Invalidity dossier

US 10751218

Added 9/1/2026, 12:00:10 PM

At a glanceNo PTAB challengesNo litigation on fileSporting Goods (S)

Active provider: DeepSeek · deepseek-v4-flash

Auto-generating section 1 of 7: Litigation summary

Each section takes ~30-60s with web-search grounding. Keep this tab open — sections will fill in below as they complete.

Patent summary

Title, assignee, inventors, filing/issue dates, abstract, and a plain-language overview of the claims.

✓ Generated

I'll search the USPTO and CAFC sources for this specific patent number.

The patent details are confirmed by multiple sources. Let me run additional targeted searches to verify USPTO records and check specifically for any CAFC/litigation involving this patent number.

Let me do a final check specifically for any administrative or appellate proceedings naming this patent.

Summary: US Patent 10,751,218 B2 (patent number: 10751218)

Bibliographic data

Field Value
Title Air cooled goggle
Patent number US10751218B2 (application no. 13/750,093)
Inventors Marc Blanchard (Solana Beach, CA) and Ludovic Boinnard (San Diego, CA)
Assignee 100% Speedlab, LLC (San Diego, CA)
Filing date January 25, 2013
Issue date (grant) August 25, 2020
Prior publication US20140208489A1 (published July 31, 2014)
Status Active; adjusted expiration February 2, 2035; maintenance fee paid (4th year, small entity, Feb. 2024)
Classification A61F9/028 (Goggles – Ventilation means)
Examiner / agent Primary Examiner Anna K. Kinsaul / F. Griffin Hall; agent Kolitch Romano LLP (per patents-review.com)

Source: Google Patents (patents.google.com/patent/US10751218/en), Justia (patents.justia.com/patent/10751218), patents-review.com, and freepatentsonline.com — all consistent with one another.

Abstract (verbatim)

A sports goggle comprising a lens attached to a flexible frame and configured to be positioned over the user's eyes, the flexible frame comprising an outer surface that is oriented away from the user's face and an inner surface that generally conforms to the shape of the user's face, the inner surface completely or partially covered with a flexible liner, and one or more first apertures in the outer surface connected to one or more apertures in the inner surface by one or more channels to allow airflow through the frame to the flexible liner. The flexible liner may be made of foam, open-cell foam, another porous material, or other material that allows air to pass through it. The goggle may include a screen and/or a filter positioned near the first aperture, between the first aperture and the second aperture, or near the second aperture.

Plain-language overview of the independent claims

The patent has 17 claims; there are four independent claims (1, 7, 16, and 17):

  • Claim 1 (sports goggle — core cooling concept). A goggle with a flexible frame (outer surface facing away from the face, inner surface shaped to the face), a lens held by the frame around its periphery, and a flexible liner on the inner surface that contacts the face. The frame has a first aperture on its outer surface and a second aperture on its inner surface, with the liner placed directly over (covering) the second aperture. A channel through the frame connects the two apertures so incoming air flows through the frame and is dispersed directly into the liner to cool the skin where the liner contacts it. The liner seals against the face and contacts at least the forehead, cheeks, and temples.

  • Claim 7 (eye protection device — central raised frame portion). A frame with outer/inner surfaces that receives a lens around its periphery. The top of the frame has a single central raised portion between left and right top portions, joined to them by left/right angled joints, and rising vertically above the otherwise continuous profile of those portions. Like claim 1, it has a liner over a second aperture and a channel directing airflow into the liner. The angled joints themselves also contain one or more outer-surface apertures connected by channels to inner-surface apertures.

  • Claim 16 (sports goggle — multiple vents on top and bottom). A flexible frame whose inner and outer surfaces are spaced apart by a "spaced apart region," with a lens, multiple first apertures, multiple second apertures (covered by the liner), and multiple channels each connecting a respective first aperture to a respective second aperture through the spaced-apart region. At least one aperture/channel set is on the top of the frame and at least one is on the bottom.

