9135800

5 known cases. View patent page →

Cases
5
Active
0
5 closed
Filed
2015–2016
Top venue
W D N C
1 case

Filing activity

2015: 1 case'152016: 2 cases2'16
Cases asserting US Patent 9135800 filed per year.

InVue Security Products Inc. v. Mobile Tech, Inc. d/b/a MTI

§101 motion to dismiss denied (Apr. 14, 2016)
Docket:
3:15-cv-00610
Court:
W.D.N.C.

InVue Security Products Inc. sued Mobile Tech, Inc. d/b/a MTI in the Western District of North Carolina in approximately 2015, asserting US 9,269,247; US 9,135,800; and US 8,884,762. The court denied a §101 motion to dismiss on April 14, 2016. This case does not assert US 10,738,508.

InVue Security Products Inc. v. Mobile Tech, Inc. d/b/a Mobile Technologies Inc. d/b/a MTI, formerly Merchandising Technologies Inc.

consolidated and administratively closed; consolidated action transferred to D. Or.
Docket:
3:16-cv-00553
Filed:
2016-07-19
Terminated:
2016-08-04

InVue filed this suit against Mobile Tech on July 19, 2016, the same day US 9,396,631 issued. It was consolidated into W.D.N.C. No. 3:15-cv-00610 and administratively closed; the consolidated action also asserted US 9,135,800, US 8,884,762, and US 9,269,247 and was transferred to the U.S. District Court for the District of Oregon. The '631 claims were later invalidated in PTAB IPRs and that invalidation was affirmed on appeal.

InVue Security Products Inc. v. Mobile Tech, Inc. (MTI)

status not verified
Docket:
3:17-cv-01356-SI

InVue's case against Mobile Tech in the District of Oregon, asserting the '472, '452, '110, '631, '247, '800, and '762 patents. The '800 patent is confirmed asserted, but the docket shows venue/transfer and consolidation activity and the final disposition is not verified.

Mobile Tech, Inc. v. InVue Security Products Inc.

Final Written Decision; rehearing denied
Docket:
IPR2016-00895
Filed:
2016-04-14
Terminated:
2017-10-12
Patents:9135800

PTAB inter partes review petition by Mobile Tech against InVue challenging U.S. Patent No. 9,135,800. The Board instituted review on October 13, 2016, and issued a Final Written Decision on October 12, 2017; a request for rehearing was denied on February 22, 2018.