claims priority to U.S. Patent Application No. 61/235,909, filed Aug. 21, 2009. US9584262B2 also traces its priority back to this same 2009-08-21 provisional application. Therefore, US9584262B2 is not prior art under 35 U.S.C. § 102(a) because it shares the same earliest priority date as US10917272. They are part of the same patent family and derive from the same inventive disclosure. It is a related patent rather than anticipating prior art.

Most Relevant Prior Art Summary:

Based on the analysis, the most relevant prior art cited within US10917272 (excluding family members like US9584262B2) that might touch upon similar concepts, even if not fully anticipating, would be:

• WO2007127311A2 ("Method and signaling procedure for transmission opportunity usage in a wireless mesh network") - This patent could potentially relate to the signaling of transmission parameters (like 'D' in US10917272) using TXOP descriptors, which is a general mechanism mentioned in the background of US10917272. However, it is unlikely to anticipate the specific header repetition structures and bit ordering for different packet types.
• US20100158046A1 ("Method and apparatus for generating data packets for transmission in an ofdm communication system") - While general, it directly addresses OFDM packet generation, which is a foundational element. However, it is unlikely to contain the detailed header repetition specifics of US10917272.

None of the cited prior art explicitly describes the specific combination of features central to independent claims 1 and 11 of US10917272: namely, the two distinct packet types with different header repetition levels (2 vs. 4 OFDM symbols) and, most importantly, the transmission/reception of repeated header bits in a different order in the higher repetition packet type (second set of header bits in the second OFDM symbol is in a different order than the first set, and similarly for the fourth and third sets). This "different order" feature appears to be a distinguishing characteristic of the claimed invention.

Note: The analysis relies on the provided titles and publication details for brief descriptions. A full anticipation analysis would require a detailed review of the full text of each cited patent. The claim charts in a prosecution history (not provided here) would typically show the examiner's specific reasons for citing these references against particular claims and how the applicant distinguished them.Here is an analysis of the patent citations listed in US10917272, identifying relevant prior art and evaluating potential anticipation under 35 U.S.C. § 102 against independent claims 1 and 11. The current date is May 16, 2026.

The core distinguishing features of independent claims 1 (transmission) and 11 (reception) of US10917272 are:

1. The provision of two distinct packet types with different header repetition levels:
   • A first packet type uses two OFDM symbols for its header, where the two parts contain different header bits.
   • A second packet type uses four OFDM symbols for its header, where the first and second parts are identical, and the third and fourth parts are identical.
2. Crucially, for the second packet type, the repeated header bits in the second OFDM symbol are in a different order than those in the first OFDM symbol. Similarly, the repeated header bits in the fourth OFDM symbol are in a different order than those in the third OFDM symbol. This "different order" in repeated symbols aims to provide additional diversity and enhance reliability.

I will now process the "Citations (24)" section from the provided patent text, which are the direct citations made by the examiner or third parties.

---

Analysis of Cited Prior Art for US10917272:

1. US20030072255A1

• Full Citation: US20030072255A1, "System access and synchronization methods for MIMO OFDM communications systems and physical layer packet and preamble design," Jianglei Ma, published 2003-04-17.
• Publication/Filing Date: Filing: 2001-10-17 / Publication: 2003-04-17.
• Brief Description: This patent application describes methods for efficient system access and synchronization in Multiple-Input Multiple-Output (MIMO) Orthogonal Frequency Division Multiplexing (OFDM) communication systems, with a focus on designing physical layer packets and preambles. It addresses initial channel estimation and synchronization challenges.
• Potential Anticipated Claim(s) of US10917272 (35 U.S.C. § 102): Unlikely to anticipate claims 1 or 11. While it relates to OFDM packet and preamble design, its focus on MIMO synchronization does not explicitly teach the variable header repetition scheme with different header bit ordering for different packet types as specifically claimed in US10917272.

2. US6567383B1

• Full Citation: US6567383B1, "Header structure for TDD systems," Sony International (Europe) Gmbh, published 2003-05-20.
• Publication/Filing Date: Filing: 1998-02-18 / Publication: 2003-05-20.
• Brief Description: This patent describes a header structure specifically designed for Time Division Duplex (TDD) systems, aiming to manage and signal various parameters within such communication frameworks.
• Potential Anticipated Claim(s) of US10917272 (35 U.S.C. § 102): Unlikely to anticipate claims 1 or 11. The patent's focus on TDD header structure does not inherently disclose variable header repetition for different packet types in an OFDM context, nor the critical feature of transmitting/receiving repeated header bits in a different order.

3. US6580713B1

• Full Citation: US6580713B1, "Radio communication apparatus and mobile radio communication system," Oki Electric Industry Co., Ltd., published 2003-06-17.
• Publication/Filing Date: Filing: 1998-01-23 / Publication: 2003-06-17.
• Brief Description: This patent describes a general radio communication apparatus and a mobile radio communication system, covering broad aspects of wireless communication.
• Potential Anticipated Claim(s) of US10917272 (35 U.S.C. § 102): Unlikely to anticipate claims 1 or 11. This appears to be a very general radio communication patent and lacks any specific details regarding OFDM header repetition, especially the variable levels and bit ordering of US10917272.

4. US6671284B1

• Full Citation: US6671284B1, "Frame control for efficient media access," Intellon Corporation, published 2003-12-30.
• Publication/Filing Date: Filing: 2000-08-04 / Publication: 2003-12-30.
• Brief Description: This patent describes mechanisms for frame control to achieve efficient media access in communication networks, potentially involving scheduling and resource management.
• Potential Anticipated Claim(s) of US10917272 (35 U.S.C. § 102): Unlikely to anticipate claims 1 or 11. While it deals with "frame control," it does not specify the unique variable OFDM header repetition with different bit ordering for different packet types that is central to US10917272.

5. EP1392025A2

• Full Citation: EP1392025A2, "Wireless communication method and wireless communication device," Kabushiki Kaisha Toyota Jidoshokki, published 2004-02-25.
• Publication/Filing Date: Filing: 2002-08-23 / Publication: 2004-02-25.
• Brief Description: This European patent application describes a generic wireless communication method and a corresponding wireless communication device.
• Potential Anticipated Claim(s) of US10917272 (35 U.S.C. § 102): Unlikely to anticipate claims 1 or 11. The broad title indicates a general scope that does not explicitly point to OFDM header repetition strategies with variable repetition levels and bit reordering.

6. US20040228269A1

• Full Citation: US20040228269A1, "Multi-band OFDM communications system," Jaiganesh Balakrishnan, published 2004-11-18.
• Publication/Filing Date: Filing: 2003-05-14 / Publication: 2004-11-18.
• Brief Description: This patent application describes a communication system that leverages multi-band Orthogonal Frequency Division Multiplexing (OFDM). This falls within the general technological domain of US10917272.
• Potential Anticipated Claim(s) of US10917272 (35 U.S.C. § 102): While it relates to OFDM and multiple bands, the title does not indicate the specific header repetition schemes, such as variable repetition for different packet types or the "different order" of repeated bits for reliability, as defined in claims 1 and 11 of US10917272. Therefore, it is unlikely to fully anticipate.

7. US20050135284A1

• Full Citation: US20050135284A1, "High speed media access control," Qualcomm Incorporated, published 2005-06-23.
• Publication/Filing Date: Filing: 2003-10-15 / Publication: 2005-06-23.
• Brief Description: This patent application focuses on designing high-speed media access control (MAC) mechanisms to enhance data throughput and channel efficiency in communication systems.
• Potential Anticipated Claim(s) of US10917272 (35 U.S.C. § 102): Unlikely to anticipate claims 1 or 11. Its focus is on the MAC layer and general high-speed access, rather than the physical layer header repetition with specific bit ordering as claimed in US10917272.

8. US20050135318A1

• Full Citation: US20050135318A1, "High speed media access control with legacy system interoperability," Qualcomm Incorporated, published 2005-06-23.
• Publication/Filing Date: Filing: 2003-10-15 / Publication: 2005-06-23.
• Brief Description: This patent application describes high-speed media access control mechanisms that are designed to also ensure seamless interoperability with existing legacy communication systems.
• Potential Anticipated Claim(s) of US10917272 (35 U.S.C. § 102): Unlikely to anticipate claims 1 or 11 for similar reasons as US20050135284A1; its focus on MAC and interoperability does not directly address the specific header repetition and ordering of US10917272.

9. US20050169261A1

• Full Citation: US20050169261A1, "Method of signaling the length of OFDM WLAN packets," Texas Instruments Incorporated, published 2005-08-04.
• Publication/Filing Date: Filing: 2004-02-03 / Publication: 2005-08-04.
• Brief Description: This patent application details a method for signaling the length of Orthogonal Frequency Division Multiplexing (OFDM) Wireless Local Area Network (WLAN) packets, a crucial piece of information typically found in a packet header.
• Potential Anticipated Claim(s) of US10917272 (35 U.S.C. § 102): While relevant to OFDM packet headers and information signaling, this patent focuses on signaling packet length. It does not disclose the specific variable header repetition levels for different packet types, nor the unique "different order" of repeated header bits for diversity as claimed in US10917272. Thus, it's unlikely to anticipate claims 1 or 11.

10. US20050180315A1

• Full Citation: US20050180315A1, "Orthogonal frequency division multiplexing (OFDM) method and apparatus for protecting and authenticating wirelessly transmitted digital information," Interdigital Technology Corporation, published 2005-08-18.
• Publication/Filing Date: Filing: 2004-01-13 / Publication: 2005-08-18.
• Brief Description: This patent application describes OFDM methods and corresponding apparatus for protecting and authenticating wirelessly transmitted digital information, likely encompassing error correction coding, encryption, or other security measures.
• Potential Anticipated Claim(s) of US10917272 (35 U.S.C. § 102): Unlikely to anticipate claims 1 or 11. Although it addresses OFDM and data protection, it does not disclose the specific variable header repetition scheme with different ordering of bits in repeated symbols as a means to achieve reliability, which is central to US10917272.

