Litigation

Travelers Indemnity Co. v. Intellectual Ventures I LLC

Open

1:26-cv-00397

Filed
2026-04-08

Patents at issue (1)

Plaintiffs (1)

Defendants (1)

Summary

This case involves patent infringement claims.

Case overview & background

Plain-language overview of the case: parties, accused product, patents at issue, and why the suit matters.

This patent infringement litigation, Travelers Indemnity Co. v. Intellectual Ventures I LLC, was filed on April 8, 2026, in the Delaware District Court and is currently open. The plaintiff, Travelers Indemnity Co., is a prominent insurance company providing a wide range of services including aircraft, automobile, fire, marine, property, and casualty insurance. The defendant, Intellectual Ventures I LLC, is a private equity company primarily focused on the development and licensing of intellectual property, often described as a patent monetization firm or "patent troll." Its business model involves acquiring patents and either licensing them to third parties or pursuing legal damages against alleged infringers.

The sole patent at issue in this case is U.S. Patent No. 7,257,582, titled "Load balancing with shared data." While the specific accused product, service, or technology of Travelers Indemnity Co. is not detailed in the initial public filings, based on Intellectual Ventures' past litigation patterns against other insurance companies, the allegations likely pertain to Travelers' internal data management, IT infrastructure, or software systems that handle shared data and load balancing. Previous lawsuits by Intellectual Ventures against insurers have involved patents related to data organization, mobile interfaces, and database searching.

The case is proceeding in the District of Delaware, a frequently chosen venue for patent litigation due to a high volume of corporate incorporations in the state, which, following the TC Heartland Supreme Court decision, makes it a proper venue for many patent cases. The court benefits from an experienced judiciary, predictable procedures, and a well-developed body of patent-specific precedent, offering reliability for both patentees and defendants. This lawsuit is notable as it continues a trend of Intellectual Ventures, a significant non-practicing entity, asserting its patent portfolio against large operating companies, specifically within the financial and insurance sectors. The assignment of a specific judge for this case is not yet publicly available.

Key legal developments & outcome

Major rulings, motions, claim construction, settlements, and the present posture or final disposition.

The case "Travelers Indemnity Co. v. Intellectual Ventures I LLC" (1:26-cv-00397 D. Del.) was filed in the Delaware District Court on April 8, 2026.

Given the very recent filing date, there have been limited substantive legal developments so far.

Filing & Initial Pleadings:

  • Complaint: Travelers Indemnity Co. filed a complaint against Intellectual Ventures I LLC on April 8, 2026, initiating the patent infringement litigation.
  • Stipulation to Extend Time: A stipulation to extend time for the defendant(s) to answer, move, or otherwise respond to the complaint has been filed. This indicates that an answer or substantive motion from Intellectual Ventures I LLC is not yet due or has been postponed.

Pre-trial Motions of Substance:
No significant pre-trial motions (such as motions to dismiss, transfer, or stay pending IPR, or summary judgment motions) have been recorded yet, which is typical for such a recently filed case.

Claim Construction (Markman) Outcomes:
The case has not yet reached the claim construction stage.

Discovery Milestones:
No strategic discovery milestones have been recorded.

Trial Events, Verdict, and Post-Trial Motions:
No trial events, verdicts, or post-trial motions have occurred.

Settlement, Dismissal, Judgment, or Appeal:
The case is still open and active. No settlement, dismissal, judgment, or appeal has occurred.

Parallel PTAB IPR/PGR Proceedings:
A search for IPR/PGR proceedings for the asserted patent, US Patent 7,257,582, reveals that it has been mentioned in other district court cases involving Intellectual Ventures I LLC. For example, it was listed in a related case 1:26-cv-00417, "Munich Re America Services Inc v. Intellectual Ventures I LLC," filed on April 10, 2026. However, a direct IPR or PGR filing specifically challenging US Patent 7,257,582 in relation to this case, or an outcome, is not immediately apparent from the search results. There was an IPR (IPR2025-00840) filed by Docker Inc. against Intellectual Ventures II LLC concerning patent US 8,332,844 B1, where institution was denied on September 19, 2025. However, this IPR concerns a different patent and a different Intellectual Ventures entity, though related cases sometimes involve similar patents or parties. Further search specifically for IPRs on 7,257,582 is needed to confirm if any exist that could impact this litigation.This case is in its very early stages.

Key Legal Developments and Outcome for Travelers Indemnity Co. v. Intellectual Ventures I LLC

Caption: Travelers Indemnity Co. v. Intellectual Ventures I LLC
Case number: 1:26-cv-00397
Court: Delaware District Court
Filed: 2026-04-08
Status: Open
Patents at issue: 7257582

The litigation "Travelers Indemnity Co. v. Intellectual Ventures I LLC" commenced on April 8, 2026, in the District of Delaware and is currently in its nascent stages.

Filing & Initial Pleadings:

  • Complaint: Travelers Indemnity Co. initiated the lawsuit by filing a complaint against Intellectual Ventures I LLC on April 8, 2026, alleging patent infringement of U.S. Patent No. 7,257,582.
  • Stipulation to Extend Time: As of May 21, 2026, a stipulation has been filed to extend the time for the defendant, Intellectual Ventures I LLC, to respond to the complaint. This means an answer, motion to dismiss, or other initial pleading from the defendant is not yet due or has been postponed.

Pre-trial Motions of Substance:
As of the current date (May 30, 2026), no substantive pre-trial motions, such as motions to dismiss, transfer, stay pending IPR, or for summary judgment, have been recorded.

Claim Construction (Markman) Outcomes:
The case has not yet progressed to the claim construction (Markman) stage.

Discovery Milestones:
No significant discovery milestones have occurred due to the early phase of the litigation.

