Invalidity dossier
US 10544228
Added 9/21/2026, 10:21:07 AM
Active provider: DeepSeek · deepseek-flash
Patent summary
Title, assignee, inventors, filing/issue dates, abstract, and a plain-language overview of the claims.
Patent Overview — US10544228B2
Title: Nucleic acids encoding antibody polypeptides that antagonize CD40
Source: https://patents.google.com/patent/[US10544228](/patent/US10544228)/en
Bibliographic data (as shown in the excerpt): Patent number US10544228B2; application US15/259,828; filed 2016-09-08; granted 2020-01-28; priority date 2011-04-21; adjusted expiration 2034-10-02; status listed as Active. Current assignees listed as Domantis Ltd and Bristol Myers Squibb Co. Inventors listed: Anish Suri, Steven Sheriff, Suzanne Suchard, Aaron Yamniuk, Stanley Krystek, James Tamura, James Bryson, Steven Grant, Philip Drew. A prior-art keyword listing includes "bms3h," "antibody," "amino acid," "variable domain," and "seq." Classifications place it in C07K16/2878 (antibodies against NGF-receptor/TNF-receptor superfamily, e.g. CD27, CD30, CD40, CD95), with additional A61K and A61P therapeutic classifications.
Purpose: The title states the subject matter is nucleic acids encoding antibody polypeptides that antagonize CD40 — i.e., the claimed nucleic acids encode antibody polypeptides characterized by CD40-antagonist activity.
Plain-language scope (as far as the excerpt shows): Based only on the supplied text, the patent concerns nucleic acid molecules that encode antibody polypeptides capable of antagonizing CD40, an immune cell surface receptor. The classification and litigation/homepage metadata do not themselves define claim scope.
What the excerpt does not establish:
- The actual wording of any claim, and therefore the precise metes and bounds of the monopoly.
- The specific nucleotide or amino acid sequences (SEQ ID NOs) covered, antibody formats, CDR sequences, or CD40-binding properties.
- Whether, or how, the nucleic acids are used in expression systems, vectors, host cells, pharmaceutical compositions, or treatment methods.
- The identity of any prior art or the basis of patentability.
- The completeness of the specification, figures, or claims, which are not reproduced here.
The excerpt contains bibliographic and classification metadata and images only; the substantive description and claims are omitted. No litigation status, ownership history, validity, or prior-art conclusions are drawn here.
Generated 10/1/2026, 10:01:45 PM
Cases on file (0)
Specific litigation cases in our database that name US patent 10544228. The free-form analysis below may also discuss cases beyond this list.
No cases on file mention this patent. Upload a CSV or add a case manually in Admin → Manage litigation cases.
Litigation summary
Past and pending lawsuits — plaintiffs, defendants, jurisdictions, outcomes, and notable rulings.
Proceedings on file (0)
All PTAB activity →AIA trial proceedings (IPR / PGR / CBM) filed at the USPTO Patent Trial and Appeal Board against this patent. Sourced from the USPTO Open Data Portal and refreshed every six hours; each proceeding number deep-links to the PTAB E2E docket.
No PTAB proceedings on file. This patent has not been challenged via IPR, PGR, or CBM. The absence is itself a signal — well-asserted patents eventually attract IPRs. The LLM analysis below may surface filings the ODP feed hasn’t indexed yet.
PTAB challenges
AIA trial proceedings at the USPTO Patent Trial and Appeal Board — IPR, PGR, and CBM. Petitioners, judge panels, claim-level invalidation outcomes from Final Written Decisions, and Federal Circuit appeals. The single most important defensive datapoint after litigation history.
Assignment history
Inventors, original assignee, and the chain of ownership recorded with the USPTO — including the correspondent attorney who recorded each assignment, since shell-LLC chains often share one repeat-player attorney even when the entity names look unrelated. Surfaces NPE / patent-troll patterns: shell-entity transfers, known asserters in the chain, repeat correspondent fingerprints, pre-litigation assignments, and bankruptcy fire-sales.
Prior art
Earlier patents, publications, and products that may anticipate or render the claims unpatentable.
Obviousness
Combinations of prior art that suggest the claimed invention would have been obvious under 35 U.S.C. § 103.
Extensions
Patent term adjustments, term extensions, continuations, divisionals, family members, and expiration dates.
Derivative works
Defensive disclosure: derivative variations of each claim designed to render future incremental improvements obvious or non-novel.