Flextronics Sales & Marketing (A-P) Ltd. is a Mauritius-incorporated subsidiary of Flex Ltd. (NASDAQ: FLEX), the company formerly known as Flextronics International Ltd. It is registered at Level 3, Alexander House, 35 Cybercity, Ebene, Mauritius (the ITC lists a Port Louis address), and appears in Flex's annual report subsidiary lists alongside related Mauritius entities such as Flextronics Marketing (L) Ltd. and Flextronics Power Systems (Dongguan). No separate headcount, revenue, or founding date for this subsidiary is published; it is a privately held, wholly owned unit of a public parent.
Parent profile. Flex was founded in 1969 as Flextronics, Inc., is legally domiciled in Singapore and operationally headquartered in Austin, Texas, and rebranded from Flextronics to Flex in 2016. It is the world's third-largest electronics manufacturing services (EMS)/original design manufacturer by revenue, reporting roughly US$25.8 billion in FY2025 net sales with about 148,000–150,000 employees across more than 30 countries (Wikipedia; Flex FY2025 Form 10-K; FT company profile).
Operations. Flex provides end-to-end design, engineering, manufacturing, and supply-chain services to OEMs under two reporting segments, Flex Agility Solutions and Flex Reliability Solutions, serving data center/cloud, communications, automotive, healthcare, industrial, and consumer end markets. This specific subsidiary functions as a sales, marketing, and product-registration entity: it holds third-party safety certifications (e.g., TÜV Rheinland, Korea's RRA) for switching power supplies and USB-C power adapters, identifying manufacturing affiliates in Dongguan and India as producers.
Litigation posture. The tracked data show 0 cases as plaintiff and 1 as defendant — the profile of an operating company, not a patent assertion entity. The single matter is AliphCom d/b/a Jawbone & BodyMedia, Inc. v. Fitbit, Inc. et al., USITC Section 337 Investigation No. 337-TA-963 (filed July 7, 2015), in which Flextronics Sales & Marketing (A-P) Ltd. and Flextronics International Ltd. were named respondents alongside Fitbit. The complaint alleged misappropriation of trade secrets, not patent infringement. Following an August 2016 initial determination of no violation, the Commission declined review in October 2016 and terminated the investigation. The matter is not an Eastern District of Texas patent suit.