Invalidity dossier

US 10512363

Multi-zone food holding bin

Current assignee: Marmon Foodservice Technologies Inc

Added 10/3/2026, 12:00:19 AM

At a glanceActive PTAB challengeNo litigation on file

Active provider: DeepSeek · deepseek-flash

Patent summary

Title, assignee, inventors, filing/issue dates, abstract, and a plain-language overview of the claims.

✓ Generated

Patent Overview — US10512363B2

Title: Multi-zone food holding bin

Assignee (per source): Current assignee listed as Marmon Foodservice Technologies Inc; original assignee Prince Castle LLC.

Key dates: Priority date 2016-04-20; application US15/984,760 filed 2018-05-21; published as US20180266696A1 on 2018-09-20; granted as US10512363B2 on 2019-12-24. Anticipated expiration listed as 2036-04-20. Legal status listed as Active.

Inventors: Kyle Thomas Kestner; Christopher B. Lyons, Jr.; Charles B. Hartfelder; Zachary N. McCoy.

Purpose: Fast food restaurants often pre-cook food and hold it for sale. Known holding bins keep food warm using heating elements, but holding time is limited — generally less than 15 or 20 minutes before the food must be discarded — causing waste and added cost.

Plain-language scope (from the excerpt): A multi-zone food holding bin 10 includes two (or more) separate food holding compartments 50. Each compartment has two or more separate food holding zones (e.g., first zone 57a and second zone 57b), and each zone may include two food holding bays (51a/51b and 51c/51d). Each bay can receive a single food holding tray 27 and/or a single lid 21. Bays are shown separated by dashed lines that are for illustration only; no physical boundary or indicia is required. Each zone can be configured to maintain a different food holding temperature, so different food products with different heating requirements can be held in the same compartment — enabling energy efficiencies and potentially reducing space requirements. Within a zone, bays are held at one temperature by independently controllable upper and lower heating elements; products placed together must have substantially the same temperature requirements.

Source: https://patents.google.com/patent/[US10512363](/patent/US10512363)/en

What the excerpt does not establish: It provides no full claim language, no complete written description, no prior-art references or citations, and no figures. The excerpt is expressly partial and notes omitted text, so claim scope, claim count, dependencies, and any limitations beyond the described embodiments cannot be determined from it. Classification entries and prosecution history are likewise not established here.

Generated 10/3/2026, 12:00:48 AM

Cases on file (0)

Specific litigation cases in our database that name US patent 10512363. The free-form analysis below may also discuss cases beyond this list.

No cases on file mention this patent. Upload a CSV or add a case manually in Admin → Manage litigation cases.

Litigation summary

Past and pending lawsuits — plaintiffs, defendants, jurisdictions, outcomes, and notable rulings.

Log in to generate
Not generated yet. Log in to request this analysis.

Proceedings on file (1)

All PTAB activity →

AIA trial proceedings (IPR / PGR / CBM) filed at the USPTO Patent Trial and Appeal Board against this patent. Sourced from the USPTO Open Data Portal and refreshed every six hours; each proceeding number deep-links to the PTAB E2E docket.

1 active
Pending
Filed
Oct 2, 2026
Last modified
Oct 22, 2026
Petitioner
Duke Manufacturing Co.
Inventor
Kyle Thomas Kestner et al

PTAB challenges

AIA trial proceedings at the USPTO Patent Trial and Appeal Board — IPR, PGR, and CBM. Petitioners, judge panels, claim-level invalidation outcomes from Final Written Decisions, and Federal Circuit appeals. The single most important defensive datapoint after litigation history.

Log in to generate
Not generated yet. Log in to request this analysis.

Assignment history

Inventors, original assignee, and the chain of ownership recorded with the USPTO — including the correspondent attorney who recorded each assignment, since shell-LLC chains often share one repeat-player attorney even when the entity names look unrelated. Surfaces NPE / patent-troll patterns: shell-entity transfers, known asserters in the chain, repeat correspondent fingerprints, pre-litigation assignments, and bankruptcy fire-sales.

Log in to generate
Not generated yet. Log in to request this analysis.

Prior art

Earlier patents, publications, and products that may anticipate or render the claims unpatentable.

Log in to generate
Not generated yet. Log in to request this analysis.

Obviousness

Combinations of prior art that suggest the claimed invention would have been obvious under 35 U.S.C. § 103.

Log in to generate
Not generated yet. Log in to request this analysis.

Extensions

Patent term adjustments, term extensions, continuations, divisionals, family members, and expiration dates.

Log in to generate
Not generated yet. Log in to request this analysis.

Derivative works

Defensive disclosure: derivative variations of each claim designed to render future incremental improvements obvious or non-novel.

Log in to generate
Not generated yet. Log in to request this analysis.