- Filed
- Oct 14, 2026
- Last modified
- Oct 14, 2026
- Petitioner
- Treace Medical Concepts, Inc.
- Inventor
- Matthew P. Gephart
Invalidity dossier
US 10123831
Added 10/15/2026, 12:00:11 AM
Active provider: DeepSeek · deepseek-flash
Patent summary
Title, assignee, inventors, filing/issue dates, abstract, and a plain-language overview of the claims.
Patent Overview — US 10,123,831 B2
Title: Bone compression device and method
Inventor: Matthew P. Gephart
Original Assignee: Pioneer Surgical Technology, Inc. (later recorded assignees include RTI Surgical, Inc. and Paragon 28, Inc.)
Application No.: US 15/058,695 | Publication: US 2016/0256203 A1
Priority Date: 2015-03-03 | Filing Date: 2016-03-02 | Grant Date: 2018-11-13
Legal Status: Active; adjusted expiration listed as 2036-10-21 (a stated assumption, not a legal conclusion)
Purpose and Plain-Language Scope: The supplied text describes the invention as relating to a "bone compression device and method," classified under A61B17/80 (cortical bone plates) and A61B17/808 (instruments for holding or positioning bone plates). The classification places the subject matter in the field of internal bone fixation, specifically cortical plates used to compress bones, and instruments for holding, positioning, or adjusting screw-to-plate locking mechanisms. Related classifications include drill/wire guides for bone plate holes (A61B17/1728).
Plain-language scope: Based on the excerpt alone, the patent concerns a device and method for compressing bone — likely a bone plate system and associated instrumentation — used in osteosynthesis to hold bone fragments or segments together. The prior-art keywords listed ("bone plate," "bone," "manipulators," "bones," "end portions") suggest claims or disclosure involving a bone plate with end portions and manipulators for applying compression.
What the excerpt does not establish:
- The specific claims, claim language, or independent/dependent claim structure
- The precise mechanical configuration, components, or method steps of the device
- Any embodiments, figures, or detailed description (the text notes omitted content)
- Whether the device is indicated for a particular anatomical site (e.g., foot, ankle, hand)
- The relationship between this patent and related applications (US 16/164,899; US 17/158,628) beyond recorded priority events
- Any legal conclusions regarding validity, enforceability, or claim scope
Per instructions, no litigation, ownership-transfer analysis, validity, or prior-art research was performed.
Generated 10/15/2026, 12:00:51 AM
Cases on file (0)
Specific litigation cases in our database that name US patent 10123831. The free-form analysis below may also discuss cases beyond this list.
No cases on file mention this patent. Upload a CSV or add a case manually in Admin → Manage litigation cases.
Litigation summary
Past and pending lawsuits — plaintiffs, defendants, jurisdictions, outcomes, and notable rulings.
Proceedings on file (1)
All PTAB activity →AIA trial proceedings (IPR / PGR / CBM) filed at the USPTO Patent Trial and Appeal Board against this patent. Sourced from the USPTO Open Data Portal and refreshed every six hours; each proceeding number deep-links to the PTAB E2E docket.
PTAB challenges
AIA trial proceedings at the USPTO Patent Trial and Appeal Board — IPR, PGR, and CBM. Petitioners, judge panels, claim-level invalidation outcomes from Final Written Decisions, and Federal Circuit appeals. The single most important defensive datapoint after litigation history.
Assignment history
Inventors, original assignee, and the chain of ownership recorded with the USPTO — including the correspondent attorney who recorded each assignment, since shell-LLC chains often share one repeat-player attorney even when the entity names look unrelated. Surfaces NPE / patent-troll patterns: shell-entity transfers, known asserters in the chain, repeat correspondent fingerprints, pre-litigation assignments, and bankruptcy fire-sales.
Prior art
Earlier patents, publications, and products that may anticipate or render the claims unpatentable.
Obviousness
Combinations of prior art that suggest the claimed invention would have been obvious under 35 U.S.C. § 103.
Extensions
Patent term adjustments, term extensions, continuations, divisionals, family members, and expiration dates.
Derivative works
Defensive disclosure: derivative variations of each claim designed to render future incremental improvements obvious or non-novel.