Patent 10651866

Litigation summary

Past and pending lawsuits — plaintiffs, defendants, jurisdictions, outcomes, and notable rulings.

Active provider: Google · gemini-2.5-pro

No PTAB proceedings on file. This patent has not been challenged through Inter Partes Review, Post-Grant Review, or Covered Business Method review at the USPTO. The absence is itself a signal — well-asserted patents eventually attract IPRs.

Cases on file (2)

Group view →

Specific litigation cases in our database that name US patent 10651866. The free-form analysis below may also discuss cases beyond this list.

Litigation summary

Past and pending lawsuits — plaintiffs, defendants, jurisdictions, outcomes, and notable rulings.

✓ Generated

Patent Litigation Status

As of May 1, 2026, U.S. Patent No. 10,651,866, assigned to Solos Technology Ltd., is involved in one known litigation. The patent is one of several asserted in a lawsuit against major technology and eyewear companies.

Details of the case are as follows:

Allegations and Status:

The lawsuit, filed by Solos Technology Limited, alleges that the defendants' "Meta Ray-Ban" and "Oakley Meta" smart glasses infringe upon a portfolio of Solos' patents, including U.S. Patent No. 10,651,866. The asserted patents cover core technologies related to smart eyewear, such as beamforming and audio processing, which are central to the '866 patent.

Solos is seeking significant damages, reportedly in the "multiple billions of dollars," as well as a permanent injunction to halt the sale of the accused products. The complaint alleges that Meta and its partners had prior knowledge of Solos' technology and patents.

As of March 2026, the defendants have moved to dismiss the lawsuit. Their arguments include that the complaint fails to plausibly allege infringement and that Solos has not included a necessary party, BlueRadios Inc., which reportedly claims co-ownership of the asserted patents.

Additionally, a motion was filed by the plaintiff, Solos, to disqualify the law firm Morgan Lewis & Bockius LLP from representing the EssilorLuxottica defendants, citing a conflict of interest due to the firm's prior work with Kopin Corporation, from which Solos originated.

The case is currently in its early stages, and the court has yet to rule on these preliminary motions.

Generated 5/1/2026, 11:03:04 PM