Invalidity dossier

US 10609527

Added 10/14/2026, 12:01:07 PM

At a glanceNo PTAB challengesNo litigation on file

Active provider: DeepSeek · deepseek-flash

Patent summary

Title, assignee, inventors, filing/issue dates, abstract, and a plain-language overview of the claims.

✓ Generated

Patent Overview: US10609527B2

Title: System and method for control and management of resources for consumers of information

Patent number: US10609527B2 | Application number: US16/243,436 | Inventor: Shamim A. Naqvi

Assignee: Current assignee listed as SENSAY TECHNOLOGIES LLC; original assignee Sensoriant Inc. (per the supplied record).

Key dates (as listed; the source notes these are assumptions, not legal conclusions):

  • Priority date: 2010-07-21 (claimed from US12/804,448)
  • Filing date: 2019-01-09
  • Publication of US20190208382A1: 2019-07-04
  • Grant/publication of US10609527B2: 2020-03-31
  • Anticipated expiration: 2030-07-21
  • Legal status: Active

Purpose (per the supplied text): The invention "relates to the delivery, discovery, management and control of information to mobile consumers, and to the efficient use and control of these resources to consume and generate information." It addresses the difficulty mobile users face finding useful apps amid large app stores and the fact that mobile users often do not actively search.

Plain-language scope (per the supplied text): The system defines one or more "situational profiles" based on sensory data received from a mobile device. Using sensory data collected from the device and its environment, it infers the user's situation or environment, then makes recommendations—apps, coupons, or advertisements—associated with a corresponding situational profile. Recommendations may be delivered via text or e-mail messaging, and a given recommendation may be based on a contract with a service or application provider. A telecommunications method described includes accessing a real-time sensory database (based, for example, on an environment map) and a rules database. The rules database includes rules defining antecedents and a resulting consequent, which can be the name of a situational profile, with recommendations made based on that profile.

Source: https://patents.google.com/patent/[US10609527](/patent/US10609527)/en

What the excerpt does not establish: It provides no claim language or full specification, so the precise metes and bounds of the claims cannot be determined. It is explicitly an excerpt with omitted text. It does not establish the accuracy of the listed assignees, dates, or legal status (the source itself disclaims these as assumptions). It contains no findings on litigation, ownership transfers, validity, or prior art, and none are offered here.

Generated 10/14/2026, 12:01:36 PM

Cases on file (0)

Specific litigation cases in our database that name US patent 10609527. The free-form analysis below may also discuss cases beyond this list.

No cases on file mention this patent. Upload a CSV or add a case manually in Admin → Manage litigation cases.

Litigation summary

Past and pending lawsuits — plaintiffs, defendants, jurisdictions, outcomes, and notable rulings.

Log in to generate
Not generated yet. Log in to request this analysis.

Proceedings on file (0)

All PTAB activity →

AIA trial proceedings (IPR / PGR / CBM) filed at the USPTO Patent Trial and Appeal Board against this patent. Sourced from the USPTO Open Data Portal and refreshed every six hours; each proceeding number deep-links to the PTAB E2E docket.

No PTAB proceedings on file. This patent has not been challenged via IPR, PGR, or CBM. The absence is itself a signal — well-asserted patents eventually attract IPRs. The LLM analysis below may surface filings the ODP feed hasn’t indexed yet.

PTAB challenges

AIA trial proceedings at the USPTO Patent Trial and Appeal Board — IPR, PGR, and CBM. Petitioners, judge panels, claim-level invalidation outcomes from Final Written Decisions, and Federal Circuit appeals. The single most important defensive datapoint after litigation history.

Log in to generate
Not generated yet. Log in to request this analysis.

Assignment history

Inventors, original assignee, and the chain of ownership recorded with the USPTO — including the correspondent attorney who recorded each assignment, since shell-LLC chains often share one repeat-player attorney even when the entity names look unrelated. Surfaces NPE / patent-troll patterns: shell-entity transfers, known asserters in the chain, repeat correspondent fingerprints, pre-litigation assignments, and bankruptcy fire-sales.

Log in to generate
Not generated yet. Log in to request this analysis.

Prior art

Earlier patents, publications, and products that may anticipate or render the claims unpatentable.

Log in to generate
Not generated yet. Log in to request this analysis.

Obviousness

Combinations of prior art that suggest the claimed invention would have been obvious under 35 U.S.C. § 103.

Log in to generate
Not generated yet. Log in to request this analysis.

Extensions

Patent term adjustments, term extensions, continuations, divisionals, family members, and expiration dates.

Log in to generate
Not generated yet. Log in to request this analysis.

Derivative works

Defensive disclosure: derivative variations of each claim designed to render future incremental improvements obvious or non-novel.

Log in to generate
Not generated yet. Log in to request this analysis.