Invalidity dossier
US 10614826
System and method for voice-to-voice conversion
Current assignee: Modulate Inc
Added 9/23/2026, 10:13:19 PM
Active provider: DeepSeek · deepseek-flash
Patent summary
Title, assignee, inventors, filing/issue dates, abstract, and a plain-language overview of the claims.
Patent Overview — US 10614826 B2
Source: https://patents.google.com/patent/US10614826/en
Title: System and method for voice-to-voice conversion.
Assignee/Applicant: Modulate Inc (original assignee Modulate Inc; assignment to Modulate, LLC recorded 2018-06-22; name change to MODULATE, INC. recorded 2020-01-21, per the listed reassignment entries).
Key dates: Priority date 2017-05-24; filing date 2018-05-24; publication of US20180342256A1 on 2018-11-29; granted 2020-04-07; adjusted expiration listed as 2038-10-14; legal status listed as Active. Inventors: William Carter Huffman and Michael Pappas.
Purpose and plain-language scope: The patent generally relates to voice conversion and, more particularly, to generating synthetic voice profiles. A method of building a speech conversion system receives source speech data representing a first speech segment of a source voice, and target timbre data relating to a target voice, the target timbre data being within a timbre space. A generative machine learning system produces first candidate speech data representing a first candidate speech segment in a first candidate voice, as a function of the source speech data and the target timbre data.
A discriminative machine learning system compares the first candidate speech data to the target timbre data with reference to timbre data of a plurality of different voices, determines at least one inconsistency, and produces an inconsistency message that is fed back to the generative machine learning system. The generative system then produces second candidate speech data representing a second candidate speech segment in a second candidate voice as a function of the inconsistency message. The target timbre data in the timbre space is refined using information produced by the generative and/or discriminative system as a result of the feeding back, and the source speech data is transformed into the target timbre.
The excerpt states the discriminative neural network produces the inconsistency message when there is less than a 95 percent confidence interval that the first candidate voice is the target voice, and that the second candidate speech segment provides a higher probability of being identified as the target voice by the discriminator than the first candidate speech segment.
What the excerpt does not establish: It provides only a truncated summary/definitions section — the full claims, detailed description, drawings, and figures are omitted, so claim scope cannot be verified here. It also does not establish litigation, validity, or prior art.
Generated 10/1/2026, 9:33:40 PM
Cases on file (0)
Specific litigation cases in our database that name US patent 10614826. The free-form analysis below may also discuss cases beyond this list.
No cases on file mention this patent. Upload a CSV or add a case manually in Admin → Manage litigation cases.
Litigation summary
Past and pending lawsuits — plaintiffs, defendants, jurisdictions, outcomes, and notable rulings.
Proceedings on file (0)
All PTAB activity →AIA trial proceedings (IPR / PGR / CBM) filed at the USPTO Patent Trial and Appeal Board against this patent. Sourced from the USPTO Open Data Portal and refreshed every six hours; each proceeding number deep-links to the PTAB E2E docket.
No PTAB proceedings on file. This patent has not been challenged via IPR, PGR, or CBM. The absence is itself a signal — well-asserted patents eventually attract IPRs. The LLM analysis below may surface filings the ODP feed hasn’t indexed yet.
PTAB challenges
AIA trial proceedings at the USPTO Patent Trial and Appeal Board — IPR, PGR, and CBM. Petitioners, judge panels, claim-level invalidation outcomes from Final Written Decisions, and Federal Circuit appeals. The single most important defensive datapoint after litigation history.
Assignment history
Inventors, original assignee, and the chain of ownership recorded with the USPTO — including the correspondent attorney who recorded each assignment, since shell-LLC chains often share one repeat-player attorney even when the entity names look unrelated. Surfaces NPE / patent-troll patterns: shell-entity transfers, known asserters in the chain, repeat correspondent fingerprints, pre-litigation assignments, and bankruptcy fire-sales.
Prior art
Earlier patents, publications, and products that may anticipate or render the claims unpatentable.
Obviousness
Combinations of prior art that suggest the claimed invention would have been obvious under 35 U.S.C. § 103.
Extensions
Patent term adjustments, term extensions, continuations, divisionals, family members, and expiration dates.
Derivative works
Defensive disclosure: derivative variations of each claim designed to render future incremental improvements obvious or non-novel.