Litigation
Eliyahou Harari et al. v. Shane C. Hollmer et al.
judgment; reversed/remanded on appeal105,606
Auto-generating section 1 of 4: Case overview & background…
Each section takes ~30-60s with web-search grounding. Keep this tab open — sections will fill in below as they complete.
Patents at issue (1)
Plaintiffs (2)
Defendants (2)
Summary
USPTO patent interference (Interference No. 105,606) involving U.S. Patent 5,828,601, between Eliyahou Harari & Sanjay Mehrotra (junior party, application 09/310,880) and Shane C. Hollmer & Lee E. Cleveland (senior party). The BPAI entered judgment against Hollmer and held Harari's '880 application entitled to the benefit of the April 13, 1989 filing date of application 07/337,566; the decision was later addressed in Federal Circuit appeals.
Case overview & background
Plain-language overview of the case: parties, accused product, patents at issue, and why the suit matters.
Not yet generated. Click Generate to run the LLM with web-search grounding (~30-60s).
Key legal developments & outcome
Major rulings, motions, claim construction, settlements, and the present posture or final disposition.
Not yet generated. Click Generate to run the LLM with web-search grounding (~30-60s).
Plaintiff representatives
Counsel of record for the plaintiff(s): attorneys, firms, and roles (lead counsel, of counsel, local counsel).
Not yet generated. Click Generate to run the LLM with web-search grounding (~30-60s).
Defendant representatives
Counsel of record for the defendant(s): attorneys, firms, and roles (lead counsel, of counsel, local counsel).
Not yet generated. Click Generate to run the LLM with web-search grounding (~30-60s).