Plaintiff

Rembrandt Wireless Technologies, LP

4 cases as plaintiff.

Cases
4
Active
0
4 closed
Filed
2013–2019
Top venue
C.D. California Southern
2 cases

Watchlist

Get alerted when Rembrandt Wireless Technologies, LP sues again.

Email-only, free, anonymous. We'll notify you when Rembrandt Wireless Technologies, LP files another patent-infringement lawsuit. One-click unsubscribe from any alert.

Filing activity

2013: 1 case'13'14'15'16'17'182019: 3 cases3'19
Cases filed per year with Rembrandt Wireless Technologies, LP as plaintiff.

Rembrandt Wireless Technologies, LP v. Qualcomm Inc.

dismissed
Docket:
8:19-cv-00705
Filed:
2019-04-15
Terminated:
2021-02-05

Rembrandt asserted U.S. 8,457,228 and U.S. 8,023,580 against Qualcomm over chip-level Bluetooth EDR functionality. Qualcomm counterclaimed and moved to stay pending IPR; after the IPRs were denied, the parties jointly moved to dismiss and the case was terminated on February 5, 2021.

Rembrandt Wireless Technologies, LP v. Broadcom Incorporated et al.

unconfirmed
Docket:
8:19-cv-00708
Filed:
2019-04-15

Rembrandt asserted U.S. 8,457,228 and U.S. 8,023,580 against Broadcom in a case noticed as related to 8:19-cv-00705. The narrative did not retrieve a primary-source docket entry confirming final disposition; the case appears to have been resolved or dismissed around the same period as related cases, but the disposition is unconfirmed.

Rembrandt Wireless Technologies, LP v. Apple Inc.

settled
Docket:
2:19-cv-00025
Filed:
2019-01-24
Terminated:
2020-03-26

Rembrandt asserted U.S. 8,457,228 and U.S. 8,023,580 against Apple, accusing products implementing Bluetooth Enhanced Data Rate. Apple's transfer and stay motions were denied, and after its mandamus petition the parties settled and the action was dismissed with prejudice on March 26, 2020.

Rembrandt Wireless Technologies, LP v. Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. et al.

settled
Docket:
2:13-cv-00213
Filed:
2013-03-15

Rembrandt asserted U.S. 8,457,228 and U.S. 8,023,580 against Samsung entities and BlackBerry entities. A 2015 jury verdict found infringement and awarded $15.7M; the Federal Circuit affirmed claim construction and denial of JMOL but vacated and remanded on marking-based damages. The E.D. Tex. action was dismissed with prejudice in August 2019 after settlement.