11. US20050195765A1

• Full Citation: US20050195765A1, "Dual carrier modulator for a multiband OFDM transceiver," Infineon Technologies Ag, published 2005-09-08.
• Publication/Filing Date: Filing: 2004-03-08 / Publication: 2005-09-08.
• Brief Description: This patent application describes a specific hardware component: a dual carrier modulator designed for use in multiband OFDM transceivers.
• Potential Anticipated Claim(s) of US10917272 (35 U.S.C. § 102): Unlikely to anticipate claims 1 or 11. This patent focuses on the modulation hardware aspect of multiband OFDM, but it does not address the higher-layer signaling or packet structure for variable header repetition and bit ordering as claimed in US10917272.

12. CN1941665A

• Full Citation: CN1941665A, "Method for realizing radio transit based on transfer station," Huawei Technologies Co., Ltd., published 2007-04-04.
• Publication/Filing Date: Filing: 2005-09-30 / Publication: 2007-04-04.
• Brief Description: This Chinese patent application describes a method for implementing radio transit (or relay communication) using a transfer station, focusing on network topology and routing.
• Potential Anticipated Claim(s) of US10917272 (35 U.S.C. § 102): Unlikely to anticipate claims 1 or 11. Its subject matter of radio relay communication does not directly address the specific header repetition techniques, variable levels, or unique bit ordering described in US10917272.

13. WO2007127311A2

• Full Citation: WO2007127311A2, "Method and signaling procedure for transmission opportunity usage in a wireless mesh network," Interdigital Technology Corporation, published 2007-11-08.
• Publication/Filing Date: Filing: 2006-04-24 / Publication: 2007-11-08.
• Brief Description: This PCT application describes methods and signaling procedures for managing and utilizing Transmission Opportunities (TXOPs) within a wireless mesh network environment. US10917272's specification mentions using TXOP descriptors to indicate the 'D' value (number of header OFDM symbols).
• Potential Anticipated Claim(s) of US10917272 (35 U.S.C. § 102): This patent potentially anticipates the broader concept of signaling transmission parameters, such as a repetition factor like 'D', within a TXOP descriptor in a MAP frame. This is mentioned in US10917272's specification as a way to communicate the selected 'D' value. However, it is highly unlikely to anticipate the specific details of the variable header repetition scheme for two distinct packet types, including the different bit ordering in repeated OFDM symbols, which is a critical feature of claims 1 and 11 of US10917272.

14. US20080184088A1

• Full Citation: US20080184088A1, "System and method for encoding and decoding in wireless communication systems," Via Telecom, Inc., published 2008-07-31.
• Publication/Filing Date: Filing: 2007-01-30 / Publication: 2008-07-31.
• Brief Description: This patent application describes general systems and methods for encoding and decoding data within wireless communication environments.
• Potential Anticipated Claim(s) of US10917272 (35 U.S.C. § 102): Unlikely to anticipate claims 1 or 11. This appears to be a broad patent on encoding/decoding techniques and does not disclose the specific variable header repetition with unique bit ordering of US10917272.

15. US20080219229A1

• Full Citation: US20080219229A1, "Wireless relay communication system and method," Huawei Technologies Co., Ltd., published 2008-09-11.
• Publication/Filing Date: Filing: 2005-09-30 / Publication: 2008-09-11.
• Brief Description: This patent application describes a system and method for wireless relay communication, focusing on extending network coverage or enhancing signal strength through intermediate relay nodes.
• Potential Anticipated Claim(s) of US10917272 (35 U.S.C. § 102): Unlikely to anticipate claims 1 or 11. Its focus on relay communication does not address the specific header repetition techniques, variable repetition levels, or the distinctive bit ordering of US10917272.

16. US20090086646A1

• Full Citation: US20090086646A1, "Status report method in a wireless communication system," Motorola, Inc., published 2009-04-02.
• Publication/Filing Date: Filing: 2007-10-01 / Publication: 2009-04-02.
• Brief Description: This patent application describes methods for generating and transmitting status reports within a wireless communication system.
• Potential Anticipated Claim(s) of US10917272 (35 U.S.C. § 102): Unlikely to anticipate claims 1 or 11. Status reporting is a higher-layer function and not directly related to the physical layer header repetition and bit ordering details specified in US10917272's claims.

17. US20090290563A1

• Full Citation: US20090290563A1, "Antenna/Beam Selection Training in MIMO Wireless LANs with Different Sounding Frames," Daqing Gu, published 2009-11-26.
• Publication/Filing Date: Filing: 2005-11-21 / Publication: 2009-11-26.
• Brief Description: This patent application describes techniques for selecting optimal antennas or beams and performing training in MIMO Wireless LANs, particularly utilizing different types of sounding frames for channel estimation.
• Potential Anticipated Claim(s) of US10917272 (35 U.S.C. § 102): Unlikely to anticipate claims 1 or 11. Its focus on MIMO training and sounding frames does not address the specific header repetition scheme, variable levels, or unique bit ordering for diversity as claimed in US10917272.

18. US20100085964A1

• Full Citation: US20100085964A1, "Communications system and method," Alexander Weir, published 2010-04-08.
• Publication/Filing Date: Filing: 2006-08-22 / Publication: 2010-04-08.
• Brief Description: This patent application broadly describes a communications system and method, covering general principles of data transmission.
• Potential Anticipated Claim(s) of US10917272 (35 U.S.C. § 102): Unlikely to anticipate claims 1 or 11 due to its very broad title and lack of specific details concerning header repetition strategies, variable levels, or bit reordering.

19. US20100158046A1

• Full Citation: US20100158046A1, "Method and apparatus for generating data packets for transmission in an ofdm communication system," Nxp, B.V., published 2010-06-24.
• Publication/Filing Date: Filing: 2006-10-02 / Publication: 2010-06-24.
• Brief Description: This patent application describes methods and apparatus specifically for generating data packets for transmission within an OFDM communication system.
• Potential Anticipated Claim(s) of US10917272 (35 U.S.C. § 102): This reference is more relevant as it directly addresses "generating data packets for transmission in an OFDM communication system." However, without a detailed review of its content, it is unlikely to explicitly disclose the specific combination of variable header repetition levels for different packet types and, critically, the "different order" of repeated header bits in successive OFDM symbols as defined in claims 1 and 11 of US10917272. It might teach general packet generation, but the unique ordering aspect would be key to anticipation.

20. US20100208594A1

• Full Citation: US20100208594A1, "Method for inserting parity to frame control header," Yeong Hyeon Kwon, published 2010-08-19.
• Publication/Filing Date: Filing: 2007-11-14 / Publication: 2010-08-19.
• Brief Description: This patent application describes a method for enhancing reliability by inserting parity bits into a frame control header, primarily for error detection or correction purposes.
• Potential Anticipated Claim(s) of US10917272 (35 U.S.C. § 102): Unlikely to anticipate claims 1 or 11. While it deals with header reliability (via parity), it does not teach variable header repetition using a different number of OFDM symbols for different packet types, nor the distinctive "different order" of repeated header bits for diversity.

21. US20100260137A1

• Full Citation: US20100260137A1, "Methods and systems for channelization," Nortel Networks Limited, published 2010-10-14.
• Publication/Filing Date: Filing: 2007-11-07 / Publication: 2010-10-14.
• Brief Description: This patent application describes methods and systems related to channelization, which involves dividing communication bandwidth into multiple channels for efficient data transmission.
• Potential Anticipated Claim(s) of US10917272 (35 U.S.C. § 102): Unlikely to anticipate claims 1 or 11. Channelization techniques are generally distinct from the specific header repetition patterns and bit ordering claimed in US10917272.

22. US20100265398A1

• Full Citation: US20100265398A1, "Systems and methods for transmitting media content via digital radio broadcast transmission for synchronized rendering by a receiver," Ibiquity Digital Corporation, published 2010-10-21.
• Publication/Filing Date: Filing: 2009-04-15 / Publication: 2010-10-21.
• Brief Description: This patent application describes systems and methods focused on transmitting media content through digital radio broadcast and ensuring its synchronized rendering at the receiver.
• Potential Anticipated Claim(s) of US10917272 (35 U.S.C. § 102): Unlikely to anticipate claims 1 or 11. Its primary focus on media broadcasting and synchronization does not directly relate to the specific variable header repetition, levels, or bit ordering described in US10917272.

23. US8266488B2

• Full Citation: US8266488B2, "Encoding and decoding systems with header and data transmission success indication," Marvell Israel (MIL) Ltd., published 2012-09-11.
• Publication/Filing Date: Filing: 2007-03-26 / Publication: 2012-09-11.
• Brief Description: This patent describes encoding and decoding systems designed to provide indications of successful transmission of both header and data portions of a communication. This is relevant to the general goal of header reliability.
• Potential Anticipated Claim(s) of US10917272 (35 U.S.C. § 102): While this patent addresses header reliability, its abstract does not indicate the specific variable header repetition levels for different packet types (e.g., 2 vs. 4 OFDM symbols) or the crucial "different order" of repeated header bits in successive OFDM symbols as described in claims 1 and 11. It likely focuses on other forms of error detection/correction or signaling success.

