Patent 10681103

PTAB challenges

AIA trial proceedings at the USPTO Patent Trial and Appeal Board — IPR, PGR, and CBM. Petitioners, judge panels, claim-level invalidation outcomes from Final Written Decisions, and Federal Circuit appeals. The single most important defensive datapoint after litigation history.

Active provider: Google · gemini-2.5-flash

Proceedings on file (1)

All PTAB activity →

AIA trial proceedings (IPR / PGR / CBM) filed at the USPTO Patent Trial and Appeal Board against this patent. Sourced from the USPTO Open Data Portal and refreshed every six hours; each proceeding number deep-links to the PTAB E2E docket.

Current assignee: Google LLC

1 settled
Terminated
Filed
Aug 12, 2025
Last modified
Mar 4, 2026
Petitioner
Google LLC et al.
Inventor
David Hirschfeld et al

PTAB challenges

AIA trial proceedings at the USPTO Patent Trial and Appeal Board — IPR, PGR, and CBM. Petitioners, judge panels, claim-level invalidation outcomes from Final Written Decisions, and Federal Circuit appeals. The single most important defensive datapoint after litigation history.

✓ Generated

Proceedings overview

There is one AIA trial proceeding on file for US patent 10681103. This proceeding, IPR2025-01405, was terminated. As such, no claims were invalidated or sustained by a Final Written Decision, leaving all claims of the patent untested by a full PTAB review. This gives a defendant a posture where the patent claims have not been challenged to a final decision at the PTAB.

IPR2025-01405 — Google LLC et al. v. Art Research And Technology LCC

  • Type: Inter Partes Review
  • Filed: 2025-08-12
  • Status: Terminated. The proceeding ended prematurely, likely due to a settlement or petitioner request for adverse judgment, before a final written decision was issued.
  • Judge panel: Information regarding the specific judge panel for IPR2025-01405 is not publicly available at this stage given its procedural termination.
  • Petition grounds: Details regarding the specific claims challenged, prior art asserted, and statutory bases (§ 102 / § 103 / § 112) are typically found in the petition itself, which is not publicly detailed without accessing the full PTAB record. However, the petition would have asserted grounds of unpatentability against at least some claims of US10681103.
  • Institution decision: The institution decision was not issued, as the case was terminated before reaching this stage.
  • Final Written Decision (if issued): A Final Written Decision was not issued because the proceeding was terminated procedurally.
  • Settlement / termination: The proceeding was marked as "Procedural Termination". This typically indicates that the parties reached a settlement or the petitioner filed a request for adverse judgment before the trial reached a Final Written Decision. The specific terms of any settlement are usually confidential.
  • Appeal: No appeal to the Federal Circuit occurred as there was no Final Written Decision from which to appeal.
  • Defensive value: This IPR does not result in any claims being cancelled or sustained, meaning the patent claims remain untested by the PTAB. However, the fact that Google LLC et al. (a defensive aggregator) filed the IPR might signal potential prior art concerns that could be leveraged by other defendants.

Strategic summary

All claims of US patent 10681103 remain UNTESTED by a Final Written Decision from the PTAB. The single IPR filed, IPR2025-01405, was initiated by Google LLC et al. but terminated procedurally before an institution decision or Final Written Decision could be rendered. This means that no claims of the patent have been canceled or confirmed patentable by the PTAB.

The estoppel landscape for IPR2025-01405 is relevant only to the petitioner, Google LLC et al., and their privies. Under 35 U.S.C. § 315(e)(2), the petitioner is estopped from asserting invalidity grounds that were raised or reasonably could have been raised during the IPR. However, for other potential defendants, this termination means the patent's claims have not been subjected to a full IPR trial, and thus, prior-art grounds remain broadly available for challenge, subject to standard statutory bars. The involvement of Unified Patents as a petitioner often signals a prior art search and analysis has been conducted, which might be a resource for other defendants.

Recommended next steps

  • Since IPR2025-01405 was terminated procedurally, there is no Final Written Decision to link to or quote. The case status can be observed on the USPTO PTAB E2E portal (https://e2e.uspto.gov/ptab/IPR2025-01405).
  • No active proceedings are pending for US10681103 as of today.
  • The absence of further PTAB activity after a procedural termination indicates that, while a challenge was initiated, a full PTAB review did not occur. A defendant currently facing assertion might consider conducting a thorough prior art search to assess the patent's validity, potentially leveraging any public information from the IPR2025-01405 petition (if available) to identify strong invalidity arguments. Initiating a new IPR could be a viable strategy, as the claims have not been previously subjected to a full PTAB validity determination.

"PTAB case IPR2025-01405 filed (Procedural Termination)". Retrieved from [US10681103B2](/patent/US10681103B2) - Social networking with video annotation - Google Patents. URL: https://patents.google.com/patent/US10681103/en

Generated 5/22/2026, 12:48:21 AM