Invalidity dossier

US 10126257

Device and method for non-invasive detection of hazardous materials in the aquatic environment

Current assignee: Jagiellonian University

Added 9/23/2026, 7:49:11 PM

At a glanceNo PTAB challengesNo litigation on file

Active provider: DeepSeek · deepseek-flash

Patent summary

Title, assignee, inventors, filing/issue dates, abstract, and a plain-language overview of the claims.

✓ Generated

Patent Overview — US 10,126,257 B2

Title: Device and method for non-invasive detection of hazardous materials in the aquatic environment

Assignee: Uniwersytet Jagiellonski (original assignee; assignment recorded 2017-04-12 to inventors Moskal and Silarski). Inventors: Michal Silarski and Pawel Moskal.

Key dates: Priority date 2014-09-07; filing date 2015-06-08; publication of US20170254763A1 on 2017-09-07; patent granted/publication 2018-11-13. Status shown as "Expired – Fee Related," with anticipated expiration 2035-06-08 — this is a listed legal-status assumption, not a legal conclusion.

Purpose: To detect hazardous substances such as war remnants, mines, and war gases in underwater environments (notably contaminated Baltic areas like Little Belt, Bornholm Deep, and the Gotland Deep). The stated technical problem is providing higher sensitivity, lower background/noise, more accurate detection of deeply buried objects, and determination of a substance's density distribution.

Plain-language scope (from the Definitions section): The device uses a sealed housing containing a fast neutron generator surrounded by an alpha-particle detector and a gamma-quantum detector. Neutrons are emitted toward a tested object; the gamma detector registers characteristic gamma quanta emitted by nuclei of the object after neutron irradiation. The improvement is the addition of neutrons and/or gamma-quanta guides connected to the generator and detector. Guides may be telescopic cylinders with closed bases, evacuated or gas-filled (air, helium, argon), made of stainless steel, aluminum, or carbon fibers, and lined with a neutron-reflecting layer (preferably graphite). The angle between guides is variable (0–90 degrees), enabling depth/area variation and density-distribution measurement. Gamma quanta may be detected in coincidence with alpha particles to reduce background. The method claims include collimating fast neutrons, transmission through guides, coincidence detection, and position/time measurement of guides and gamma registration.

Not established by this excerpt: All claims and the full specification (text was truncated at detector 111); figures' visual content; exact claim language; and the excerpt's completeness. No litigation, ownership-transfer, validity, or prior-art analysis is included.

Source: https://patents.google.com/patent/US10126257/en

Generated 10/1/2026, 9:41:47 PM

Cases on file (0)

Specific litigation cases in our database that name US patent 10126257. The free-form analysis below may also discuss cases beyond this list.

No cases on file mention this patent. Upload a CSV or add a case manually in Admin → Manage litigation cases.

Litigation summary

Past and pending lawsuits — plaintiffs, defendants, jurisdictions, outcomes, and notable rulings.

Log in to generate
Not generated yet. Log in to request this analysis.

Proceedings on file (0)

All PTAB activity →

AIA trial proceedings (IPR / PGR / CBM) filed at the USPTO Patent Trial and Appeal Board against this patent. Sourced from the USPTO Open Data Portal and refreshed every six hours; each proceeding number deep-links to the PTAB E2E docket.

No PTAB proceedings on file. This patent has not been challenged via IPR, PGR, or CBM. The absence is itself a signal — well-asserted patents eventually attract IPRs. The LLM analysis below may surface filings the ODP feed hasn’t indexed yet.

PTAB challenges

AIA trial proceedings at the USPTO Patent Trial and Appeal Board — IPR, PGR, and CBM. Petitioners, judge panels, claim-level invalidation outcomes from Final Written Decisions, and Federal Circuit appeals. The single most important defensive datapoint after litigation history.

Log in to generate
Not generated yet. Log in to request this analysis.

Assignment history

Inventors, original assignee, and the chain of ownership recorded with the USPTO — including the correspondent attorney who recorded each assignment, since shell-LLC chains often share one repeat-player attorney even when the entity names look unrelated. Surfaces NPE / patent-troll patterns: shell-entity transfers, known asserters in the chain, repeat correspondent fingerprints, pre-litigation assignments, and bankruptcy fire-sales.

Log in to generate
Not generated yet. Log in to request this analysis.

Prior art

Earlier patents, publications, and products that may anticipate or render the claims unpatentable.

Log in to generate
Not generated yet. Log in to request this analysis.

Obviousness

Combinations of prior art that suggest the claimed invention would have been obvious under 35 U.S.C. § 103.

Log in to generate
Not generated yet. Log in to request this analysis.

Extensions

Patent term adjustments, term extensions, continuations, divisionals, family members, and expiration dates.

Log in to generate
Not generated yet. Log in to request this analysis.

Derivative works

Defensive disclosure: derivative variations of each claim designed to render future incremental improvements obvious or non-novel.

Log in to generate
Not generated yet. Log in to request this analysis.