Patent 10090567
PTAB challenges
AIA trial proceedings at the USPTO Patent Trial and Appeal Board — IPR, PGR, and CBM. Petitioners, judge panels, claim-level invalidation outcomes from Final Written Decisions, and Federal Circuit appeals. The single most important defensive datapoint after litigation history.
Active provider: Google · gemini-2.5-flash
Proceedings on file (0)
All PTAB activity →AIA trial proceedings (IPR / PGR / CBM) filed at the USPTO Patent Trial and Appeal Board against this patent. Sourced from the USPTO Open Data Portal and refreshed every six hours; each proceeding number deep-links to the PTAB E2E docket.
No PTAB proceedings on file. This patent has not been challenged via IPR, PGR, or CBM. The absence is itself a signal — well-asserted patents eventually attract IPRs. The LLM analysis below may surface filings the ODP feed hasn’t indexed yet.
PTAB challenges
AIA trial proceedings at the USPTO Patent Trial and Appeal Board — IPR, PGR, and CBM. Petitioners, judge panels, claim-level invalidation outcomes from Final Written Decisions, and Federal Circuit appeals. The single most important defensive datapoint after litigation history.
Proceedings overview
There are no AIA trial proceedings on file for US Patent 10090567 as of today's date, June 9, 2026. The USPTO Open Data Portal (ODP) API returns no AIA trial proceedings for this patent, and web searches did not surface any additional proceedings.
Strategic summary
Currently, all claims of US Patent 10090567 remain untested by AIA trial proceedings. This means that no claims have been canceled or sustained through IPR, PGR, or CBM trials. For a defendant facing assertion of this patent, the full scope of prior art grounds under 35 U.S.C. §§ 102 and 103 (and potentially § 112 for PGR/CBM) remains available for potential challenges at the PTAB, subject to statutory time bars (e.g., one year from service of a complaint alleging infringement for IPRs, or nine months from patent grant for PGRs). The absence of PTAB activity suggests that the patent has not yet been subject to the rigorous challenge often seen with frequently asserted patents.
Recommended next steps
Since no PTAB activity exists for US Patent 10090567, a defendant facing assertion should consider filing an AIA trial petition (IPR or PGR, if applicable) if a strong prior art challenge can be mounted. The lack of prior PTAB challenges means there is no estoppel landscape from previous proceedings, leaving all eligible prior art arguments open. Further investigation into potential prior art not considered during examination would be a crucial first step.
Generated 6/9/2026, 12:02:40 AM