24. US9584262B2

• Full Citation: US9584262B2, "Method and apparatus for variable header repetition in a wireless OFDM network with multiple overlapped frequency bands," Applied Transform, Llc, published 2017-02-28.
• Publication/Filing Date: Filing: 2010-08-20 (Parent Filing Date: 2009-08-21) / Publication: 2017-02-28.
• Brief Description: This patent describes methods and apparatus for variable header repetition within a wireless OFDM network, particularly for scenarios involving multiple overlapped frequency bands. Critically, US10917272 traces its priority back to a provisional application filed on August 21, 2009, entitled “Header Repetition Scheme in Packet-Based OFDM Systems.” US9584262B2 shares this same earliest priority date and original assignee (Applied Transform LLC). It is explicitly a family member, with US10917272 being a continuation in a long chain stemming from the same initial inventive disclosure.
• Potential Anticipated Claim(s) of US10917272 (35 U.S.C. § 102): US9584262B2 is a related patent within the same patent family (sharing the same priority date of 2009-08-21) and is therefore not considered prior art under 35 U.S.C. § 102 for US10917272. They stem from the same original inventive concept.

---

Most Relevant Prior Art Summary:

Based on the titles and brief descriptions, no single cited prior art reference appears to fully anticipate the specific combination of features claimed in US10917272, particularly the dual packet types with different header repetition levels (2 vs. 4 OFDM symbols) coupled with the crucial aspect of transmitting/receiving repeated header bits in a different order in successive OFDM symbols for the higher repetition packet type.

The most contextually relevant citations, though not necessarily anticipatory of the specific claim language, are:

• WO2007127311A2: This patent is relevant for its discussion of signaling transmission parameters within a TXOP descriptor, a mechanism also mentioned in US10917272 for communicating the chosen repetition factor 'D'. However, it does not detail the specific header structure and bit ordering.
• US20100158046A1: This reference's focus on "generating data packets for transmission in an OFDM communication system" places it in the general domain of the invention, but specific details of variable header repetition and different ordering are not apparent from its title.

The uniqueness of US10917272's claims seems to lie in the combination of variable header repetition levels for different packet types and the reordering of identical header bits across repeated OFDM symbols to enhance diversity and reliability. No single prior art reference from the provided list clearly teaches this specific combination.

The analysis below identifies combinations of prior art references that would render the claims of US Patent 10,917,272 obvious under 35 U.S.C. § 103, along with the motivation for a person having ordinary skill in the art (PHOSITA) to combine them.

The core of US Patent 10,917,272's independent claims (Claim 1 for transmission, Claim 11 for reception) revolves around a non-transitory computer-readable information storage medium that enables:

1. Two Packet Types: A first type with a header field using two distinct parts (different header bits) over two OFDM symbols, and a second type with a header field using four parts, where the first two parts repeat a first set of header bits and the last two parts repeat a second set of header bits.
2. Repetition with Different Order: For the second packet type, the repeated sets of header bits (e.g., the second OFDM symbol compared to the first, and the fourth OFDM symbol compared to the third) are transmitted or received in a different order.
3. Wireless OFDM Network Context: All within a wireless Orthogonal Frequency Division Multiplexing (OFDM) network.

Prior Art References for Obviousness Analysis

The patent itself discusses and cites several highly relevant prior art documents and technical discussions in its "Background" and "Summary" sections, which reveal the state of the art and the problems the inventors sought to solve:

1. ITU G.9960 ("ITU-T Recommendation G.9960: Next generation wire-line based home networking transceivers—Foundation," January 2009): This standard is explicitly mentioned as defining that "the header containing PHY H bits (header information block) is carried over one or two OFDM symbols (D=1 or 2), and within each symbol, multiple header information blocks are repeated over the entire frequency band." It also states that the "default value of D is 1, but expanding it to 2 in some cases is under discussion." Furthermore, G.9960 emphasizes that it is "essential to decode the header reliably".
2. "G.hn: PHY-Frame Header Extension" (ITU Temporary Document ITU-T SG-15/Q4 09CC-046, August 2009): This document, also cited in the patent's background, discusses the "possibility of carrying more than PHY H bits in the header (H=1 or 2)", implying the concept of an extended header (e.g., "Header Ext" as shown in FIG. 1 of the patent).
3. "G.hn: Using Two Symbols for the Header of PHY Frame on Coax" (ITU Temporary Document ITU-T 5G15/Q4 09XC-100, July 2009): This document, similar to 09CC-046, is noted for discussing the expansion of 'D' to 2.
4. Common General Knowledge in OFDM/Wireless Communications: It is a fundamental and well-known principle in wireless communication systems, especially those employing OFDM, that applying interleaving, scrambling, or reordering of data bits across redundant transmissions (e.g., in different time slots or different frequency subcarriers for repeated data) significantly enhances diversity gain and robustness against channel impairments such as frequency-selective fading and interference. This technique was widely understood and applied prior to the priority date of US10917272 (August 21, 2009).

Obviousness Combination and Rationale for Independent Claims 1 and 11

Combination: ITU G.9960 + "G.hn: PHY-Frame Header Extension" (09CC-046) + Common General Knowledge of Interleaving/Diversity.

Rationale for Combination:

A PHOSITA would have been motivated to combine these references to address the acknowledged challenges in reliable header decoding in OFDM networks, particularly in heterogeneous environments. The patent itself highlights the problem that "the level of frequency diversity is different depending on the bandplan, hence providing different header decodability if D is fixed to 1. If D is fixed to 2, then it increases reliability for the narrowband devices, but may also unnecessarily increase overhead for the wide-band devices." This problem statement, combined with the explicit discussions in the G.hn documents, would drive a PHOSITA to the claimed solution.

1. Variable Repetition of Header Information (Two vs. Four OFDM Symbols):

   • G.9960 explicitly teaches transmitting headers using one or two OFDM symbols (D=1 or 2). This establishes the concept of variable header repetition factors.
   • "G.hn: PHY-Frame Header Extension" introduces the concept of an extended header (H=1 or 2), meaning the header information itself can comprise multiple distinct parts (e.g., a "Header" and a "Header Ext" as depicted in FIG. 1 of US10917272).
   • Combining these, a PHOSITA would readily envision a scenario where an extended header (H=2, meaning two different parts) could be transmitted:
     • With D=1: Each of the two header parts occupies one OFDM symbol, totaling two OFDM symbols for the header. This directly corresponds to the "first packet type" of Claims 1 and 11, where the "first part comprising a first set of header bits... and a second part comprising a second set of header bits... different than the second set" are transmitted using a first and second OFDM symbol, respectively.
     • With D=2: Each of the two header parts is repeated twice over OFDM symbols. This would result in a total of four OFDM symbols dedicated to the header (e.g., first header part in symbol 1, same first header part in symbol 2; second header part in symbol 3, same second header part in symbol 4). This directly corresponds to the "second packet type" of Claims 1 and 11, where the first set of header bits is repeated (first and second parts of the second header field), and the third set of header bits is repeated (third and fourth parts of the second header field). The patent's own description of FIG. 1 states that "the second instance of a block with the same label is a copy of the prior block."

2. Repetition with Different Order for Diversity:

   • G.9960 emphasizes the "essential" need for reliable header decoding. The patent's background further notes the varying levels of "frequency diversity" across different bandplans affecting decodability.
   • Given the objective of enhancing reliability, and knowing that repetition (as taught by G.9960 for D=2) provides redundancy, a PHOSITA would consider how to maximize the benefit of this repetition. It is common general knowledge in wireless communication that simply repeating bits in the exact same order offers some redundancy but may not fully leverage channel diversity. Reordering or interleaving bits across repeated transmissions (e.g., the second OFDM symbol compared to the first, or the fourth compared to the third for the repeated header parts) is a standard and well-understood technique to achieve robust frequency diversity. This ensures that even if certain frequency subcarriers are affected by deep fades in one symbol, the reordered data in the subsequent, redundant symbol has a higher chance of being transmitted over different, more favorable subcarriers, thus increasing the probability of successful decoding.
   • Motivation: A PHOSITA, aiming to improve the "likelihood of correctly communicating header information" (as stated in dependent claims 2, 3, 8, 9, 12, 13, 18, 19), would be motivated to apply this known diversity-enhancing technique to the repeated header OFDM symbols described in G.9960 and its extensions. The phrase in the patent, "The modulation of the copied block may not be exactly the same as the original version", and the claim's "different order" are direct applications of this common general knowledge.

Obviousness of Dependent Claims

• Claims 2, 3, 8, 9, 12, 13, 18, 19 (Diversity for Reliability): These claims state that the transmission/reception of the same header bits in a different order provides diversity to increase the likelihood of correct communication. This is the inherent and well-understood benefit of interleaving/reordering for diversity, making these claims obvious once the "different order" aspect is considered obvious.
• Claims 4, 14 (SmartGrid Applications): The patent states, "The possibility of having narrower bandplans such as 25 MHz-PB and 12.5 MHz-PB are under discussion in order to support, for example, SmartGrid applications." Since the problem of diverse bandplans drove the need for variable header repetition, applying the solution to the identified use case of SmartGrid applications would be an obvious design choice for a PHOSITA.
• Claims 5, 15 (Support for Wireless Standards): The background already identifies IEEE 802.11, IEEE 802.16 (WiMAX), and ITU G.9960 as relevant standards for OFDM systems. Implementing the header repetition scheme within the context of supporting such known wireless standards is a straightforward and obvious application.
• Claims 6, 16 (MAP Frame Indicating D): The patent's summary explicitly mentions, "An exemplary technique is to include D in the TXOP descriptor transmitted in the MAP so that all nodes know in advance what value of D is used for that TXOP." The use of MAP (Media Access Plan) frames and TXOP (Transmission Opportunity) descriptors for conveying control information in managed wireless networks (like WiMAX, mentioned in the background) is conventional. Therefore, signaling the dynamically chosen header repetition factor 'D' (which dictates 2 or 4 OFDM symbols for header information) within a MAP frame's TXOP descriptor would be an obvious implementation detail for managing variable header repetition in a network.
• Claims 7, 17 (Different Channel Bandwidths): The patent clearly articulates the problem related to different bandwidths: "For the power-line medium, G.9960 has defined two overlapped baseband bandplans, 50 MHz-PB and 100 MHz-PB. The possibility of having narrower bandplans such as 25 MHz-PB and 12.5 MHz-PB are under discussion... the level of frequency diversity is different depending on the bandplan, hence providing different header decodability if D is fixed to 1." Applying the variable repetition scheme (less robust for wider bandwidths, more robust for narrower bandwidths) to optimize performance across different channel bandwidths is a direct and obvious response to this identified problem.
• Claims 10, 20 (Communication Between Different Transceivers): The patent is directed to "multi-user communications systems" and a "domain where nodes are operating in different portions of frequency bands." It is inherently obvious that different packet types with varying header repetition schemes would be used for communication between different transceivers in such a multi-user environment, based on their capabilities or channel conditions.