  • Claim 17 (sports goggle — frame members in the spaced-apart region). Similar construction with inner/outer surfaces spaced apart, but adds frame members extending between the surfaces within the spaced-apart region, plus a lens, liner, a first aperture, a second aperture (covered by the liner), and a channel formed through the frame and through the space between the surfaces, connecting the apertures to deliver airflow into the liner.

In short, the invention routes outside air through dedicated channels in the goggle frame directly into the porous face-foam liner — rather than into the lens-to-eye space — to actively cool the skin areas the goggle seals against (forehead, cheeks, temples) without letting dust/irritants reach the eyes.

CAFC 2026 docket search result

No CAFC (or other appellate) proceeding involving patent 10751218 was found. Searches of CAFC 2026 docket coverage (WilmerHale Federal Circuit Patent Watch, A&O Shearman IP Blog, and general litigation/keyword searches for "10751218," "10,751,218," and "US10751218B2") returned no appeal, IPR, reexamination, or infringement action naming this patent. The patent appears in the cited-art lists of later 100% Speedlab design patents (e.g., D917606, D948599) but in no litigated or post-grant proceeding located.

Uncertainty notes

  • I could not directly query the USPTO Patent Center/assignment database in these searches; bibliographic data above is corroborated by Google Patents, Justia, patents-review.com, and freepatentsonline.com, all of which agree.
  • The absence of CAFC docket entries reflects only what the searches returned; absence of results is not definitive proof that no proceeding exists, but no such proceeding surfaced in any search.

Generated 9/1/2026, 12:01:06 PM

Cases on file (0)

Specific litigation cases in our database that name US patent 10751218. The free-form analysis below may also discuss cases beyond this list.

No cases on file mention this patent. Upload a CSV or add a case manually in Admin → Manage litigation cases.

Litigation summary

Past and pending lawsuits — plaintiffs, defendants, jurisdictions, outcomes, and notable rulings.

Not generated yet. Click Generate to call the active LLM provider with the configured prompt.

Proceedings on file (0)

All PTAB activity →

AIA trial proceedings (IPR / PGR / CBM) filed at the USPTO Patent Trial and Appeal Board against this patent. Sourced from the USPTO Open Data Portal and refreshed every six hours; each proceeding number deep-links to the PTAB E2E docket.

No PTAB proceedings on file. This patent has not been challenged via IPR, PGR, or CBM. The absence is itself a signal — well-asserted patents eventually attract IPRs. The LLM analysis below may surface filings the ODP feed hasn’t indexed yet.

PTAB challenges

AIA trial proceedings at the USPTO Patent Trial and Appeal Board — IPR, PGR, and CBM. Petitioners, judge panels, claim-level invalidation outcomes from Final Written Decisions, and Federal Circuit appeals. The single most important defensive datapoint after litigation history.

Not generated yet. Click Generate to call the active LLM provider with the configured prompt.

Assignment history

Inventors, original assignee, and the chain of ownership recorded with the USPTO — including the correspondent attorney who recorded each assignment, since shell-LLC chains often share one repeat-player attorney even when the entity names look unrelated. Surfaces NPE / patent-troll patterns: shell-entity transfers, known asserters in the chain, repeat correspondent fingerprints, pre-litigation assignments, and bankruptcy fire-sales.

Not generated yet. Click Generate to call the active LLM provider with the configured prompt.

Prior art

Earlier patents, publications, and products that may anticipate or render the claims unpatentable.

Not generated yet. Click Generate to call the active LLM provider with the configured prompt.

Obviousness

Combinations of prior art that suggest the claimed invention would have been obvious under 35 U.S.C. § 103.

Not generated yet. Click Generate to call the active LLM provider with the configured prompt.

Extensions

Patent term adjustments, term extensions, continuations, divisionals, family members, and expiration dates.

Not generated yet. Click Generate to call the active LLM provider with the configured prompt.

Derivative works

Defensive disclosure: derivative variations of each claim designed to render future incremental improvements obvious or non-novel.

Not generated yet. Click Generate to call the active LLM provider with the configured prompt.

Keep exploring

Other patents in Sporting Goods (S)

See all Sporting Goods (S) patents →