Plaintiff

Foras Technologies, Ltd.

1 case as plaintiff.

Also appears as a defendant in 1 case View as defendant

Company profile

Foras Technologies, Ltd. is an Irish patent assertion entity (NPE) associated with Dublin-based monetization firm Atlantic IP Services Limited. The company does not develop or sell any products or services.

Instead, Foras Technologies, Ltd. focuses on asserting a portfolio of patents related to lockstep processor architectures, which are used for fault-tolerance and firmware recovery in embedded automotive systems. This technology is relevant to automotive ECU and Advanced Driver-Assistance Systems (ADAS) platforms.

Foras Technologies, Ltd. has an active patent litigation posture as an NPE. Its tracked cases include one instance as a plaintiff and one as a defendant in the Texas Western District Court, indicating a two-way litigation dynamic. This includes Foras Technologies, Ltd. v. BMW, where Foras asserted patents, and BMW et al. v. Foras Technologies, Ltd., a defensive action. Other related cases have been filed in the Eastern District of Texas and the Eastern District of Virginia.

Notable context includes BMW's active counter-litigation efforts, successfully challenging at least one of Foras's patents (U.S. Patent No. 7,502,958) as unpatentable at the Patent Trial and Appeal Board (PTAB). Another patent (U.S. Patent No. 7,627,781) was found invalid by the Central Reexamination Unit following a challenge by Unified Patents. Foras has also asserted these patents against other automotive companies such as Toyota, Denso, Nissan, and ZF Friedrichshafen, with some cases ending in dismissals.

Watchlist

Get alerted when Foras Technologies, Ltd. sues again.

Email-only, free, anonymous. We'll notify you when Foras Technologies, Ltd. files another patent-infringement lawsuit. One-click unsubscribe from any alert.

Foras Technologies, Ltd. v. BMW

Active
Docket:
6:23-cv-00386
Patents:7502958

Identified as the lead case for a consolidated action filed in 2023, with Case 6:24-cv-00371 consolidated into it, and a stay in effect likely reflecting parallel inter partes review (IPR) proceedings.