In summary, the specific configurations of header repetition, the use of extended headers, and the application of bit reordering for diversity, particularly in the context of different channel bandwidths and signaling via MAP frames, would have been obvious to a PHOSITA by combining the teachings of ITU G.9960 and its associated G.hn temporary documents with common general knowledge in wireless OFDM system design.

For US Patent 10,917,272, the following details regarding its term, family members, and application types have been identified from the provided authoritative patent text:

Patent Term Adjustments (PTA) / Patent Term Extensions (PTE):
The patent's "Anticipated expiration" date is listed as 2030-08-20. The earliest non-provisional filing date in the chain of applications, from which the patent term is typically calculated (20 years), is the international filing date of PCT Application No. PCT/US2010/046088, which is 2010-08-20. As the anticipated expiration date (2030-08-20) is exactly 20 years from this earliest non-provisional filing date, it indicates that there were either no patent term adjustments (PTA) or patent term extensions (PTE) that extended the patent's term, or any such adjustments resulted in a net zero change to the standard 20-year term. The patent text does not explicitly detail any specific PTA or PTE calculations.

Continuation Applications:
US Patent 10,917,272 is part of a long chain of continuation applications. The patent itself is a continuation of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 16/394,490, filed April 25, 2019 (now U.S. Pat. No. 10,554,459). This chain extends backward through multiple continuations to PCT Application No. PCT/US2010/046088, which was filed on August 20, 2010, and claims the benefit of U.S. Patent Application No. 61/235,909, filed August 21, 2009 (provisional application).

The chain of continuation applications leading to US10917272 includes:

• U.S. patent application Ser. No. 16/394,490 (U.S. Pat. No. 10,554,459)
• U.S. patent application Ser. No. 16/125,206 (U.S. Pat. No. 10,291,449)
• U.S. patent application Ser. No. 15/958,519 (U.S. Pat. No. 10,079,707)
• U.S. patent application Ser. No. 15/476,284 (U.S. Pat. No. 9,973,361)
• U.S. patent application Ser. No. 15/350,418 (U.S. Pat. No. 9,614,566)
• U.S. patent application Ser. No. 13/376,856 (U.S. Pat. No. 9,584,262)
• PCT Application No. PCT/US2010/046088

Divisional Applications:
The provided patent text does not explicitly mention any divisional applications related to US10917272. The relationship between the applications is consistently described as a "continuation of" in the "RELATED APPLICATION DATA" section.

Related Family Members:
The patent is part of a larger patent family (Family ID=43297064) which includes numerous continuation applications. Beyond the direct chain of continuations mentioned above, other related applications in this family, all stemming from the same priority date of 2009-08-21 (via the PCT filing), include:

• US17/136,801 (US11212146B2) - Filed 2020-12-29
• US17/540,189 (US11646927B2) - Filed 2021-12-01
• US17/539,814 (US11469934B2) - Filed 2021-12-01
• US17/939,904 (US11777776B2) - Filed 2022-09-07
• US18/234,879 (US12063134B2) - Filed 2023-08-17
• US18/766,636 (US12615176B2) - Filed 2024-07-08

Projected Expiration Date:
The projected expiration date for US Patent 10,917,272 is 2030-08-20.

Defensive Disclosure: Enhancements to Variable Header Repetition in Wireless OFDM Networks

This document describes various derivative works and technical disclosures building upon the principles outlined in US Patent 10,917,272, concerning variable header repetition in wireless Orthogonal Frequency Division Multiplexing (OFDM) networks. These disclosures aim to establish prior art for potential future incremental improvements, rendering them obvious or non-novel, thereby strengthening defensive positioning. The date of this disclosure is April 26, 2026.

Core Claim Analysis Reference:

For clarity, the following disclosures expand upon the fundamental concepts of US Patent 10,917,272, particularly independent Claim 1 (method of transmission) and Claim 11 (method of reception). These claims describe transmitting/receiving a first packet type with a two-part header (two OFDM symbols, different header bits) and a second packet type with a four-part header (four OFDM symbols, repeated header bits with different ordering for diversity).

---

Derivatives of Claim 1 (Method of Transmission)

1. Material & Component Substitution: Millimeter-Wave GaN-based Transceiver with FPGA-accelerated Header Processing

Enabling Description:
This derivative implements the variable header repetition scheme using a transceiver optimized for millimeter-wave (mmWave) frequencies (e.g., 28 GHz or 60 GHz bands). The RF front-end utilizes Gallium Nitride (GaN) high-electron-mobility transistors (HEMTs) for the power amplifier and low-noise amplifier stages, enabling high output power and efficiency at these frequencies. The baseband processing, including OFDM symbol generation, header assembly, encoding, modulation, and the specific reordering of header bits for diversity (as per Claim 1), is offloaded to a field-programmable gate array (FPGA) fabric (e.g., Xilinx Versal ACAP or Intel Agilex). This FPGA-based acceleration allows for real-time, ultra-low-latency header processing and dynamic adjustment of header repetition parameter 'D' and header content 'H' based on instantaneous channel quality indicators (CQI) and available subcarrier bandwidth. The non-transitory computer-readable storage media comprises high-speed static random-access memory (SRAM) integrated directly onto the FPGA or co-packaged, storing the firmware for header generation and repetition logic.

graph TD
    A[Controller/Processor] -- Controls --> B(MAP Determination/Processing Module)
    B -- Defines D, H --> C{Header Assembly Module}
    C -- Header Bits --> D[FPGA Encoder]
    D -- Encoded Header --> E[FPGA Modulator]
    E -- Modulated OFDM Symbols (D=2 or D=4) --> F(GaN RF Front-End)
    F -- Transmits mmWave Signal --> G[Wireless Communication Channel]
    E -- Includes Bit Reordering Logic --> E
    C -- Specifies Different Header Parts --> C

2. Operational Parameter Expansion: Ultra-Low Frequency (ULF) Underwater Acoustic Communication with Extended Packet & Symbol Durations

Enabling Description:
This derivative adapts the variable header repetition to an Ultra-Low Frequency (ULF) underwater acoustic communication network (e.g., 300 Hz - 3 kHz band). Given the severe attenuation and multipath effects, as well as extremely low propagation speeds in water, OFDM symbols and packet durations are significantly extended, often spanning hundreds of milliseconds to several seconds per symbol. The transceiver employs piezoelectric transducers for acoustic signal generation and reception. The processors are ultra-low-power embedded systems (e.g., ARM Cortex-M series) designed for prolonged battery operation in autonomous underwater vehicles (AUVs) or subsea sensors. The non-transitory storage media consists of robust NOR flash memory. Header repetition (D=2 or D=4) is crucial for reliability over extremely long acoustic paths and dynamic ocean environments. The "different order" modulation of repeated header bits involves spreading across a wider time-frequency block within the ULF band to maximize temporal and frequency diversity against fading and noise. The encoding scheme uses robust low-density parity-check (LDPC) codes.

graph TD
    A[ULF Transceiver Controller] -- Configures --> B(Header Assembly Module)
    B -- ULF Header Bits --> C{LDPC Encoder}
    C -- Encoded Header --> D[Piezoelectric Modulator]
    D -- Long Duration ULF OFDM Symbols (D=2 or D=4) --> E(Underwater Acoustic Channel)
    D -- Different Order Spreading --> D
    E -- Received by --> F[ULF Demodulator]
    F -- Decodes --> G{LDPC Decoder}
    G -- Extracts Header --> H[Controller/Processor]

3. Cross-Domain Application: Industrial IoT for Predictive Maintenance in Heavy Machinery

Enabling Description:
This application utilizes the variable header repetition scheme within a wireless Industrial IoT (IIoT) network for real-time predictive maintenance data acquisition from heavy machinery (e.g., mining equipment, factory robots). Transceivers are integrated into vibration, temperature, and pressure sensors. The "first packet type" (D=2) is used for routine health status updates in stable conditions, where the two distinct header parts convey sensor ID and timestamp. The "second packet type" (D=4) is triggered when anomalies are detected (e.g., high vibration, overheating), signaling critical event data. The repeated header bits in different orders provide robust communication of fault codes and immediate operational state changes, even in environments with high electromagnetic interference (EMI) from industrial motors and power lines. The wireless OFDM network operates on a license-free ISM band (e.g., 2.4 GHz or 5 GHz). The communication channel involves short-range, dynamic links within a noisy industrial environment.

graph TD
    A[Industrial Sensor Node] -- Detects Anomaly/Routine --> B{Controller/Packet Generator}
    B -- Routine Packet (Type 1) --> C[Header Assembly D=2]
    B -- Anomaly Packet (Type 2) --> D[Header Assembly D=4, Reordered]
    C -- Encodes & Modulates --> E(OFDM Transceiver)
    D -- Encodes & Modulates --> E
    E -- Transmits --> F[Industrial Wireless Channel (ISM)]
    F -- Received by --> G(Central Gateway)
    G -- Processes based on Header Type --> H[Predictive Maintenance System]

