Plaintiff

Raytheon Company

3 cases as plaintiff.

Cases
3
Active
0
3 closed
Filed
2015–2017
Top venue
E.D. Texas Marshall
2 cases
Also appears as a defendant in 2 cases → View as defendant

Watchlist

Get alerted when Raytheon Company sues again.

Email-only, free, anonymous. We'll notify you when Raytheon Company files another patent-infringement lawsuit. One-click unsubscribe from any alert.

Filing activity

2015: 2 cases2'15'162017: 1 case'17
Cases filed per year with Raytheon Company as plaintiff.

Raytheon Company v. Sony Corporation et al.

affirmed
Docket:
2017-1554, 2017-1556, 2017-1557
Filed:
2017-02-01
Terminated:
2018-04-02
Patents:5591678
π Raytheon CompanyΔ Sony CorporationΔ Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd.Δ Samsung Electronics America, Inc.Δ Samsung Semiconductor, Inc.

Raytheon appealed from the PTAB IPR final decisions concerning the ’678 patent. The Federal Circuit affirmed the Board’s obviousness holdings in a nonprecedential decision issued April 2, 2018.

Raytheon Company v. Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. et al.

dismissed
Docket:
2:15-cv-00341
Filed:
2015-03-06
Terminated:
2018-06-08
Patents:5591678
π Raytheon CompanyΔ Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd.Δ Samsung Electronics America, Inc.Δ Samsung Semiconductor, Inc.Δ Samsung Telecommunications America LLC

Raytheon asserted the ’678 patent under 35 U.S.C. § 271(g) against Samsung entities over back-illuminated CMOS image sensors. The case was stayed pending co-pending IPRs, and after the patent claims were cancelled the parties’ joint motion to dismiss was granted on June 8, 2018.

Raytheon Company v. Sony Kabushiki Kaisha et al.

dismissed
Docket:
2:15-cv-00342
Filed:
2015-03-06
Patents:5591678
π Raytheon CompanyΔ Sony Kabushiki KaishaΔ Sony Corporation of AmericaΔ Sony Semiconductor CorporationΔ Sony EMCS CorporationΔ Sony Electronics, Inc.Δ Sony Mobile Communications (USA), Inc.Δ Sony Mobile Communications AB/Inc.Δ Apple, Inc.Δ OmniVision Technologies, Inc.

Raytheon asserted the ’678 patent under 35 U.S.C. § 271(g) against Sony entities, Apple, and OmniVision. The case was stayed pending the IPRs and ultimately dismissed in the same 2018 joint-dismissal episode as the companion Samsung case.