Google LLC v. Accusearch Technologies LLC

Google LLC, a global technology conglomerate, is the petitioner in this Inter Partes Review (IPR). The company is widely known for its extensive range of internet-related services and products, including its dominant search engine, online advertising technologies, cloud computing, software, and hardware. The respondent, Accusearch Technologies LLC, operates as a public records research and private investigation agency, specializing in Arizona and Nevada. However, in the context of patent litigation, Accusearch Technologies LLC appears to function as an Intellectual Property assertion entity (also known as a Patent Assertion Entity or Non-Practicing Entity), having filed its first litigation against Google concerning "Google Search Engine Products and Services" in the District of Delaware.

This IPR, IPR2026-00286, was filed on March 6, 2026, at the Patent Trial and Appeal Board (PTAB) and is currently pending. It concerns US Patent 10585999, which falls under Technology Center 2100, generally encompassing Computer Architecture, Software, and Information Security. While the specific Google product, service, or technology accused of infringement in the underlying district court litigation that prompted this IPR is not explicitly detailed in the immediately available IPR records, AccuSearch Technologies LLC's prior litigation against Google accused "Google Search Engine Products and Services" such as the Google website, Chrome browser, and related legacy products for allegedly providing annotated Internet search results suitable for display on computing devices. This suggests the challenged patent likely pertains to aspects of Google's search and display functionalities. A one-line technical sketch of US Patent 10585959, based on its classification within Computer Architecture, Software, and Information Security, would generally relate to methods or systems for processing and presenting information, potentially in a search-related context. (A more specific technical sketch would require direct access to the patent's claims and specification, which are not provided in the search results).

The procedural posture of this case is an Inter Partes Review before the PTAB, a specialized tribunal within the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) that reviews the patentability of issued patent claims. The IPR was filed by Google, often a petitioner in such proceedings to challenge the validity of patents asserted against it in parallel district court litigations. The PTAB serves as a critical venue for challenging patent validity based on prior art, and its decisions can significantly impact the trajectory of related infringement lawsuits. The case is notable due to Accusearch Technologies LLC's apparent role as a Patent Assertion Entity, initiating litigation against a major technology company like Google, and Google's common strategy of employing IPRs to challenge asserted patents, aiming to invalidate them and thus mitigate infringement liability.The case, Google LLC v. Accusearch Technologies LLC, IPR2026-00286, is an Inter Partes Review (IPR) filed at the Patent Trial and Appeal Board (PTAB). Google LLC, the petitioner, is a multinational technology corporation renowned for its extensive internet-related services and products, including its search engine, online advertising, cloud computing, and various software and hardware offerings. Accusearch Technologies LLC, the patent owner, primarily operates as a public records research and private investigation agency in Arizona and Nevada. However, in the context of patent litigation, Accusearch Technologies LLC has acted as a Patent Assertion Entity (PAE), having previously filed its initial litigation against Google concerning "Google Search Engine Products and Services".

The specific patent at issue in this IPR is US Patent 10585959. While a detailed technical sketch of the patent is not directly available in the search results, its classification within Technology Center 2100 (Computer Architecture, Software, and Information Security) suggests it generally pertains to methods or systems for information processing and presentation. In Accusearch's prior litigation against Google, the accused products and services included "Google Search Engine Products and Services" like the Google website and Chrome browser, specifically targeting features related to "providing annotated Internet search results suitable for display to a user on a computing device". Therefore, the accused technology in this IPR likely relates to Google's search and information display functionalities.

This IPR was filed on March 6, 2026, and is currently pending before the PTAB. The PTAB is an administrative tribunal within the USPTO responsible for reviewing the patentability of issued claims, particularly through trial proceedings like IPRs. The choice of the PTAB as a venue is significant because IPRs provide an efficient mechanism for challenging patent validity based on prior art, often running in parallel with district court infringement actions. This case is notable due to the involvement of Accusearch as a PAE asserting patents against a major operating company like Google, and Google's consistent strategy of utilizing IPRs to challenge the validity of patents that are asserted against its products, aiming to neutralize potential infringement claims.

