Plaintiff

Protiva Biotherapeutics, Inc.

1 case as plaintiff.

Cases
1
Active
0
1 closed
Filed
2019
Top venue
Fed. Cir.
1 case
Also appears as a defendant in 1 case → View as defendant

Company profile

Protiva Biotherapeutics, Inc. is a British Columbia corporation founded in September 2000 (spun out of Inex Pharmaceuticals) and originally based in Burnaby, B.C., Canada. It was acquired by Tekmira Pharmaceuticals Corporation in a business combination completed May 30, 2008, becoming a wholly owned subsidiary; Tekmira renamed itself Arbutus Biopharma Corporation (Nasdaq: ABUS) in July 2015, and Protiva was amalgamated into Arbutus effective January 1, 2018. Protiva therefore has no independent operations today and persists primarily as a named patent-holding entity within Arbutus. Arbutus is a clinical-stage infectious-disease biopharma (Warminster, PA) with roughly 19 employees and about $6.2M revenue in FY2024 following 2024–25 restructuring (Arbutus 10-K/press releases; MarketWatch).

Operations. Protiva developed stable nucleic acid-lipid particle (SNALP) technology — lipid nanoparticle (LNP) formulations for delivering siRNA and other nucleic acids in vivo. Its programs included ApoB SNALP for hypercholesterolemia and siRNA candidates against hepatitis B and Ebola (the latter with UTMB). The LNP platform originating at Protiva later supported Alnylam's patisiran (Onpattro) and is the technology asserted in mRNA-vaccine litigation.

Litigation posture. Protiva is not a classic NPE; it is a legacy subsidiary/IP holder appearing in LNP patent disputes as patent owner, consistent with its two tracked cases (one plaintiff-side, one defendant-side). The Federal Circuit case Protiva Biotherapeutics, Inc. et al. v. Moderna Therapeutics, Inc. et al. (2019-11-27) arose from the PTAB review of U.S. Patent 9,364,435, with Protiva as cross-appellant; the PTAB case Moderna Therapeutics, Inc. v. Arbutus Biopharma Corp. et al. (2018-02-21) is Moderna's IPR petition against Arbutus/Protiva. Its LNP patents are exclusively licensed to Genevant Sciences (a Roivant subsidiary), which co-asserts them with Arbutus.

Context. The Moderna dispute led to Arbutus/Genevant's 2022 Delaware suit and a March 2026 global settlement with Moderna worth up to $2.25 billion (Arbutus/Roivant press releases; Reuters). Arbutus/Genevant continue LNP litigation against Pfizer/BioNTech. Venues are D. Del. and D.N.J., not the Eastern District of Texas.

Keep this research.

Save to your free workspace, then choose whether to receive updates.

Protiva Biotherapeutics, Inc. et al. v. Moderna Therapeutics, Inc. et al.

affirmed; concluded
Docket:
2020-1183
Filed:
2019-11-27
Terminated:
2023-04-11
Patents:9404127

Appeal from IPR2018-00680. The Federal Circuit affirmed the PTAB's final written decision holding all claims of US 9,404,127 unpatentable as inherently anticipated, resulting in cancellation of the '127 claims.