Litigation
Prism Technologies LLC v. T-Mobile USA, Inc.
judgment; claims held ineligible8:12-cv-00124-LES-TDT
Auto-generating section 1 of 5: Case overview & background…
Each section takes ~30-60s with web-search grounding. Keep this tab open — sections will fill in below as they complete.
Patents at issue (3)
Plaintiffs (1)
Defendants (1)
Summary
Prism withdrew the '288 claims in March 2014. The jury found non-infringement of the asserted '345 and '155 claims; post-trial motions were denied in 2016. The Federal Circuit reversed the district court's § 101 eligibility ruling and held the claims ineligible, and Prism's appeal was dismissed as moot.
Case overview & background
Plain-language overview of the case: parties, accused product, patents at issue, and why the suit matters.
Not yet generated. Click Generate to run the LLM with web-search grounding (~30-60s).
Key legal developments & outcome
Major rulings, motions, claim construction, settlements, and the present posture or final disposition.
Not yet generated. Click Generate to run the LLM with web-search grounding (~30-60s).
In the news
What the press has reported about this case, summarized with links to the source articles.
Not yet generated. Click Generate to run the LLM with web-search grounding (~30-60s).
Plaintiff representatives
Counsel of record for the plaintiff(s): attorneys, firms, and roles (lead counsel, of counsel, local counsel).
Not yet generated. Click Generate to run the LLM with web-search grounding (~30-60s).
Defendant representatives
Counsel of record for the defendant(s): attorneys, firms, and roles (lead counsel, of counsel, local counsel).
Not yet generated. Click Generate to run the LLM with web-search grounding (~30-60s).