Litigation involving US Patent 8719090

8719090

Cases

Active

2 closed

Filed

2016

Top venue

E.D. Texas Marshall

1 case

Customedia Technologies, L.L.C. v. DISH Network Corporation et al.

dismissed with prejudice in favor of DISH

Docket:: 2:16-cv-00129-JRG
Court:: U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, Marshall Division (Judge Rodney Gilstrap)
Filed:: 2016-02-10
Terminated:: 2022-08-10

Patents:7840437 8719090 9053494 8955029

π Customedia Technologies, L.L.C.Δ DISH Network Corporation Δ DISH Network L.L.C.

Customedia sued DISH for infringement of multiple patents, including the '437 patent, alleging infringement related to DISH's addressable advertising, DISH Anywhere, and Pay-Per-View/video-on-demand offerings. The '437 asserted claims were challenged and held unpatentable; after USPTO cancellation, the court dismissed the case with prejudice in DISH's favor.

Customedia Technologies, LLC v. DISH Network Corporation et al.

affirmed; rehearing denied

Docket:: 18-2239, 19-1000
Court:: U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Terminated:: 2020-06-09

Patents:8719090 9053494

π Customedia Technologies, LLC Δ DISH Network Corporation Δ DISH Network L.L.C.

Federal Circuit appeal of the CBM final written decisions for US 8,719,090 and US 9,053,494. The court affirmed the PTAB's invalidity holdings on 2020-03-06; rehearing and rehearing en banc were denied on 2020-06-09.