Parallel IPR Proceeding Filed Against Accusearch Technologies' Patent Amidst Delaware Litigation

Washington, D.C. – May 29, 2026 – Google LLC has initiated an Inter Partes Review (IPR) proceeding, IPR2026-00286, against Accusearch Technologies LLC, challenging the validity of US Patent 10585959. The petition was filed with the Patent Trial and Appeal Board (PTAB) on March 6, 2026, and is currently pending an institution decision. This IPR follows a patent infringement lawsuit filed by Accusearch Technologies LLC against Alphabet (Google) in the District of Delaware on April 29, 2025 (Case No. 1:25-cv-00514).

Key Legal Developments:

District Court Litigation (Accusearch Technologies LLC v. Google LLC, D. Del. 1:25-cv-00514)

• Filing of Complaint (2025-04-29): Accusearch Technologies LLC filed its first patent infringement lawsuit, accusing Alphabet (Google) of infringing four patents related to "annotated Internet search results" through "Google Search Engine Products and Services," including the Google website and Chrome browser. While the specific list of all four asserted patents was not immediately available, it is highly probable that US Patent 10585959, the subject of Google's IPR, is among them.
• Initial Pleadings: Details on Google's answer or any counterclaims in the Delaware district court case are not yet publicly detailed in the available search results.
• Pre-trial Motions: As of May 29, 2026, there are no public records indicating that Google has filed a motion to stay the district court litigation pending the outcome of the IPR.

PTAB Inter Partes Review (Google LLC v. Accusearch Technologies LLC, IPR2026-00286)

• Petition Filing (2026-03-06): Google LLC filed the IPR petition challenging US Patent 10585959.
• Status: Pending Institution Decision: The case is currently in the pre-institution phase. The PTAB typically issues a decision on whether to institute an IPR approximately six months after the petition filing date. Therefore, an institution decision for IPR2026-00286 is not expected until around September 2026.
• Filings: An Exhibit 2012 was filed in the IPR on May 13, 2026.

Outcome:

Both the district court litigation and the parallel IPR proceeding are in their early stages. The district court case is proceeding, and the PTAB has yet to decide whether to institute the IPR. No claim construction, discovery milestones, trial events, or final dispositions have occurred for either case at this time. The ultimate outcome of the IPR, once an institution decision is made and a final written decision is potentially issued, could significantly impact the ongoing district court infringement litigation. Recent changes in PTAB policy, including the USPTO Director's increased involvement in institution decisions and new considerations for discretionary denials related to U.S. manufacturing activity and "settled expectations," may influence the IPR landscape.

tool_code
print(google_search.search(queries=["IPR2026-00286 Google LLC v. Accusearch Technologies LLC counsel", "Google LLC IPR counsel for patent 10585959", "Scott A. Herbst Foley & Lardner LLP", "Michael J. T. Burger Ropes & Gray LLP", "Google LLC in-house counsel patent litigation", "IPR2026-00286 docket", "Google LLC patent litigation counsel IPR"]))
thought
The user is asking for the counsel of record for the plaintiff(s) (Google LLC) in IPR2026-00286. I need to find the names, roles, firms, office locations, and relevant experience for each attorney. I will use web search, focusing on PTAB dockets, firm websites, and legal news sites.

Here's my plan:

1. Search for "IPR2026-00286 Google LLC v. Accusearch Technologies LLC counsel" to find general counsel information.
2. Look for the docket specifically for IPR2026-00286 to identify the attorneys who have entered an appearance.
3. For each identified attorney, search their name and firm to determine their role (e.g., lead counsel, of counsel), office location, and relevant experience.
4. Also, try to identify any in-house counsel for Google who might be involved.Based on available information and Google's known history of engaging prominent intellectual property counsel for Inter Partes Reviews (IPRs), the counsel of record representing Google LLC (Petitioner) in IPR2026-00286 is highly likely to include attorneys from Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner, LLP. While specific attorney names for IPR2026-00286 are not publicly accessible without a direct docket login, Erika Harmon Arner of Finnegan has a well-established track record of representing Google as a petitioner in numerous IPRs.

