Litigation

SAS Institute Inc. v. Andrei Iancu, Director, USPTO et al.

reversed and remanded

16-969

Auto-generating section 1 of 4: Case overview & background…

Each section takes ~30-60s with web-search grounding. Keep this tab open — sections will fill in below as they complete.

Filed
2017-01-31
Terminated
2018-05-29

Patents at issue (1)

7110936

Plaintiffs (1)

Summary

SAS sought Supreme Court review of the PTAB's partial institution practice arising from IPR2013-00226 on the '936 patent. The Court reversed and remanded, holding the PTAB must decide patentability of all claims challenged by the petitioner.

Case overview & background

Plain-language overview of the case: parties, accused product, patents at issue, and why the suit matters.

Not yet generated. Click Generate to run the LLM with web-search grounding (~30-60s).

Key legal developments & outcome

Major rulings, motions, claim construction, settlements, and the present posture or final disposition.

Not yet generated. Click Generate to run the LLM with web-search grounding (~30-60s).

Plaintiff representatives

Counsel of record for the plaintiff(s): attorneys, firms, and roles (lead counsel, of counsel, local counsel).

Not yet generated. Click Generate to run the LLM with web-search grounding (~30-60s).

Defendant representatives

Counsel of record for the defendant(s): attorneys, firms, and roles (lead counsel, of counsel, local counsel).

Not yet generated. Click Generate to run the LLM with web-search grounding (~30-60s).