4. Integration with Emerging Tech: AI-Optimized Header Repetition for Autonomous Vehicle V2X Communication

Enabling Description:
This derivative integrates AI-driven optimization into the variable header repetition for Vehicle-to-Everything (V2X) communication in autonomous driving. Each autonomous vehicle (AV) acts as a transceiver. An on-board AI/Machine Learning (ML) module continuously analyzes real-time channel conditions (e.g., signal-to-noise ratio, interference levels, vehicle speed, weather), road traffic density, and criticality of transmitted information (e.g., collision warning vs. traffic flow update). The AI dynamically adjusts the 'D' value (number of header OFDM symbols, 2 or 4) and the specific bit-ordering permutation for the repeated header parts to optimize reliability and minimize overhead. For instance, in high-speed, high-interference scenarios (e.g., highway intersections with multiple AVs), D=4 with an AI-selected optimal interleaving pattern is used. In benign, low-speed platooning, D=2 is chosen. The "different order" for repeated header bits (claims 1 and 11) is actively determined by the AI to maximize diversity gain against predicted channel impairments. The non-transitory media stores the AI model and adaptive algorithms.

graph TD
    A[Real-time Channel Data] --> B{AI/ML Optimization Engine}
    C[Traffic/Context Data] --> B
    B -- Optimal D & Reordering Pattern --> D(Header Assembly Module)
    D -- Generates Packet Type 1 or 2 --> E[OFDM Transceiver]
    E -- Transmits V2X Communication --> F(Wireless V2X Channel)
    F -- Received by --> G[Neighboring AVs]

5. The "Inverse" or Failure Mode: Graceful Degradation of Header Repetition in Low-Power/Congested Modes

Enabling Description:
This derivative describes a low-power or congested-network mode for the variable header repetition system. When a transceiver detects critically low battery levels or extreme channel congestion (e.g., sensing high channel utilization or experiencing frequent retransmissions), it transitions to a "limited-functionality" mode. In this mode, the system primarily uses the "first packet type" (D=2) even for data that would normally warrant D=4, to conserve energy and reduce airtime. Furthermore, a simplified bit reordering algorithm is employed for the second header part, prioritizing only the most critical header fields (ee.g., packet type, source/destination address) for repetition and reordering, while less critical fields might be transmitted only once or with a fixed, less robust ordering. If a receiver fails to decode the D=2 header, it is designed to explicitly request retransmission or fall back to a predefined default communication scheme, rather than attempting to decode D=4, thus conserving its own power. The system may also implement a "safe shutdown" header, using D=4 with maximal diversity and a predefined, universally understood ordering to signal an imminent node failure or exit from the network, ensuring this critical message is received reliably.

stateDiagram
    [*] --> Normal_Op: Power_On
    Normal_Op --> Low_Power_Mode: Low_Battery_Detected
    Normal_Op --> Congestion_Mode: High_Channel_Util
    Low_Power_Mode --> Normal_Op: Battery_Charged
    Congestion_Mode --> Normal_Op: Channel_Cleared
    Low_Power_Mode --> Safe_Shutdown: Critical_Battery
    Congestion_Mode --> Safe_Shutdown: Persistent_Congestion
    Safe_Shutdown --> [*]: Power_Off

    Normal_Op: Use D=2 or D=4 (Optimized)
    Low_Power_Mode: Prioritize D=2, Minimal Reordering
    Congestion_Mode: Prioritize D=2, Adapt Reordering to Maximize Throughput
    Safe_Shutdown: Force D=4, Universal Reordering for Critical Info

---

Derivatives of Claim 11 (Method of Reception)

1. Material & Component Substitution: Quantum-Dot Photodetector-based Receiver with Neuromorphic Processor for Terahertz Communication

Enabling Description:
This derivative applies the variable header reception scheme to a Terahertz (THz) wireless communication system (e.g., 0.1 THz - 10 THz band). The receiver employs arrays of epitaxially grown quantum-dot photodetectors (QD-PDs) for THz signal conversion, coupled with plasmonic antennas for efficient THz coupling. Demodulation and header decoding, including the detection of D=2 and D=4 header types and the reconstruction of reordered header bits, are performed by a neuromorphic processor (e.g., Intel Loihi or IBM TrueNorth). This processor's event-driven, massively parallel architecture excels at pattern recognition, making it highly efficient for identifying and combining the repeated, differently ordered header bit streams. The non-transitory computer-readable information storage media is embedded ferroelectric RAM (FeRAM) co-integrated with the neuromorphic chip, providing non-volatile, high-speed storage for header processing algorithms and learned optimal decoding strategies.

graph TD
    A[THz Signal Input] --> B(Quantum-Dot Photodetector Array)
    B -- Converted Electrical Signal --> C[Analog-to-Digital Converter]
    C -- Digital Samples --> D{Neuromorphic Demodulator}
    D -- Detects D=2 or D=4 Header --> E[Neuromorphic Decoder]
    E -- Reconstructs Reordered Bits --> F(Header Output to Application)
    D -- Adapts to Reordering Patterns --> D

2. Operational Parameter Expansion: Deep-Space Communication with Millisecond-Pulsar Timing for Synchronization

Enabling Description:
This derivative extends the reception method to deep-space communication over interplanetary or interstellar distances, where signal propagation delays are immense (minutes to hours) and signal-to-noise ratios (SNRs) are extremely low. The receiver system is a massive radio telescope array, leveraging coherent integration over extended periods. Synchronization for OFDM symbol and packet reception is achieved using precise timing signals derived from observations of known millisecond pulsars. The 'D' parameter (header repetition) is often set to D=4, and even higher values (e.g., D=8, D=16) are optionally supported, providing extreme diversity for critical command and control headers. The "different order" for repeated header bits (claim 11) is pre-configured and optimized to decorrelate errors across the highly attenuated and noisy deep-space channel, maximizing the probability of successful header recovery. The demodulator and decoder are implemented on massively parallel processing clusters using advanced error-correction codes (e.g., Turbo codes, concatenated codes) optimized for ultra-low SNR.

graph TD
    A[Deep-Space RF Signal] --> B(Radio Telescope Array)
    B -- Coherently Integrated Signal --> C{Ultra-Low SNR Demodulator}
    D[Millisecond Pulsar Timing Reference] --> C
    C -- Raw OFDM Symbols --> E[Massively Parallel Decoder Cluster]
    E -- Detects D=2/4/8/16 Header --> F(Header Reconstruction & Command Parser)
    E -- Handles Reordered Bits --> E

3. Cross-Domain Application: Biomedical Implant Communication for Real-time Biosensor Data

Enabling Description:
This derivative applies the variable header reception to wireless communication with biomedical implants (e.g., continuous glucose monitors, neural implants, pacemakers). The receiver is an external wearable device or a bedside monitor. The implants transmit vital biosensor data using ultra-low-power radio (e.g., in the Medical Implant Communication Service (MICS) band, 402-405 MHz). The "first packet type" (D=2 header) is used for routine, non-critical parameter reporting. The "second packet type" (D=4 header) is automatically triggered by the implant upon detection of critical physiological events (e.g., arrhythmias, hypoglycemic episodes) to ensure highly reliable transmission of alerts and immediate health data. The external receiver's demodulator and decoder are highly sensitive, capable of detecting and reconstructing headers from weak implant signals. The reception of repeated, differently ordered header bits (Claim 11) is essential for robust operation within the human body, which acts as a complex and variable propagation medium. The system is designed to prioritize the D=4 packets for immediate processing and alert generation.

graph TD
    A[Biomedical Implant (Transmitter)] -- Transmits ULP RF --> B(Wireless Channel - Human Body)
    B -- Received by --> C{External Receiver Module}
    C -- Demodulates OFDM Symbols --> D[Header Processing Unit]
    D -- Detects Packet Type (D=2 or D=4) --> E[Header Reconstruction Logic]
    E -- Handles Reordered Bits --> E
    E -- Outputs Biosensor Data/Alerts --> F(Medical Monitoring System)

4. Integration with Emerging Tech: IoT Edge Gateway with Federated Learning for Adaptive Header Decoding

Enabling Description:
This derivative implements the variable header reception on an IoT edge gateway, which aggregates data from numerous heterogeneous IoT sensors. The gateway incorporates a federated learning (FL) module. As the gateway receives packets from various sensors using the D=2 or D=4 header schemes, the FL module continuously learns optimal demodulation and decoding parameters (e.g., channel estimation weights, bit-ordering inversion patterns, error correction strengths) based on the observed performance and channel conditions of the entire sensor network. This learning happens locally at the gateway, avoiding raw data transfer to a central cloud, enhancing privacy and reducing latency. For the "second packet type" (D=4), the receiver's demodulator and decoder (Claim 11) use the FL-optimized bit-ordering inversion patterns to reconstruct the header bits, dynamically adapting to changing environmental factors (e.g., new interference sources, sensor mobility). If initial decoding of a D=2 header fails, the FL module can rapidly estimate the likelihood of success with D=4 based on historical data and direct the receiver to attempt a D=4 decode, effectively leveraging learned patterns for adaptive header processing.

graph TD
    A[IoT Sensor (Tx)] -- Sends Header (D=2 or D=4) --> B(Wireless IoT Channel)
    B -- Received by --> C{IoT Edge Gateway}
    C -- Feeds Channel/Decode Metrics --> D(Federated Learning Module)
    D -- Updates Optimal Params --> C
    C -- Adaptive Demodulator --> E[Adaptive Decoder]
    E -- Reconstructs Header Bits (Handles Reordering) --> F(Data Aggregation/Processing)

