Defendant

Samsung Austin Semiconductor, L.L.C.

1 case as defendant.

Cases
1
Active
0
1 closed
Filed
2013
Top venue
E.D. Texas Marshall
1 case

Company profile

I'll research this company before writing the profile.

Samsung Austin Semiconductor, L.L.C. (SAS) — Headquarters: 12100 Samsung Blvd., Austin, Texas. Founded/established 1996–1997 as Samsung Electronics' U.S. manufacturing arm; the entity is a wholly owned subsidiary of Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. (Korea, KRX: 005930), not separately publicly traded. SAS reports more than 5,000 employees across its Austin campus and the newer Taylor, Texas site; Austin alone was cited at roughly 3,000 employees with over $18 billion invested since 1996. (Sources: Samsung newsroom; Austin/Travis County filings; Crunchbase.)

Operations. SAS operates semiconductor fabrication, not a patent portfolio. Its Austin campus (two fabs, ~2.3–2.76 million sq. ft., ~300–600 acres) runs foundry and memory production — historically DRAM, SRAM and flash, and more recently logic/foundry work spanning 65nm to 14nm FinFET, with digital large-scale integration (LSI) components for mobile, graphics, networking/HPC, IoT, RF and automotive customers. Samsung is building a separate multibillion-dollar fab campus in Taylor, Texas (initially reported around $17 billion; later press cites ~$170 billion program-level figures across the broader U.S. investment), where production is targeted for late 2026. SAS is therefore an operating manufacturer, not an NPE.

Litigation posture. Purely a defendant: 0 plaintiff cases, 1 defendant case in the tracked data. That profile is consistent with an operating company being attacked, not asserting patents. The single tracked matter is Rembrandt Wireless Technologies, LP v. Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. et al., filed 2013-03-15 in the Eastern District of Texas, Marshall Division — a plaintiff-friendly venue. Samsung Austin Semiconductor appears alongside Samsung Electronics and affiliated defendants, with the accused products being Bluetooth-enabled phones, tablets and televisions rather than SAS's own manufacturing output.

Context. Rembrandt Wireless Technologies is widely characterized as a patent assertion entity (Wired described it as a "patent troll"; RPX tracks it as an NPE); it asserted Bluetooth Enhanced Data Rate modulation patents traced to inventor Gordon Bremer. A 2015 Marshall jury found infringement and awarded $15.7 million, later reduced to about $11.1 million on remand, with extensive parallel IPR activity. SAS's involvement reflects its role as a U.S. manufacturing affiliate of the Samsung Electronics defendant group.

Rembrandt Wireless Technologies, LP v. Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. et al.

settled
Docket:
2:13-cv-00213
Filed:
2013-03-15

Rembrandt asserted U.S. 8,457,228 and U.S. 8,023,580 against Samsung entities and BlackBerry entities. A 2015 jury verdict found infringement and awarded $15.7M; the Federal Circuit affirmed claim construction and denial of JMOL but vacated and remanded on marking-based damages. The E.D. Tex. action was dismissed with prejudice in August 2019 after settlement.