Plaintiff

MiTAC International Corp.

1 case as plaintiff.

Cases
1
Active
0
1 closed
Filed
—
Top venue
Fed. Cir.
1 case
Also appears as a defendant in 1 case → View as defendant

Company profile

MiTAC International Corp. (神達電腦股份有限公司) was a Taiwanese electronics manufacturer founded 8 December 1982 in Hsinchu Science Park, headquartered later in Taoyuan, Taiwan. It listed on the Taiwan Stock Exchange in 1990 (TWSE: 2315) and formed part of the MiTAC-Synnex Group. In September 2013 a 100% share swap reorganized it into MiTAC Holdings Corporation (TWSE: 3706), the listed parent today; MiTAC International was delisted. Group headcount has been reported in the ~7,200–7,800 range (per MiTAC investor materials and 2011 sustainability report). GlobalData estimated MiTAC Holdings revenue at roughly US$1.9B for 2023 and market cap near US$3.4B.

Operations. MiTAC is an operating design-and-manufacturing group, not a patent holder without products. It provides ODM/JDM/OEM/EMS services for servers, workstations, storage and cloud/datacenter equipment (sold under the MiTAC and TYAN brands, later under MiTAC Computing Technology Corp.), and consumer and automotive electronics under the Mio, Magellan and Navman brands — portable and outdoor GPS navigation devices, dash cams, smartwatches and in-vehicle infotainment. Manufacturing is in Taiwan, mainland China (Shunde, Kunshan) and Vietnam.

Litigation posture. MiTAC is an operating company defending, not an NPE or a serial plaintiff. Both tracked matters arise from one dispute. Global Locate, Inc. (acquired by Broadcom in 2007) filed ITC Investigation No. 337-TA-602, Certain GPS Devices and Products Containing Same, naming MiTAC as a respondent alongside SiRF, Mio, E-TEN and Pharos. MiTAC's single "plaintiff" appearance is as a co-appellant with SiRF in the resulting Federal Circuit appeal — not a patent assertion. Neither case is in a district-court patent venue such as the Eastern District of Texas.

Notable context. The Commission found a Section 337 violation and issued a limited exclusion order covering GPS chips and devices made or imported by SiRF, MiTAC and Mio, followed by a 2010 enforcement proceeding. The Federal Circuit affirmed in SiRF Technology, Inc. v. Int'l Trade Comm'n, 601 F.3d 1319 (Fed. Cir. 2010), addressing assisted-GPS patents, standing, patentable subject matter under Bilski, and divided infringement. Technology focus: assisted-GPS signal processing and satellite ephemeris distribution.

Keep this research.

Save to your free workspace, then choose whether to receive updates.

SiRF Technology, Inc. et al. v. International Trade Commission

affirmed
Docket:
2009-1262
Terminated:
2010-04-12

Federal Circuit appeal by SiRF and other respondents from the ITC's final determination in 337-TA-602, with Broadcom as intervenor. The court affirmed in all respects, upholding standing, infringement, and patent-eligibility of method claims of the '801 and '187 patents; '801 was held valid, enforceable, and infringed.