Likely Lead Counsel for Google LLC:

• Erika Harmon Arner
  • Role: Partner, likely Lead Counsel.
  • Firm: Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner, LLP (Finnegan), Washington, D.C. office.
  • Experience Note: Erika Harmon Arner is a nationally recognized leader in trial practice before the Patent Trial and Appeal Board (PTAB) and related appeals to the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit. She consistently ranks as one of the top female attorneys appearing in PTAB trials and has served as lead counsel for Google in many IPRs, including successfully canceling challenged claims and securing affirmance at the Federal Circuit. She also co-edits The Practitioners Guide to Trials Before the Patent Trial and Appeal Board.

It is common for large corporations like Google to engage multiple attorneys and firms for complex IP matters. Firms such as Ropes & Gray LLP are also frequently retained by Google for patent litigation and PTAB proceedings, given their strong intellectual property litigation group. While no specific attorneys from Ropes & Gray have been confirmed for this particular IPR (IPR2026-00286) at this time without direct docket access, they are a firm Google regularly partners with for such challenges.

In-House Counsel (General Role):
Google LLC also employs a robust team of in-house corporate counsel specializing in intellectual property litigation who work in conjunction with outside counsel to manage and execute litigation strategy. Halimah DeLaine Prado serves as Google's General Counsel, overseeing the company's legal affairs. However, specific in-house counsel serving as attorneys of record for a particular IPR are typically identified on the official docket filings, which are not fully accessible in the provided search results.

Note on Sourcing: The specific attorney details for IPR2026-00286 are not directly available through open web searches of PTAB documents or legal news sites like Patexia without a login. The information regarding Erika Harmon Arner and Finnegan is based on her documented and extensive history of representing Google in IPR proceedings.

Accusearch Technologies LLC, the patent owner in IPR2026-00286, is represented by counsel in the related district court case, Accusearch Technologies LLC v. Alphabet (Google) (1:25-cv-00514) in the District of Delaware.

Based on available information for the underlying district court case, the following attorneys have appeared for Accusearch Technologies LLC:

• Andrew Colin Mayo
  • Role: Counsel
  • Firm: Ashby & Geddes, Wilmington, DE
  • Note: Ashby & Geddes is a Delaware-based law firm frequently acting as local counsel in intellectual property and complex commercial litigation in the District of Delaware.
• Brian A. Biggs
  • Role: Counsel
  • Firm: Ashby & Geddes, Wilmington, DE
  • Note: Also with Ashby & Geddes, likely serving as local counsel in the Delaware district court case.
• Chandran B. Iyer
  • Role: Counsel
  • Firm: (Not explicitly stated in available snippets, but often lead counsel for patent assertion entities)
  • Note: Information on specific firm and experience not detailed in snippets.
• Lisa Phillips
  • Role: Counsel
  • Firm: (Not explicitly stated in available snippets)
  • Note: Information on specific firm and experience not detailed in snippets.

It's important to note that while these attorneys are listed as counsel in the district court litigation, specific appearances for the IPR (IPR2026-00286) at the PTAB would be recorded on the PTAB's Public Access to Proceedings (PAPE) system docket. As of today's date, the full details of counsel appearing for Accusearch Technologies LLC in the IPR are not readily available in public search results.

Robert Osann Jr., the sole inventor of the patent at issue (US 10585959), previously assigned the patent to Accusearch Technologies LLC. He has extensive experience in IP consulting, including patent searching, application drafting, and expert witness services in patent litigation, where he has acted as an expert witness for patent validity. However, his role in the current IPR is likely as the inventor and potentially an expert, rather than as legal counsel.