7 known cases. View patent page →
CyboEnergy sued Aptos Solar Technology asserting US 8,786,133 and US 9,331,489 over the Aptos MAC 800R microinverter. The parties filed a stipulation of dismissal on July 11, 2022, and the court sent the patent/trademark report to the USPTO.
CyboEnergy sued Altenergy Power System USA, asserting US 8,786,133 and US 9,331,489. The court dismissed the '133 allegations with prejudice on September 13, 2023, and later construed '489 claim 14 terms according to their plain and ordinary meanings; final disposition was not confirmed.
CyboEnergy sued Hoymiles Power Electronics USA asserting US 8,786,133 and US 9,331,489. On March 20, 2024, the court granted in part and denied in part Hoymiles' motion to dismiss, allowing the '489 indirect-infringement theories to survive; later status was not confirmed.
CyboEnergy, Inc. sued Sensata, Inc. on October 15, 2021, asserting U.S. Patent 8,786,133. CyboEnergy later alleged that other defendants knew of the '133 patent from at least the Sensata filing date because Sensata used APsystems inverters. The outcome was not determined in the retrieved material.
CyboEnergy, Inc. sued Home Depot U.S.A., Inc. asserting U.S. Patents 8,786,133 and 9,331,488. CyboEnergy expressly withdrew its direct-infringement claim on the '133 patent and proceeded only on indirect infringement for that patent. The docket shows a stay and a notice of voluntary dismissal, and the case appears to have been voluntarily dismissed/stayed rather than litigated to judgment.
CyboEnergy, Inc. sued Duracell Power Center, LLC in the Northern District of California; the narrative lists it among cases asserting the '133 patent, but the specific patents and pleading details were not confirmed in the retrieved material. The case was pending as of the last docket update.
CyboEnergy, Inc. sued Deye ESS Technology USA and Ningbo Deye Inverter Technology Co., Ltd. asserting U.S. Patents 8,786,133 and 9,331,488. After an order to show cause regarding lack of prosecution, CyboEnergy filed a voluntary dismissal under FRCP 41(a)(1) on December 12, 2025, and the case was terminated.