Litigation
PPC Broadband, Inc. v. Corning Optical Communications RF, LLC
affirmed in part; vacated and remanded as to '353 claims 7-272015-1361, 2015-1364, 2015-1366, 2015-1368, 2015-1369
Auto-generating section 1 of 4: Case overview & background…
Each section takes ~30-60s with web-search grounding. Keep this tab open — sections will fill in below as they complete.
Patents at issue (1)
Plaintiffs (1)
Defendants (1)
Summary
Consolidated Federal Circuit appeals from the Corning IPRs. The court affirmed unpatentability of claims lacking the 'maintain electrical continuity' limitation but vacated the Board's determination that claims 7-27 of the '353 patent were unpatentable, remanding because the Board had not found that Matthews+Tatsuzuki maintain continuity during the claimed positions/modes.
Case overview & background
Plain-language overview of the case: parties, accused product, patents at issue, and why the suit matters.
Not yet generated. Click Generate to run the LLM with web-search grounding (~30-60s).
Key legal developments & outcome
Major rulings, motions, claim construction, settlements, and the present posture or final disposition.
Not yet generated. Click Generate to run the LLM with web-search grounding (~30-60s).
Plaintiff representatives
Counsel of record for the plaintiff(s): attorneys, firms, and roles (lead counsel, of counsel, local counsel).
Not yet generated. Click Generate to run the LLM with web-search grounding (~30-60s).
Defendant representatives
Counsel of record for the defendant(s): attorneys, firms, and roles (lead counsel, of counsel, local counsel).
Not yet generated. Click Generate to run the LLM with web-search grounding (~30-60s).