- Filed
- May 13, 2026
- Last modified
- Jun 24, 2026
- Petitioner
- Meta Platforms, Inc.
- Inventor
- Erik R. Swenson et al
Patent 10484442
PTAB challenges
AIA trial proceedings at the USPTO Patent Trial and Appeal Board — IPR, PGR, and CBM. Petitioners, judge panels, claim-level invalidation outcomes from Final Written Decisions, and Federal Circuit appeals. The single most important defensive datapoint after litigation history.
Active provider: Google · gemini-2.5-flash
Proceedings on file (1)
All PTAB activity →AIA trial proceedings (IPR / PGR / CBM) filed at the USPTO Patent Trial and Appeal Board against this patent. Sourced from the USPTO Open Data Portal and refreshed every six hours; each proceeding number deep-links to the PTAB E2E docket.
Current assignee: Meta Platforms Inc.
PTAB challenges
AIA trial proceedings at the USPTO Patent Trial and Appeal Board — IPR, PGR, and CBM. Petitioners, judge panels, claim-level invalidation outcomes from Final Written Decisions, and Federal Circuit appeals. The single most important defensive datapoint after litigation history.
Proceedings overview
There is one pending AIA trial proceeding associated with US Patent 10484442. This proceeding is an Inter Partes Review (IPR) initiated by Meta Platforms, Inc. The IPR is currently in a pending status, meaning no final decision on institution or the merits of the patentability of the claims has been reached. Therefore, the patent claims remain untested by a final PTAB decision, and the patent's defensive posture for a defendant is still evolving.
IPR2026-00347 — Meta Platforms, Inc. v. Tir Technologies Ltd
- Type: Inter Partes Review
- Filed: 2026-05-13
- Status: Pending. This IPR was filed recently and has not yet reached the institution decision stage.
- Judge panel: Not yet assigned or publicly available.
- Petition grounds: Details of the claims challenged, prior art asserted, and statutory bases (§ 102 / § 103 / § 112) are not yet publicly available in detail, as the petition is still in the early stages of the PTAB process.
- Institution decision: Not yet issued. The deadline for the institution decision is approximately six months from the filing date, around 2026-11-13.
- Final Written Decision (if issued): Not applicable, as the proceeding is pending.
- Settlement / termination: Not applicable, as the proceeding is pending.
- Appeal: Not applicable, as the proceeding is pending.
- Defensive value: This proceeding indicates that at least some claims of US10484442 are being challenged for patentability by Meta Platforms, Inc. The outcome of this IPR, particularly the institution decision, will be critical. If instituted, it could lead to cancellation of claims or provide a stronger basis for challenging the patent. If institution is denied, it would suggest the PTAB found the petition unlikely to succeed.
Strategic summary
Currently, all claims of US10484442 are UNTESTED by a final PTAB decision. The single Inter Partes Review, IPR2026-00347, is still in its preliminary stages, with the petition having been filed recently by Meta Platforms, Inc. As of today, there has been no decision on whether the PTAB will institute the review, and consequently, no claims have been canceled or confirmed as patentable through an FWD.
The estoppel landscape is not yet defined by any final written decision. If IPR2026-00347 is instituted and proceeds to an FWD, 35 U.S.C. § 315(e)(2) would bar Meta Platforms, Inc. (and its privies) from asserting in future civil actions or other USPTO proceedings any ground of unpatentability that was raised or reasonably could have been raised during the IPR with respect to any claim surviving the IPR. Until then, all prior-art grounds remain potentially available for other defendants. The filing by Meta Platforms, Inc. signals active interest in challenging the patent's validity.
Recommended next steps
For a defendant facing assertion of US10484442, the primary focus should be on monitoring IPR2026-00347. The next significant milestone will be the institution decision, expected around 2026-11-13. This decision will indicate which, if any, claims the PTAB believes are likely unpatentable.
- Monitor the PTAB docket for IPR2026-00347 at the USPTO Patent Trial and Appeal Board End-to-End System (PTAB E2E) once the public docket is available.
- If the IPR is instituted, closely examine the institution decision to understand the specific claims challenged and the PTAB's initial reasoning, as this will inform potential defensive strategies.
- If you are an accused infringer, consider whether to file your own IPR petition or join IPR2026-00347, keeping in mind the statutory deadlines and potential estoppel effects.## Proceedings overview
There is one pending AIA trial proceeding associated with US Patent 10484442. This proceeding is an Inter Partes Review (IPR) initiated by Meta Platforms, Inc., which is currently in a pending status. This means no final decision on institution or the merits of the patentability of the claims has been reached. Therefore, the patent claims remain untested by a final PTAB decision, and the patent's defensive posture for a defendant is still evolving.
IPR2026-00347 — Meta Platforms, Inc. v. Tir Technologies Ltd
- Type: Inter Partes Review
- Filed: 2026-05-13
- Status: Pending. This IPR was filed recently and has not yet reached the institution decision stage.
- Judge panel: Not yet publicly available, as the proceeding is in its early stages.
- Petition grounds: Details regarding the specific claims challenged, the prior art cited, and the statutory bases (§ 102 / § 103 / § 112) are not yet publicly available in detail.
- Institution decision: Not yet issued. The statutory deadline for the institution decision is approximately six months from the filing date of the petition, placing it around 2026-11-13.
- Final Written Decision (if issued): Not applicable, as the proceeding is pending.
- Settlement / termination: Not applicable, as the proceeding is pending.
- Appeal: Not applicable, as the proceeding is pending.
- Defensive value: This pending IPR indicates that Meta Platforms, Inc. is challenging the patentability of at least some claims of US10484442. The outcome of the institution decision will be a critical indicator for any potential defendant. If the IPR is instituted, it suggests the PTAB found a reasonable likelihood of unpatentability for the challenged claims, which could strengthen a defense against assertions of the patent. If institution is denied, it would imply the PTAB did not find the petition's grounds persuasive enough, making an IPR-based defense harder for others on similar grounds.
Strategic summary
Currently, all claims of US10484442 are UNTESTED by a final PTAB decision. The single Inter Partes Review, IPR2026-00347, initiated by Meta Platforms, Inc., is in its very early stages. No decision on institution has been made, meaning no claims have been canceled or confirmed as patentable through an FWD by the PTAB.
The estoppel landscape related to this patent is not yet established because IPR2026-00347 has not progressed to a final written decision. If the IPR is instituted and an FWD is issued, 35 U.S.C. § 315(e)(2) would typically bar Meta Platforms, Inc. (and its privies) from raising any ground of unpatentability that was raised or reasonably could have been raised in the IPR in future civil actions or other USPTO proceedings with respect to claims that survive the IPR. However, for other potential defendants, all prior-art grounds remain potentially available for challenging the patent until an FWD is issued. The filing of this IPR by Meta Platforms, Inc. signals that at least one major entity finds merit in challenging the patent's validity.
Recommended next steps
For any party concerned with US10484442, the immediate priority is to monitor the progress of IPR2026-00347.
- The most significant upcoming milestone is the institution decision, expected by approximately 2026-11-13. This decision will be publicly available on the USPTO Patent Trial and Appeal Board End-to-End System (PTAB E2E) portal.
- Upon issuance, thoroughly review the institution decision to understand which claims, if any, were successfully challenged and the PTAB's reasoning for institution or denial. This will provide valuable insight into the patent's likely validity and the strength of the petitioner's arguments.
- If the IPR is instituted, and if you are an accused infringer, assess whether your own defensive posture could benefit from a separate IPR petition or potential joinder, considering statutory deadlines and the evolving estoppel implications.
Generated 5/22/2026, 12:47:02 PM