Trial Events, Verdict, and Post-Trial Motions:
No trial events, verdicts, or post-trial motions have taken place.

Settlement, Dismissal, Judgment, or Appeal:
The case remains open and active, with no final disposition, settlement, dismissal, or judgment recorded. No appeal has been filed.

Parallel PTAB IPR/PGR Proceedings:
A review of USPTO Patent Trial and Appeal Board (PTAB) records for U.S. Patent No. 7,257,582 does not indicate any active Inter Partes Review (IPR) or Post-Grant Review (PGR) proceedings directly challenging this specific patent in relation to the current litigation. While the patent at issue (7,257,582) has been listed in other related district court cases involving Intellectual Ventures I LLC, such as Munich Re America Services Inc v. Intellectual Ventures I LLC (1:26-cv-00417, D. Del., filed April 10, 2026), no IPR or PGR specific to this patent impacting the Travelers case has been identified. An IPR (IPR2025-00840) was filed by Docker Inc. against Intellectual Ventures II LLC concerning a different patent (US 8,332,844 B1) in May 2025, with institution denied on September 19, 2025. This IPR is not directly related to the patent in the Travelers case.

Plaintiff representatives

Counsel of record for the plaintiff(s): attorneys, firms, and roles (lead counsel, of counsel, local counsel).

The plaintiff, Travelers Indemnity Co., is represented by a team of attorneys, including lead counsel from Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner, LLP, and local counsel from Faegre Drinker Biddle & Reath LLP.

Here are the identified counsel of record for Travelers Indemnity Co.:

  • Keith A. Walter, Jr.

    • Role: Local Counsel
    • Firm: Faegre Drinker Biddle & Reath LLP
    • Office Location: Wilmington, Delaware
    • Relevant Experience: Keith A. Walter, Jr. advises clients on the development, protection, enforcement, and licensing of intellectual property portfolios. He is a seasoned litigator with experience serving as lead trial counsel in a variety of complex commercial litigations, including intellectual property matters, before judges and juries in U.S. district courts across the country, including the District of Delaware. He also has experience representing clients before the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) and the International Trade Commission (ITC).
  • Joshua L. Goldberg

    • Role: Lead Counsel
    • Firm: Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner, LLP
    • Office Location: Washington, D.C.
    • Relevant Experience: Joshua Goldberg leads Finnegan's PTAB trials section, focusing on inter partes review (IPR), covered business method (CBM), and post-grant review (PGR) proceedings before the USPTO Patent Trial and Appeal Board (PTAB), and appeals to the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit. He has served as lead or backup counsel in over 225 IPRs, CBMs, and PGRs across various technologies, including software, image processing, and consumer electronics. Goldberg previously represented Travelers Indemnity Company in IPRs that resulted in the cancellation of all challenged claims across two patents, with the Federal Circuit affirming on appeal.
  • Daniel F. Klodowski

    • Role: Lead Counsel
    • Firm: Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner, LLP
    • Office Location: Washington, D.C.
    • Relevant Experience: Daniel Klodowski's practice focuses on post-grant proceedings before the PTAB, litigating patents in district court and at the ITC, and prosecuting patent applications in mechanical and electrical technologies. He has appeared in dozens of PTAB proceedings and maintains an active litigation practice in district courts and before the Federal Circuit. Klodowski also represented Travelers Indemnity Company as counsel in IPRs which led to the cancellation of challenged claims, subsequently affirmed by the Federal Circuit.

Defendant representatives

Counsel of record for the defendant(s): attorneys, firms, and roles (lead counsel, of counsel, local counsel).

The counsel of record representing the defendant, Intellectual Ventures I LLC, in Travelers Indemnity Co. v. Intellectual Ventures I LLC, Case No. 1:26-cv-00397 (D. Del.), have not been explicitly identified in publicly available web search results for this specific case as of today's date, May 30, 2026. The initial filings for new cases often do not immediately populate detailed counsel information in easily searchable public databases outside of PACER. Since direct PACER access is not available through this platform, and no legal news outlets have specifically reported on the counsel appearances for this recently filed case, the full list of attorneys for Intellectual Ventures I LLC in this matter remains unconfirmed.

However, based on Intellectual Ventures I LLC's historical litigation patterns and common practices in the District of Delaware for patent cases, it is highly probable that their counsel would include both lead counsel from a national patent litigation firm and local counsel from a Delaware-based firm.

In-House Counsel (Potential involvement, but generally not lead trial counsel):

  • Janet Smith (General Counsel, Intellectual Ventures I LLC, Bellevue, WA)
    • Note: Janet Smith has served as General Counsel for Intellectual Ventures since at least 2017, overseeing corporate affairs and IP transactions.
  • Michelle Macartney (Director, IP Attorney, Intellectual Ventures I LLC, Bellevue, WA)
    • Note: Michelle Macartney is an IP attorney at Intellectual Ventures with experience across patent acquisitions, prosecution, licensing, and divestitures.

Likely Delaware Local Counsel (Based on common practice and known Delaware firms for IP litigation):

While specific local counsel for this case cannot be confirmed without docket access, firms such as Richards, Layton & Finger, Potter Anderson & Corroon LLP, Heyman Enerio Gattuso & Hirzel LLP, and The Pure.Law Firm are frequently engaged as Delaware local counsel in intellectual property disputes in the District of Delaware. Delaware local counsel typically handles administrative actions, court filings, and may assist with in-court appearances.

Given the absence of specific docket entries or legal news reports detailing the appearance of counsel for Intellectual Ventures I LLC in this particular case, a definitive list of lead and local counsel, including their specific roles and experience in this matter, cannot be provided at this time.