Invalidity dossier

US 10648800

System and process for roof measurement using imagery

Current assignee: Pictometry International Corp

Added 10/9/2026, 12:01:28 AM

At a glanceNo PTAB challengesNo litigation on file

Active provider: DeepSeek · deepseek-flash

Patent summary

Title, assignee, inventors, filing/issue dates, abstract, and a plain-language overview of the claims.

✓ Generated

Patent Overview — US10648800B2

Title: System and process for roof measurement using imagery

Assignee/Original Assignee: Pictometry International Corp. Inventors: Dale R. Thornberry, Chris T. Thornberry, Mark F. Garringer. Assignments recorded from Thornberry Consulting, LLC and the individual inventors.

Key dates (as listed): Priority date 2009-05-22; filing date 2019-02-01 (application US16/265,338); publication of US20200003554A1 on 2020-01-02; granted/publication date 2020-05-12; anticipated expiration 2029-05-22. Status listed as Active.

Purpose: The invention is in the field of measuring roofing dimensions and other attributes, particularly using aerial imagery. Roof measuring (dimensions, lengths, areas) has long been used for estimating and bidding roofing jobs, with estimation services and reporting software that trace roof line outlines on aerial imagery, automatically derive dimensions and areas from those tracings, and incorporate vertical elevations (via pitch or otherwise) into mathematical models. The stated improvement provides non-obvious features enhancing convenience, flexibility, and/or accuracy.

Plain-language scope (from the excerpt): Disclosed features include creating first and second layers in computer memory and substantially overlapping a line segment from the first layer with a line segment from the second layer, where a first non-dimensional attribute differs from a second non-dimensional attribute; an interactive computer file containing length numeric values and at least one user length field letting a client override a length value, with an area operator that may automatically recalculate area based on the override; providing a computer input field for a user to input first location data generally corresponding to a building's location; displaying imagery with a movable visual marker initially corresponding to that location data, which may be moved onto the building to more precisely identify the roof structure's location; and providing a computer input. Flow charts (FIGS. 1–3), screen shots (FIGS. 4A–4D), and reporting examples (FIGS. 5A–5I, 6–7A) are referenced.

Source: https://patents.google.com/patent/[US10648800](/patent/US10648800)/en

What the excerpt does not establish: It does not provide full claim text, the complete specification, or the full description of FIG. 7A and later figures; the overridden-value, marker, and layer features are summarized only partially. No legal conclusions about validity, enforceability, or claim scope are supported.

Generated 10/10/2026, 12:00:54 AM

Cases on file (0)

Specific litigation cases in our database that name US patent 10648800. The free-form analysis below may also discuss cases beyond this list.

No cases on file mention this patent. Upload a CSV or add a case manually in Admin → Manage litigation cases.

Litigation summary

Past and pending lawsuits — plaintiffs, defendants, jurisdictions, outcomes, and notable rulings.

Log in to generate
Not generated yet. Log in to request this analysis.

Proceedings on file (0)

All PTAB activity →

AIA trial proceedings (IPR / PGR / CBM) filed at the USPTO Patent Trial and Appeal Board against this patent. Sourced from the USPTO Open Data Portal and refreshed every six hours; each proceeding number deep-links to the PTAB E2E docket.

No PTAB proceedings on file. This patent has not been challenged via IPR, PGR, or CBM. The absence is itself a signal — well-asserted patents eventually attract IPRs. The LLM analysis below may surface filings the ODP feed hasn’t indexed yet.

PTAB challenges

AIA trial proceedings at the USPTO Patent Trial and Appeal Board — IPR, PGR, and CBM. Petitioners, judge panels, claim-level invalidation outcomes from Final Written Decisions, and Federal Circuit appeals. The single most important defensive datapoint after litigation history.

Log in to generate
Not generated yet. Log in to request this analysis.

Assignment history

Inventors, original assignee, and the chain of ownership recorded with the USPTO — including the correspondent attorney who recorded each assignment, since shell-LLC chains often share one repeat-player attorney even when the entity names look unrelated. Surfaces NPE / patent-troll patterns: shell-entity transfers, known asserters in the chain, repeat correspondent fingerprints, pre-litigation assignments, and bankruptcy fire-sales.

Log in to generate
Not generated yet. Log in to request this analysis.

Prior art

Earlier patents, publications, and products that may anticipate or render the claims unpatentable.

Log in to generate
Not generated yet. Log in to request this analysis.

Obviousness

Combinations of prior art that suggest the claimed invention would have been obvious under 35 U.S.C. § 103.

Log in to generate
Not generated yet. Log in to request this analysis.

Extensions

Patent term adjustments, term extensions, continuations, divisionals, family members, and expiration dates.

Log in to generate
Not generated yet. Log in to request this analysis.

Derivative works

Defensive disclosure: derivative variations of each claim designed to render future incremental improvements obvious or non-novel.

Log in to generate
Not generated yet. Log in to request this analysis.