9 known cases. View patent page →
IGS filed a patent infringement suit in E.D. Tex. asserting the Lesesky-family patents 6,608,554; 6,411,203; 6,744,352; 7,015,800; and 7,449,993 against Turnpike Global Technologies and other defendants. The case closed on Aug. 2, 2010, with final judgment on Aug. 3, 2010 after all defendants settled.
IGS patent infringement action in E.D. Tex. asserting the same five Lesesky-family patents against Teletrac and others. Final judgment entered Jan. 4, 2011 after all defendants were resolved/dismissed.
IGS patent infringement action in E.D. Tex. asserting the same five Lesesky-family patents against Volvo Construction Equipment North America and others. All defendants were dismissed.
IGS patent infringement action in E.D. Tex. asserting the same five Lesesky-family patents against OnStar and others. Pending at the time of a later complaint, with one of six defendants remaining.
IGS patent infringement action in E.D. Tex. asserting the same five Lesesky-family patents against PeopleNet. Case resolved and dismissed.
IGS's sixth lawsuit asserting the same five Lesesky-family patents, filed against RM Acquisition, LLC d/b/a Rand McNally & Company. No case number was captured.
A case brought by Innovative Global Systems, LLC in the Eastern District of Texas. The narrative did not verify the defendant identities, outcome, or whether the '993 patent specifically was asserted.
Zonar Systems, Inc. filed an inter partes review petition against Innovative Global Systems, LLC. Trial was instituted on May 12, 2020, and the proceeding was terminated on August 27, 2020, on a joint motion to terminate. The narrative could not confirm whether the challenged patent was U.S. 7,449,993 or a different Lesesky/IGS patent.
Innovative Global Systems, LLC appealed a PTAB inter partes review to the Federal Circuit. The Federal Circuit affirmed in a nonprecedential judgment on June 15, 2022. The narrative could not confirm which IGS patent family member was at issue.