The docket

Patent litigations.

6,606 cases tracked. Click any row for full case detail; use the buckets below to slice by patent, plaintiff, or defendant. Manage cases (upload CSV, edit, delete) in Admin.

Demand letter analyzer

You got a patent demand letter. Now what?

Paste the letter — we extract the asserted patents, identify the asserter, characterize their litigation history, flag validity vulnerabilities, and draft a sample response letter your attorney can review. Free, private, ~2-3 minutes.

Analyze a letter →

Patent litigation filed per year

1986: 2 cases'861988: 1 case1990: 1 case'901992: 1 case1993: 1 case'941996: 3 cases1997: 2 cases1998: 3 cases'981999: 3 cases2000: 3 cases2001: 5 cases'022003: 10 cases2004: 4 cases2005: 13 cases2006: 15 cases'062007: 17 cases2008: 20 cases2009: 12 cases2010: 39 cases'102011: 36 cases2012: 68 cases2013: 110 cases2014: 95 cases'142015: 107 cases2016: 103 cases2017: 163 cases2018: 171 cases'182019: 198 cases2020: 226 cases2021: 254 cases2022: 358 cases'222023: 321 cases2024: 548 cases2025: 758 cases7582026: 333 cases'26
6,606 tracked cases by filing year.

Analyze a patent

Drop a US patent number — we’ll verify it on Google Patents and generate the full invalidity dossier.

By industry

All litigations

CasePatentsCourtFiledStatus
VirtaMove Corp. v. Oracle CorporationTexas——
VirtaMove Corp. v. Microsoft CorporationTexas——
VirtaMove Corp. v. Hewlett Packard EnterpriseTexas——
VirtaMove Corp. v. International Business Machines CorporationTexas——
Red Hat, Inc. v. VirtaMove, Corp.5:24-cv-04740-PCPU.S. District Court for the Northern District of California—Dismissed
Pantech Corporation et al. v. OnePlus Technology (Shenzhen) Co., Ltd.U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas—Claim construction phase
Skysong Innovations, LLC v. Fortinet, Inc.2:25-cv-00098U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas——
Skysong Innovations, LLC v. CrowdStrike, Inc. et al.7:25-cv-00040U.S. District Court for the Western District of Texas—Active
Unified Patents, LLC v. Ingeniospec LLCIPR2025-01548USPTO Patent Trial and Appeal Board (PTAB)—Settled
Champion Power Equipment Incorporated v. Firman Power Equipment Incorporated2:23-cv-02371U.S. District Court for the District of Arizona—Active
Harbor Freight Tools USA, Inc. v. Champion Power Equipment, Inc.2:24-cv-08722U.S. District Court for the Central District of California—Active
Untitled case1:26-cv-00316U.S. District Court for the Western District of Texas—Pending
One-E-Way, Inc. v. Dell Technologies Inc.1:24-cv-01558U.S. District Court for the Western District of Texas—Early Stages
One-E-Way, Inc. v. Anker Innovations Limited1:24-cv-01559U.S. District Court for the Western District of Texas—Initial Phases
One-E-Way, Inc. v. Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. et al.1:24-cv-01561U.S. District Court for the Western District of Texas—Early Stages
Unified Patents, LLC v. Marlin Semiconductor Ltd.IPR2025-01444United States Patent and Trademark Office, Patent Trial and Appeal Board (PTAB)—Pending - Instituted
ONE-E-WAY, INC. v. Sony Corporation et al.337-TA-943U.S. International Trade Commission—Active
Cytek Biosciences, Inc. v. Beckman Coulter, Inc.PGR2025-00084U.S. Patent and Trademark Office, Patent Trial and Appeal Board—Terminated
Beckman Coulter, Inc. v. Cytek Biosciences, Inc.1:24-cv-00945U.S. District Court for the District of Delaware—Active
Light Guide Innovations, LLC v. Hisense Company Ltd., et al.2:25-cv-00051-RWS-RSPU.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas—Pending