Litigation

Honeyman Cipher Solutions LLC v. Asana, Inc.

dismissed without prejudice

3:20-cv-00928

Court: United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas
Terminated: 2020-06-29

Patents at issue (1)

Plaintiffs (1)

π Honeyman Cipher Solutions LLC

Defendants (1)

Δ Asana, Inc.

Summary

Honeyman Cipher Solutions LLC sued Asana, Inc. The case was dismissed without prejudice on plaintiff's notice of voluntary dismissal on June 29, 2020.

Case overview & background

Plain-language overview of the case: parties, accused product, patents at issue, and why the suit matters.

Log in to generate analysis

Not yet generated. Click Generate to run the LLM with web-search grounding (~30-60s).

Key legal developments & outcome

Major rulings, motions, claim construction, settlements, and the present posture or final disposition.

Log in to generate analysis

Not yet generated. Click Generate to run the LLM with web-search grounding (~30-60s).

Plaintiff representatives

Counsel of record for the plaintiff(s): attorneys, firms, and roles (lead counsel, of counsel, local counsel).

Log in to generate analysis

Not yet generated. Click Generate to run the LLM with web-search grounding (~30-60s).

Defendant representatives

Counsel of record for the defendant(s): attorneys, firms, and roles (lead counsel, of counsel, local counsel).

Log in to generate analysis

Not yet generated. Click Generate to run the LLM with web-search grounding (~30-60s).

Record id: 5991399-3-20-cv-00928 · edit in Admin

Further reading

The first 30 days after a patent infringement complaint
Most defendants spend the first 30 days reacting. The defendants who do well spend it sequencing — because every move you make in month one shapes the budget, leverage, and exit options for the next two years.
How to respond to a patent troll demand letter
Trolls don't write demand letters expecting a fight. The right response makes you the wrong target.
What patent litigation actually costs (AIPLA Economic Survey)
It costs a few hundred dollars to file a patent complaint and a median of $1.5M-$3.2M to defend one through trial. That gap isn't a side effect of patent litigation — for a troll, it is the entire business model.
KSR International v. Teleflex (2007)
Pre-KSR, an obviousness rejection required explicit teaching, suggestion, or motivation in the prior art. Post-KSR, common sense, design needs, and predictable variations all do the work — and most patents don't survive.
§ 285 attorney-fee shifting in practice
§ 285 isn't a guaranteed remedy. It's a high-effort, high-evidence tool that pays off occasionally and dramatically — turning a $3M defense expense into a $3M plaintiff bill.

All resources →