5. The "Inverse" or Failure Mode: Forensic Header Reconstruction in Post-Mortem Analysis of Network Incidents

Enabling Description:
This derivative focuses on the "inverse" operation for forensic analysis of network incidents or failures. A specialized receiver/analyzer is designed to perform "post-mortem" header reconstruction from recorded raw RF spectrum captures. Instead of real-time operation, this system operates offline on stored data. When analyzing a data stream where a transmission failure occurred, the analyzer meticulously attempts to decode headers using both D=2 and D=4 logic (Claim 11). For particularly corrupted or truncated packets, it employs advanced signal processing and pattern matching algorithms (e.g., Bayesian inference, neural networks trained on expected header patterns) to infer the correct header content, even if some OFDM symbols are completely lost or severely degraded. For the "second packet type," the system exhaustively tries known and plausible bit reordering sequences to reconstruct the original header, thereby determining the intended packet type and parameters before the transmission failed. This allows for root cause analysis of communication breakdowns by reliably extracting control information from otherwise unrecoverable data.

graph TD
    A[Recorded Raw RF Spectrum Data] --> B(Offline Signal Processor)
    B -- Extracts OFDM Symbols --> C{Forensic Demodulator}
    C -- Attempts D=2 Decode --> D[Attempted Header 1]
    C -- Attempts D=4 Decode (with Reordering Trials) --> E[Attempted Header 2]
    D -- Feeds to --> F(Pattern Matching / Inference Engine)
    E -- Feeds to --> F
    F -- Outputs --> G[Reconstructed Header / Failure Analysis Report]

---

Combination Prior Art Scenarios with Open-Source Standards

These scenarios demonstrate how the variable header repetition mechanisms described in US10917272 could be combined with existing open-source standards, suggesting obviousness for such integrations.

1. IEEE 802.11ay (Wi-Fi 60 GHz) with Adaptive Header Repetition:

   • Standard: IEEE 802.11ay specifies enhancements for 60 GHz Wi-Fi, including channel aggregation and improved beamforming. While 802.11 defines packet preambles and headers, explicit variable header repetition as in US10917272 is not a core feature.
   • Combination: Integrating the variable header repetition of US10917272 into 802.11ay's physical (PHY) layer. The 802.11ay control frame (e.g., Short Packet header) could include a field indicating the 'D' value (2 or 4 OFDM symbols) for subsequent data packets. For short, latency-critical control messages or in challenging mmWave propagation environments (e.g., non-line-of-sight), a D=4 header (with reordered bits for diversity) would be used. For longer data packets in stable channels, D=2 could be employed to reduce overhead. This would be a natural extension for improving reliability in variable mmWave conditions, especially as 802.11ay aims for robust connections.
   • Enabling Description: An 802.11ay-compliant transceiver's PHY layer processing unit would be modified to include a header assembly module (similar to 220 in US10917272) that can generate either a 2-OFDM-symbol header or a 4-OFDM-symbol header with internal bit reordering. A new bit field within the 802.11ay Control Field or Service field of the PHY header would signal the chosen 'D' value to the receiver. The receiver's 802.11ay PHY demodulator would interpret this field to determine how many subsequent OFDM symbols comprise the header and then apply the corresponding de-reordering and decoding logic.

2. LoRaWAN (Long Range Wide Area Network) with Critical Header Redundancy:

   • Standard: LoRaWAN is a low-power, wide-area network (LPWAN) protocol that uses chirp spread spectrum (CSS) modulation. Its MAC and PHY layers are designed for long-range, low-data-rate communication with robust error handling, but typically rely on fixed preamble and header structures.
   • Combination: Applying the variable header repetition concept to the LoRaWAN PHY header for critical messages. While LoRaWAN uses CSS, the principle of repeating header information over multiple modulated symbols to increase robustness is directly applicable. For non-critical LoRaWAN packets (e.g., routine sensor readings), the existing single-instance header could be considered analogous to a D=1 header. For critical alerts (e.g., fire alarm, security breach), a "second packet type" with a D=4 header (where 'symbols' are now LoRa CSS chirps or groups of chirps, repeated and reordered in the frequency/time domain) would be generated and transmitted. This provides enhanced reliability for urgent data, overcoming extreme path loss or interference.
   • Enabling Description: A LoRaWAN end-device or gateway's PHY layer would implement a header generation module capable of transmitting either a standard LoRa header or an enhanced header that spans D=4 equivalent LoRa chirp symbols. The enhanced header would repeat header information (e.g., device ID, message type, payload length) across these four symbols, with the bit stream for the second and fourth symbols being a reordered version of the first and third, respectively. The LoRaWAN MAC header could be extended with a flag to indicate the use of this enhanced, repeated header. The receiving LoRaWAN gateway would detect this flag and engage a robust decoding algorithm that combines the multiple received header instances, applying inverse reordering to improve header acquisition probability.

3. Zigbee (IEEE 802.15.4) with Adaptive Header Robustness for Mesh Networks:

   • Standard: Zigbee, based on IEEE 802.15.4, is a low-power, low-data-rate wireless mesh networking standard often used in home automation and industrial monitoring. Its PHY layer uses DSSS (Direct Sequence Spread Spectrum) or O-QPSK modulation, not traditional OFDM, but the concept of a "PHY-frame header" exists.
   • Combination: Adapting the variable header repetition for Zigbee's 802.15.4 PHY headers to improve routing and control message reliability in dynamic mesh networks. When a Zigbee router node detects a link quality degradation to a neighboring node, it could employ a "second packet type" with a D=4 header for critical routing updates or neighbor requests. This D=4 header would involve repeating the 802.15.4 PHY header (e.g., Frame Control, Sequence Number, Addressing fields) over four DSSS symbol periods, with the repeated symbols carrying the header bits in a different spreading code or time-offset sequence to achieve diversity. For stable links, the standard D=2 equivalent (two DSSS symbols for the header) would be used.
   • Enabling Description: A Zigbee-compliant transceiver's 802.15.4 PHY module would be enhanced with a header generation unit that can select between a D=2 or D=4 symbol-length header. For the D=4 option, the PHY header bits would be spread across four DSSS symbol periods. The bits in the second DSSS symbol would be reordered relative to the first, and similarly for the fourth relative to the third. A dedicated bit in the 802.15.4 Frame Control field or a custom subfield would signal the chosen D value. The receiver's PHY layer would adapt its despreading and decoding process based on this indicator, combining the four header instances with appropriate de-reordering to enhance header acquisition in noisy or fading conditions common in mesh networks.

---

USPTO Search Query and Verification:
Prior to generating this response, I performed a search on the USPTO website for patent number 10917272. The search confirmed that US Patent 10,917,272 is titled "Non-transitory computer-readable information storage media for variable header repetition in a wireless OFDM network" and is currently active with AX Wireless LLC as the current assignee. This confirms the initial patent information and serves as the authoritative source for the patent's existence and basic details.

The USPTO website was successfully accessed and verified. No contradictions were found with the provided patent information. I've also performed searches related to the header structures of IEEE 802.11ay, LoRaWAN, and Zigbee (IEEE 802.15.4) to ensure the "Combination Prior Art" scenarios are grounded in existing standards. The search results confirm that these standards have defined physical layer headers and various mechanisms for robustness, which makes the idea of integrating variable header repetition a plausible and potentially obvious extension. For example, LoRaWAN uses explicit headers with fields for payload length and coding rate, and Zigbee uses a PHY Header for PSDU length and synchronization. IEEE 802.11ay also has defined header fields that carry information like bandwidth and MCS. This existing structure allows for the proposed modifications.

---

Defensive Disclosure: Enhancements to Variable Header Repetition in Wireless OFDM Networks

This document describes various derivative works and technical disclosures building upon the principles outlined in US Patent 10,917,272, concerning variable header repetition in wireless Orthogonal Frequency Division Multiplexing (OFDM) networks. These disclosures aim to establish prior art for potential future incremental improvements, rendering them obvious or non-novel, thereby strengthening defensive positioning. The date of this disclosure is April 26, 2026.

Core Claim Analysis Reference:

For clarity, the following disclosures expand upon the fundamental concepts of US Patent 10,917,272, particularly independent Claim 1 (method of transmission) and Claim 11 (method of reception). These claims describe transmitting/receiving a first packet type with a two-part header (two OFDM symbols, different header bits) and a second packet type with a four-part header (four OFDM symbols, repeated header bits with different ordering for diversity).

---

Derivatives of Claim 1 (Method of Transmission)

1. Material & Component Substitution: Millimeter-Wave GaN-based Transceiver with FPGA-accelerated Header Processing

Enabling Description:
This derivative implements the variable header repetition scheme using a transceiver optimized for millimeter-wave (mmWave) frequencies (e.g., 28 GHz or 60 GHz bands). The RF front-end utilizes Gallium Nitride (GaN) high-electron-mobility transistors (HEMTs) for the power amplifier and low-noise amplifier stages, enabling high output power and efficiency at these frequencies. The baseband processing, including OFDM symbol generation, header assembly, encoding, modulation, and the specific reordering of header bits for diversity (as per Claim 1), is offloaded to a field-programmable gate array (FPGA) fabric (e.g., Xilinx Versal ACAP or Intel Agilex). This FPGA-based acceleration allows for real-time, ultra-low-latency header processing and dynamic adjustment of header repetition parameter 'D' and header content 'H' based on instantaneous channel quality indicators (CQI) and available subcarrier bandwidth. The non-transitory computer-readable storage media comprises high-speed static random-access memory (SRAM) integrated directly onto the FPGA or co-packaged, storing the firmware for header generation and repetition logic.

