The docket

Patent litigations.

6,606 cases tracked. Click any row for full case detail; use the buckets below to slice by patent, plaintiff, or defendant. Manage cases (upload CSV, edit, delete) in Admin.

Demand letter analyzer

You got a patent demand letter. Now what?

Paste the letter — we extract the asserted patents, identify the asserter, characterize their litigation history, flag validity vulnerabilities, and draft a sample response letter your attorney can review. Free, private, ~2-3 minutes.

Analyze a letter →

Patent litigation filed per year

1986: 2 cases'861988: 1 case1990: 1 case'901992: 1 case1993: 1 case'941996: 3 cases1997: 2 cases1998: 3 cases'981999: 3 cases2000: 3 cases2001: 5 cases'022003: 10 cases2004: 4 cases2005: 13 cases2006: 15 cases'062007: 17 cases2008: 20 cases2009: 12 cases2010: 39 cases'102011: 36 cases2012: 68 cases2013: 110 cases2014: 95 cases'142015: 107 cases2016: 103 cases2017: 163 cases2018: 171 cases'182019: 198 cases2020: 226 cases2021: 254 cases2022: 358 cases'222023: 321 cases2024: 548 cases2025: 758 cases7582026: 333 cases'26
6,606 tracked cases by filing year.

Analyze a patent

Drop a US patent number — we’ll verify it on Google Patents and generate the full invalidity dossier.

Log in to analyze a patent

By industry

High-Tech (T)(68)Other (O)(43)Medical (M)(5)

All litigations

CasePatentsCourtFiledStatus
Omni MedSci, Inc. v. Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd.2:24-cv-01070-JRG-RSP
9995722
U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas——
Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. v. Omni MedSci, Inc.2:25-cv-00483
9995722
U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas——
Omni MedSci, Inc. v. WHOOP, Inc.1:25-cv-00140-JLH
9995722
U.S. District Court for the District of Delaware——
WHOOP, Inc. v. Omni MedSci, Inc.IPR2025-01583
9995722
USPTO Patent Trial and Appeal Board——
Omni MedSci, Inc. v. Apple Inc.2:18-cv-00134-RWS
975704096515339861286
U.S. District Court, Eastern District of Texas, Marshall Division—transferred
Apple Inc. v. Omni MedSci, Inc.20-1715, 20-1716
9861286
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit—affirmed
Untitled case2:10-cv-10647
6833516
U.S. District Court, Eastern District of Michigan—consolidated
Automotive Technologies International, Inc. v. Delphi Corp. et al.2:08-cv-11048; 2:10-cv-10647
6850824
E.D. Mich. (Judge Robert H. Cleland)—judgment; remanded for settlement
Untitled case1:16-cv-01647
7924156
United States Court of Federal Claims—unknown
InnerCap Technologies, Inc. v. Nouri Life, Inc.1:26-cv-00903
9539216
U.S. District Court for the District of Delaware, Judge Jennifer L. Hall—open
Natals, Inc. d/b/a Ritual v. InnerCap Technologies, Inc.2:26-cv-05696
9539216
U.S. District Court for the Central District of California—open
Untitled case1:14-cv-00574
6888797
U.S. District Court for the District of Delaware——
Douglas G. Richardson v. Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd.6:17-cv-00428
8035644
United States District Court for the Eastern District of Texas—unknown
Cine Graphic Solutions LLC v. FUJIFILM Holdings America Corp. et al.1:21-cv-07917
803564473885877629977
United States District Court for the Southern District of New York—unknown
Untitled case1:21-cv-01840
803564473885877629977
United States District Court for the Northern District of Illinois—unknown
Ramot at Tel Aviv University Ltd. v. Cisco Systems, Inc.2:19-cv-00225-JRG
90314171027053510461866
E.D. Tex. (Judge Rodney Gilstrap)—unknown
Untitled case20-2047
9203425
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit—unconfirmed
Cisco Systems, Inc. v. Ramot at Tel Aviv University Ltd.IPR2020-00122
9203425100334651027053510461866
Patent Trial and Appeal Board (PTAB)—institution denied
Centripetal Networks, LLC v. Palo Alto Networks, Inc.2:21-cv-00137
11683401
U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, Norfolk Division—active
Palo Alto Networks, Inc. v. Centripetal Networks, LLCIPR2021-01150
116834019917856
USPTO Patent Trial and Appeal Board——