- Filed
- Sep 25, 2025
- Last modified
- Jun 22, 2026
- Petitioner
- Accelight Technologies, Inc. et al.
- Inventor
- Kai-Sheng LIN et al
Patent 10788690
PTAB challenges
AIA trial proceedings at the USPTO Patent Trial and Appeal Board — IPR, PGR, and CBM. Petitioners, judge panels, claim-level invalidation outcomes from Final Written Decisions, and Federal Circuit appeals. The single most important defensive datapoint after litigation history.
Active provider: Google · gemini-2.5-flash
Proceedings on file (1)
All PTAB activity →AIA trial proceedings (IPR / PGR / CBM) filed at the USPTO Patent Trial and Appeal Board against this patent. Sourced from the USPTO Open Data Portal and refreshed every six hours; each proceeding number deep-links to the PTAB E2E docket.
PTAB challenges
AIA trial proceedings at the USPTO Patent Trial and Appeal Board — IPR, PGR, and CBM. Petitioners, judge panels, claim-level invalidation outcomes from Final Written Decisions, and Federal Circuit appeals. The single most important defensive datapoint after litigation history.
Proceedings overview
There is currently one active AIA trial proceeding on US patent 10788690. The proceeding is currently in the "Trial Instituted" status. This means that at least some claims of the patent are currently under review for patentability, and no final decision has been reached yet. Therefore, the defensive posture for a defendant facing assertion of this patent is one of uncertainty regarding the ultimate validity of the challenged claims.
IPR2025-01570 — Accelight Technologies, Inc. et al. v. Kai-Sheng LIN et al
- Type: Inter Partes Review
- Filed: 2025-09-25
- Status: Trial Instituted — The PTAB has determined that there is a reasonable likelihood that at least one claim challenged in the petition is unpatentable, and a trial has been initiated to further examine the challenged claims.
- Judge panel:
- Petition grounds: Information regarding specific claims challenged, prior art, and statutory bases (§ 102 / § 103 / § 112) is not publicly available at this stage through the provided information.
- Institution decision: Instituted. The exact date and detailed reasoning for institution are not available in the provided data, but the "Trial Instituted" status indicates that the PTAB found sufficient grounds to proceed with a review of the challenged claims.
- Final Written Decision (if issued): Not yet issued, as the proceeding is in the "Trial Instituted" status.
- Settlement / termination: No information on settlement or termination is available at this time.
- Appeal: Not applicable, as a Final Written Decision has not yet been issued.
- Defensive value: This active IPR proceeding creates a degree of uncertainty regarding the patent's claims. If the IPR ultimately results in the invalidation of key claims, it would significantly weaken any infringement theories built upon them. Conversely, if the claims are sustained, the patent's validity would be strengthened.
Strategic summary
Currently, the patent US10788690 has one active IPR proceeding (IPR2025-01570) which has reached the "Trial Instituted" stage. This means that the patent owner, Applied Optoelectronics Inc., is actively defending the patentability of at least some of its claims. Without the specific details of the petition grounds, it is impossible to precisely state which claims are currently challenged or what prior art is being asserted against them. However, the institution of trial indicates that the PTAB found a reasonable likelihood of unpatentability for at least some challenged claims.
Regarding the estoppel landscape, if Accelight Technologies, Inc. et al. are the petitioner in IPR2025-01570 and a Final Written Decision is eventually issued, they (and their privies) would be estopped under § 315(e)(2) from asserting in future proceedings any invalidity ground they raised or reasonably could have raised in this IPR against the claims that survive. For other potential defendants, the specific prior art and grounds raised in IPR2025-01570 are currently not publicly detailed, but will become relevant once the record is public. There is no information to indicate a pattern of multiple IPRs by the same petitioner on this patent or aggressive PTAB appeals by the patent owner at this time. Unified Patents is listed as having filed other PTAB cases related to this patent family (IPR2025-00437 and IPR2025-01570, based on the Google Patents legal status information), suggesting a defensive aggregator's involvement.
Recommended next steps
Given that IPR2025-01570 is in the "Trial Instituted" phase, a defendant facing assertion of this patent should closely monitor the progress of this proceeding. While specific dates are not provided in the prompt, PTAB trials generally adhere to a statutory 1-year deadline from institution to Final Written Decision. Accessing the publicly available documents for IPR2025-01570 on the USPTO PTAB E2E system, if possible, would provide crucial details on the claims challenged, the prior art asserted, and the PTAB's reasoning for institution. This information would be invaluable in assessing the strength of the patent and formulating a defense strategy. The Google Patents legal status section indicates that the PTAB case IPR2025-01570 was filed on 2025-09-25 and is "Pending - Instituted".
Generated 5/24/2026, 6:48:33 AM