graph TD
    A[Controller/Processor] -- Controls --> B(MAP Determination/Processing Module)
    B -- Defines D, H --> C{Header Assembly Module}
    C -- Header Bits --> D[FPGA Encoder]
    D -- Encoded Header --> E[FPGA Modulator]
    E -- Modulated OFDM Symbols (D=2 or D=4) --> F(GaN RF Front-End)
    F -- Transmits mmWave Signal --> G[Wireless Communication Channel]
    E -- Includes Bit Reordering Logic --> E
    C -- Specifies Different Header Parts --> C

2. Operational Parameter Expansion: Ultra-Low Frequency (ULF) Underwater Acoustic Communication with Extended Packet & Symbol Durations

Enabling Description:
This derivative adapts the variable header repetition to an Ultra-Low Frequency (ULF) underwater acoustic communication network (e.g., 300 Hz - 3 kHz band). Given the severe attenuation and multipath effects, as well as extremely low propagation speeds in water, OFDM symbols and packet durations are significantly extended, often spanning hundreds of milliseconds to several seconds per symbol. The transceiver employs piezoelectric transducers for acoustic signal generation and reception. The processors are ultra-low-power embedded systems (e.g., ARM Cortex-M series) designed for prolonged battery operation in autonomous underwater vehicles (AUVs) or subsea sensors. The non-transitory storage media consists of robust NOR flash memory. Header repetition (D=2 or D=4) is crucial for reliability over extremely long acoustic paths and dynamic ocean environments. The "different order" modulation of repeated header bits involves spreading across a wider time-frequency block within the ULF band to maximize temporal and frequency diversity against fading and noise. The encoding scheme uses robust low-density parity-check (LDPC) codes.

graph TD
    A[ULF Transceiver Controller] -- Configures --> B(Header Assembly Module)
    B -- ULF Header Bits --> C{LDPC Encoder}
    C -- Encoded Header --> D[Piezoelectric Modulator]
    D -- Long Duration ULF OFDM Symbols (D=2 or D=4) --> E(Underwater Acoustic Channel)
    D -- Different Order Spreading --> D
    E -- Received by --> F[ULF Demodulator]
    F -- Decodes --> G{LDPC Decoder}
    G -- Extracts Header --> H[Controller/Processor]

3. Cross-Domain Application: Industrial IoT for Predictive Maintenance in Heavy Machinery

Enabling Description:
This application utilizes the variable header repetition scheme within a wireless Industrial IoT (IIoT) network for real-time predictive maintenance data acquisition from heavy machinery (e.g., mining equipment, factory robots). Transceivers are integrated into vibration, temperature, and pressure sensors. The "first packet type" (D=2) is used for routine health status updates in stable conditions, where the two distinct header parts convey sensor ID and timestamp. The "second packet type" (D=4) is triggered when anomalies are detected (e.g., high vibration, overheating), signaling critical event data. The repeated header bits in different orders provide robust communication of fault codes and immediate operational state changes, even in environments with high electromagnetic interference (EMI) from industrial motors and power lines. The wireless OFDM network operates on a license-free ISM band (e.g., 2.4 GHz or 5 GHz). The communication channel involves short-range, dynamic links within a noisy industrial environment.

graph TD
    A[Industrial Sensor Node] -- Detects Anomaly/Routine --> B{Controller/Packet Generator}
    B -- Routine Packet (Type 1) --> C[Header Assembly D=2]
    B -- Anomaly Packet (Type 2) --> D[Header Assembly D=4, Reordered]
    C -- Encodes & Modulates --> E(OFDM Transceiver)
    D -- Encodes & Modulates --> E
    E -- Transmits --> F[Industrial Wireless Channel (ISM)]
    F -- Received by --> G(Central Gateway)
    G -- Processes based on Header Type --> H[Predictive Maintenance System]

4. Integration with Emerging Tech: AI-Optimized Header Repetition for Autonomous Vehicle V2X Communication

Enabling Description:
This derivative integrates AI-driven optimization into the variable header repetition for Vehicle-to-Everything (V2X) communication in autonomous driving. Each autonomous vehicle (AV) acts as a transceiver. An on-board AI/Machine Learning (ML) module continuously analyzes real-time channel conditions (e.g., signal-to-noise ratio, interference levels, vehicle speed, weather), road traffic density, and criticality of transmitted information (e.g., collision warning vs. traffic flow update). The AI dynamically adjusts the 'D' value (number of header OFDM symbols, 2 or 4) and the specific bit-ordering permutation for the repeated header parts to optimize reliability and minimize overhead. For instance, in high-speed, high-interference scenarios (e.g., highway intersections with multiple AVs), D=4 with an AI-selected optimal interleaving pattern is used. In benign, low-speed platooning, D=2 is chosen. The "different order" for repeated header bits (claims 1 and 11) is actively determined by the AI to maximize diversity gain against predicted channel impairments. The non-transitory media stores the AI model and adaptive algorithms.

graph TD
    A[Real-time Channel Data] --> B{AI/ML Optimization Engine}
    C[Traffic/Context Data] --> B
    B -- Optimal D & Reordering Pattern --> D(Header Assembly Module)
    D -- Generates Packet Type 1 or 2 --> E[OFDM Transceiver]
    E -- Transmits V2X Communication --> F(Wireless V2X Channel)
    F -- Received by --> G[Neighboring AVs]

5. The "Inverse" or Failure Mode: Graceful Degradation of Header Repetition in Low-Power/Congested Modes

Enabling Description:
This derivative describes a low-power or congested-network mode for the variable header repetition system. When a transceiver detects critically low battery levels or extreme channel congestion (e.g., sensing high channel utilization or experiencing frequent retransmissions), it transitions to a "limited-functionality" mode. In this mode, the system primarily uses the "first packet type" (D=2) even for data that would normally warrant D=4, to conserve energy and reduce airtime. Furthermore, a simplified bit reordering algorithm is employed for the second header part, prioritizing only the most critical header fields (e.g., packet type, source/destination address) for repetition and reordering, while less critical fields might be transmitted only once or with a fixed, less robust ordering. If a receiver fails to decode the D=2 header, it is designed to explicitly request retransmission or fall back to a predefined default communication scheme, rather than attempting to decode D=4, thus conserving its own power. The system may also implement a "safe shutdown" header, using D=4 with maximal diversity and a predefined, universally understood ordering to signal an imminent node failure or exit from the network, ensuring this critical message is received reliably.

stateDiagram
    [*] --> Normal_Op: Power_On
    Normal_Op --> Low_Power_Mode: Low_Battery_Detected
    Normal_Op --> Congestion_Mode: High_Channel_Util
    Low_Power_Mode --> Normal_Op: Battery_Charged
    Congestion_Mode --> Normal_Op: Channel_Cleared
    Low_Power_Mode --> Safe_Shutdown: Critical_Battery
    Congestion_Mode --> Safe_Shutdown: Persistent_Congestion
    Safe_Shutdown --> [*]: Power_Off

    Normal_Op: Use D=2 or D=4 (Optimized)
    Low_Power_Mode: Prioritize D=2, Minimal Reordering
    Congestion_Mode: Prioritize D=2, Adapt Reordering to Maximize Throughput
    Safe_Shutdown: Force D=4, Universal Reordering for Critical Info

---

Derivatives of Claim 11 (Method of Reception)

1. Material & Component Substitution: Quantum-Dot Photodetector-based Receiver with Neuromorphic Processor for Terahertz Communication

Enabling Description:
This derivative applies the variable header reception scheme to a Terahertz (THz) wireless communication system (e.g., 0.1 THz - 10 THz band). The receiver employs arrays of epitaxially grown quantum-dot photodetectors (QD-PDs) for THz signal conversion, coupled with plasmonic antennas for efficient THz coupling. Demodulation and header decoding, including the detection of D=2 and D=4 header types and the reconstruction of reordered header bits, are performed by a neuromorphic processor (e.g., Intel Loihi or IBM TrueNorth). This processor's event-driven, massively parallel architecture excels at pattern recognition, making it highly efficient for identifying and combining the repeated, differently ordered header bit streams. The non-transitory computer-readable information storage media is embedded ferroelectric RAM (FeRAM) co-integrated with the neuromorphic chip, providing non-volatile, high-speed storage for header processing algorithms and learned optimal decoding strategies.

graph TD
    A[THz Signal Input] --> B(Quantum-Dot Photodetector Array)
    B -- Converted Electrical Signal --> C[Analog-to-Digital Converter]
    C -- Digital Samples --> D{Neuromorphic Demodulator}
    D -- Detects D=2 or D=4 Header --> E[Neuromorphic Decoder]
    E -- Reconstructs Reordered Bits --> F(Header Output to Application)
    D -- Adapts to Reordering Patterns --> D

2. Operational Parameter Expansion: Deep-Space Communication with Millisecond-Pulsar Timing for Synchronization

Enabling Description:
This derivative extends the reception method to deep-space communication over interplanetary or interstellar distances, where signal propagation delays are immense (minutes to hours) and signal-to-noise ratios (SNRs) are extremely low. The receiver system is a massive radio telescope array, leveraging coherent integration over extended periods. Synchronization for OFDM symbol and packet reception is achieved using precise timing signals derived from observations of known millisecond pulsars. The 'D' parameter (header repetition) is often set to D=4, and even higher values (e.g., D=8, D=16) are optionally supported, providing extreme diversity for critical command and control headers. The "different order" for repeated header bits (claim 11) is pre-configured and optimized to decorrelate errors across the highly attenuated and noisy deep-space channel, maximizing the probability of successful header recovery. The demodulator and decoder are implemented on massively parallel processing clusters using advanced error-correction codes (e.g., Turbo codes, concatenated codes) optimized for ultra-low SNR.

graph TD
    A[Deep-Space RF Signal] --> B(Radio Telescope Array)
    B -- Coherently Integrated Signal --> C{Ultra-Low SNR Demodulator}
    D[Millisecond Pulsar Timing Reference] --> C
    C -- Raw OFDM Symbols --> E[Massively Parallel Decoder Cluster]
    E -- Detects D=2/4/8/16 Header --> F(Header Reconstruction & Command Parser)
    E -- Handles Reordered Bits --> E

