8073707

5 known cases. View patent page →

Cases
5
Active
0
5 closed
Filed
2012–2016
Top venue
D. Delaware
1 case

Filing activity

2012: 1 case'12'13'142015: 2 cases2'152016: 1 case'16
Cases asserting US Patent 8073707 filed per year.

BodyMedia, Inc. v. Basis Science, Inc.

terminated/settled
Docket:
1:12-cv-00133
Filed:
2012-02-02

BodyMedia, Inc. asserted U.S. Patent 6,605,038 and several related patents against Basis Science, Inc. in the District of Delaware. Basis Science answered and counterclaimed, moved to stay pending reexamination and to transfer venue to the Northern District of California, and the case terminated without a merits ruling; it was resolved privately in connection with Basis Science's acquisition by Intel.

AliphCom d/b/a Jawbone et al. v. Fitbit, Inc. et al.

terminated / no violation
Docket:
337-TA-963
Filed:
2015-07-07
Terminated:
2016-10-20

Section 337 investigation concerning activity tracking devices. The '707 patent claims 19, 23, and 24 were asserted along with U.S. Patents 8,398,546, 8,446,275, 8,529,811, 8,793,522, and 8,961,413. The Commission terminated the investigation on October 20, 2016, finding no violation and issuing no exclusion order.

Fitbit, Inc. v. BodyMedia, Inc.

final written decision / terminated
Docket:
IPR2016-00545
Filed:
2016-02-01
Terminated:
2017-07-19
Patents:8073707

Inter partes review petition by Fitbit against BodyMedia. The PTAB held claims 19, 23, and 24 of U.S. Patent 8,073,707 unpatentable in a final written decision on July 19, 2017, terminating the proceeding.

Untitled case

unverified
Docket:
16-2175
Patents:8073707

Federal Circuit appeal listed on the patent record for U.S. Patent 8,073,707. The narrative could not independently verify the underlying order or disposition.

AliphCom et al. v. Fitbit, Inc.

dismissed with prejudice
Docket:
5:15-cv-02579-HSG
Filed:
2015-06-10
Terminated:
2017-12-21

Parallel district court action by AliphCom and BodyMedia against Fitbit. The court granted Jawbone's motion to stay on Dec. 30, 2015 pending the ITC proceeding, and the case was later dismissed with prejudice by stipulated order on Dec. 21, 2017. Narrative reports this action involved the same patents/issues as ITC 337-TA-963 but could not independently confirm which of the six patents appeared in the district-court complaint.