Plaintiff

InternetAd Systems, LLC

5 cases as plaintiff.

Cases
5
Active
0
5 closed
Filed
2003–2006
Top venue
N.D. Texas Dallas
2 cases

Watchlist

Get alerted when InternetAd Systems, LLC sues again.

Email-only, free, anonymous. We'll notify you when InternetAd Systems, LLC files another patent-infringement lawsuit. One-click unsubscribe from any alert.

InternetAd Systems, LLC v. Turner Broadcasting System, Inc. et al.

unknown
Docket:
3:06-cv-01063
Filed:
2006-06-15
Patents:6185586

InternetAd Systems filed suit against Turner Broadcasting System and several other defendants in the Northern District of Texas. The case was listed in an Acacia Research Form 10-Q under 'User Activated Internet Advertising Technology,' but no confirmed disposition was reported.

InternetAd Systems, LLC v. ESPN, Inc. et al.

unknown
Docket:
3:03-cv-2787-D
Filed:
2003-11-18

InternetAd Systems, LLC sued ESPN, Inc., The New York Times Company, and Travelocity.com, Inc. in the Northern District of Texas. The asserted patents were 5,572,643, 5,737,619, 6,185,586, and 6,457,025; plaintiff sought injunctive relief and damages. A defense-side discovery order issued Oct. 8, 2004, and final disposition was not verified.

InternetAd Systems, LLC v. Opodo Limited et al.

unknown
Docket:
3:06-cv-1084-P
Patents:5572643

InternetAd Systems, LLC sued Opodo Limited, Amadeus entities, OpenTable, Inc., and Best Western International, Inc. in the Northern District of Texas. The court denied defendants' summary judgment motion on standing, holding InternetAd was an exclusive licensee with all substantial rights; OpenTable was dismissed with prejudice by stipulation. The '643 patent was a patent-in-suit, and later disposition was not verified.

InternetAd Systems, LLC v. Priceline.com Inc.

settled
Patents:6185586

InternetAd Systems sued Priceline.com in Texas before August 2005. The parties reached a licensing agreement settling the suit, reported August 15, 2005; the license covered InternetAd's interstitial Internet advertising portfolio, which would include the '586 patent, but the source did not enumerate the patents-in-suit.