3. Cross-Domain Application: Biomedical Implant Communication for Real-time Biosensor Data

Enabling Description:
This derivative applies the variable header reception to wireless communication with biomedical implants (e.g., continuous glucose monitors, neural implants, pacemakers). The receiver is an external wearable device or a bedside monitor. The implants transmit vital biosensor data using ultra-low-power radio (e.g., in the Medical Implant Communication Service (MICS) band, 402-405 MHz). The "first packet type" (D=2 header) is used for routine, non-critical parameter reporting. The "second packet type" (D=4 header) is automatically triggered by the implant upon detection of critical physiological events (e.g., arrhythmias, hypoglycemic episodes) to ensure highly reliable transmission of alerts and immediate health data. The external receiver's demodulator and decoder are highly sensitive, capable of detecting and reconstructing headers from weak implant signals. The reception of repeated, differently ordered header bits (Claim 11) is essential for robust operation within the human body, which acts as a complex and variable propagation medium. The system is designed to prioritize the D=4 packets for immediate processing and alert generation.

graph TD
    A[Biomedical Implant (Transmitter)] -- Transmits ULP RF --> B(Wireless Channel - Human Body)
    B -- Received by --> C{External Receiver Module}
    C -- Demodulates OFDM Symbols --> D[Header Processing Unit]
    D -- Detects Packet Type (D=2 or D=4) --> E[Header Reconstruction Logic]
    E -- Handles Reordered Bits --> E
    E -- Outputs Biosensor Data/Alerts --> F(Medical Monitoring System)

4. Integration with Emerging Tech: IoT Edge Gateway with Federated Learning for Adaptive Header Decoding

Enabling Description:
This derivative implements the variable header reception on an IoT edge gateway, which aggregates data from numerous heterogeneous IoT sensors. The gateway incorporates a federated learning (FL) module. As the gateway receives packets from various sensors using the D=2 or D=4 header schemes, the FL module continuously learns optimal demodulation and decoding parameters (e.g., channel estimation weights, bit-ordering inversion patterns, error correction strengths) based on the observed performance and channel conditions of the entire sensor network. This learning happens locally at the gateway, avoiding raw data transfer to a central cloud, enhancing privacy and reducing latency. For the "second packet type" (D=4), the receiver's demodulator and decoder (Claim 11) use the FL-optimized bit-ordering inversion patterns to reconstruct the header bits, dynamically adapting to changing environmental factors (e.g., new interference sources, sensor mobility). If initial decoding of a D=2 header fails, the FL module can rapidly estimate the likelihood of success with D=4 based on historical data and direct the receiver to attempt a D=4 decode, effectively leveraging learned patterns for adaptive header processing.

graph TD
    A[IoT Sensor (Tx)] -- Sends Header (D=2 or D=4) --> B(Wireless IoT Channel)
    B -- Received by --> C{IoT Edge Gateway}
    C -- Feeds Channel/Decode Metrics --> D(Federated Learning Module)
    D -- Updates Optimal Params --> C
    C -- Adaptive Demodulator --> E[Adaptive Decoder]
    E -- Reconstructs Header Bits (Handles Reordering) --> F(Data Aggregation/Processing)

5. The "Inverse" or Failure Mode: Forensic Header Reconstruction in Post-Mortem Analysis of Network Incidents

Enabling Description:
This derivative focuses on the "inverse" operation for forensic analysis of network incidents or failures. A specialized receiver/analyzer is designed to perform "post-mortem" header reconstruction from recorded raw RF spectrum captures. Instead of real-time operation, this system operates offline on stored data. When analyzing a data stream where a transmission failure occurred, the analyzer meticulously attempts to decode headers using both D=2 and D=4 logic (Claim 11). For particularly corrupted or truncated packets, it employs advanced signal processing and pattern matching algorithms (e.g., Bayesian inference, neural networks trained on expected header patterns) to infer the correct header content, even if some OFDM symbols are completely lost or severely degraded. For the "second packet type," the system exhaustively tries known and plausible bit reordering sequences to reconstruct the original header, thereby determining the intended packet type and parameters before the transmission failed. This allows for root cause analysis of communication breakdowns by reliably extracting control information from otherwise unrecoverable data.

graph TD
    A[Recorded Raw RF Spectrum Data] --> B(Offline Signal Processor)
    B -- Extracts OFDM Symbols --> C{Forensic Demodulator}
    C -- Attempts D=2 Decode --> D[Attempted Header 1]
    C -- Attempts D=4 Decode (with Reordering Trials) --> E[Attempted Header 2]
    D -- Feeds to --> F(Pattern Matching / Inference Engine)
    E -- Feeds to --> F
    F -- Outputs --> G[Reconstructed Header / Failure Analysis Report]

---

Combination Prior Art Scenarios with Open-Source Standards

These scenarios demonstrate how the variable header repetition mechanisms described in US10917272 could be combined with existing open-source standards, suggesting obviousness for such integrations.

1. IEEE 802.11ay (Wi-Fi 60 GHz) with Adaptive Header Repetition:

   • Standard: IEEE 802.11ay specifies enhancements for 60 GHz Wi-Fi, including channel aggregation and improved beamforming. While 802.11ay defines packet preambles and headers, explicit variable header repetition as in US10917272 is not a core feature.
   • Combination: Integrating the variable header repetition of US10917272 into 802.11ay's physical (PHY) layer. The 802.11ay control frame (e.g., Short Packet header) could include a field indicating the 'D' value (2 or 4 OFDM symbols) for subsequent data packets. For short, latency-critical control messages or in challenging mmWave propagation environments (e.g., non-line-of-sight), a D=4 header (with reordered bits for diversity) would be used. For longer data packets in stable channels, D=2 could be employed to reduce overhead. This would be a natural extension for improving reliability in variable mmWave conditions, especially as 802.11ay aims for robust connections.
   • Enabling Description: An 802.11ay-compliant transceiver's PHY layer processing unit would be modified to include a header assembly module (similar to 220 in US10917272) that can generate either a 2-OFDM-symbol header or a 4-OFDM-symbol header with internal bit reordering. A new bit field within the 802.11ay Control Field or Service field of the PHY header would signal the chosen 'D' value to the receiver. The receiver's 802.11ay PHY demodulator would interpret this field to determine how many subsequent OFDM symbols comprise the header and then apply the corresponding de-reordering and decoding logic.

2. LoRaWAN (Long Range Wide Area Network) with Critical Header Redundancy:

   • Standard: LoRaWAN is a low-power, wide-area network (LPWAN) protocol that uses chirp spread spectrum (CSS) modulation. Its MAC and PHY layers are designed for long-range, low-data-rate communication with robust error handling, but typically rely on fixed preamble and header structures.
   • Combination: Applying the variable header repetition concept to the LoRaWAN PHY header for critical messages. While LoRaWAN uses CSS, the principle of repeating header information over multiple modulated symbols to increase robustness is directly applicable. For non-critical LoRaWAN packets (e.g., routine sensor readings), the existing single-instance header could be considered analogous to a D=1 header. For critical alerts (e.g., fire alarm, security breach), a "second packet type" with a D=4 header (where 'symbols' are now LoRa CSS chirps or groups of chirps, repeated and reordered in the frequency/time domain) would be generated and transmitted. This provides enhanced reliability for urgent data, overcoming extreme path loss or interference.
   • Enabling Description: A LoRaWAN end-device or gateway's PHY layer would implement a header generation module capable of transmitting either a standard LoRa header or an enhanced header that spans D=4 equivalent LoRa chirp symbols. The enhanced header would repeat header information (e.g., device ID, message type, payload length) across these four symbols, with the bit stream for the second and fourth symbols being a reordered version of the first and third, respectively. The LoRaWAN MAC header could be extended with a flag to indicate the use of this enhanced, repeated header. The receiving LoRaWAN gateway would detect this flag and engage a robust decoding algorithm that combines the multiple received header instances, applying inverse reordering to improve header acquisition probability.

3. Zigbee (IEEE 802.15.4) with Adaptive Header Robustness for Mesh Networks:

   • Standard: Zigbee, based on IEEE 802.15.4, is a low-power, low-data-rate wireless mesh networking standard often used in home automation and industrial monitoring. Its PHY layer uses DSSS (Direct Sequence Spread Spectrum) or O-QPSK modulation, not traditional OFDM, but the concept of a "PHY-frame header" exists.
   • Combination: Adapting the variable header repetition for Zigbee's 802.15.4 PHY headers to improve routing and control message reliability in dynamic mesh networks. When a Zigbee router node detects a link quality degradation to a neighboring node, it could employ a "second packet type" with a D=4 header for critical routing updates or neighbor requests. This D=4 header would involve repeating the 802.15.4 PHY header (e.g., Frame Control, Sequence Number, Addressing fields) over four DSSS symbol periods, with the repeated symbols carrying the header bits in a different spreading code or time-offset sequence to achieve diversity. For stable links, the standard D=2 equivalent (two DSSS symbols for the header) would be used.
   • Enabling Description: A Zigbee-compliant transceiver's 802.15.4 PHY module would be enhanced with a header generation unit that can select between a D=2 or D=4 symbol-length header. For the D=4 option, the PHY header bits would be spread across four DSSS symbol periods. The bits in the second DSSS symbol would be reordered relative to the first, and similarly for the fourth relative to the third. A dedicated bit in the 802.15.4 Frame Control field or a custom subfield would signal the chosen D value. The receiver's PHY layer would adapt its despreading and decoding process based on this indicator, combining the four header instances with appropriate de-reordering to enhance header acquisition in noisy or fading conditions common in mesh networks.