Defendant

BMW

1 case as defendant.

Also appears as a plaintiff in 1 case View as plaintiff

Company profile

Bayerische Motoren Werke Aktiengesellschaft, commonly known as BMW, is a German multinational conglomerate headquartered in Munich, Germany. Founded on March 7, 1916, BMW is a public company, trading on the FWB exchange. The company employs approximately 154,540 people globally as of December 2023.

BMW is a leading global manufacturer of luxury vehicles and motorcycles. Its product lines include automobiles under the BMW, Mini, and Rolls-Royce brands, and motorcycles under the BMW Motorrad brand. Beyond manufacturing, BMW also offers financial services, car-sharing services, and mobility solutions.

In terms of patent litigation, BMW appears to be an operating company primarily defending against infringement claims. The company has been involved in 2 tracked cases, appearing as a defendant once and as a plaintiff once. Both cases are located in the Texas Western District Court.

A notable case is Foras Technologies, Ltd. v. BMW, where BMW is the defendant in a case filed in the Texas Western District Court. BMW has also filed a case as plaintiff against Foras Technologies, Ltd. in the same jurisdiction, BMW et al. v. Foras Technologies, Ltd.. Foras Technologies, Ltd. presents itself as a strategic consulting, business development, and digital transformation company. BMW has recently secured victories in similar patent disputes, including an appeal dismissal in Onesta IP, LLC v. BMW AG at the Federal Circuit and an anti-suit injunction against Onesta IP, LLC in the Western District of Texas, which required Onesta to terminate parallel German patent infringement actions asserting US patents. These cases highlight BMW's proactive stance in defending against what it considers meritless assertions by non-practicing entities (NPEs).

Foras Technologies, Ltd. v. BMW

Active
Docket:
6:23-cv-00386
Patents:7502958

Identified as the lead case for a consolidated action filed in 2023, with Case 6:24-cv-00371 consolidated into it, and a stay in effect likely reflecting parallel inter partes review (IPR) proceedings.