Defendant

Innovative Global Systems, LLC

5 cases as defendant.

Cases
5
Active
0
5 closed
Filed
2019–2020
Top venue
PTAB
1 case
Also appears as a plaintiff in 17 cases → View as plaintiff

Company profile

Innovative Global Systems, LLC (IGS) — a South Carolina limited liability company headquartered in Rock Hill, SC, with members in South Carolina and North Carolina. Per its affiliate's website, IGS was formed in 2008 by Alan C. Lesesky as an IP holding company; patent rights were transferred to it from Vehicle Enhancement Systems, Inc. (VES), a Rock Hill–based heavy-duty vehicle electronics developer Lesesky founded in 1991 and also leads as CEO. IGS is privately held; no employee counts, revenue, or funding figures are publicly disclosed, and no parent company is identified.

Operations. IGS is a patent holding and licensing entity, not an operating manufacturer. Its portfolio, largely credited to inventor Lesesky, covers vehicle-to-remote-terminal wireless data communications, driver hours-of-service (HOS) logging and compliance reporting, fuel-tax/fuel-data reporting, and tractor-trailer data systems — technology it licensed to telematics vendors, historically on per-unit royalties (e.g., the 2007 and 2011 Zonar license agreements). Associated operating activity sits at VES, which provides R&D and engineering services in tractor/trailer electronics. Unified Patents' PTAB database classifies IGS as an NPE patent owner.

Litigation posture. Predominantly a plaintiff-asserting licensor: 18 tracked cases as plaintiff versus 5 as defendant, and every "defendant" entry is a PTAB inter partes review petition filed by an accused infringer, not a district-court suit against IGS. The 2009–2011 wave — Turnpike Global, Teletrac, OnStar, PeopleNet, Volvo Construction Equipment, Rand McNally — clustered in the Eastern District of Texas (Tyler Division); later suits against Zonar, NexTraq, Blue Tree Systems, Keep Truckin, and Samsara moved to D.S.C., N.D. Ga., and D. Del.

Notable matters. IGS v. Zonar (D.S.C. 2018) was a royalty/breach dispute after Continental AG's acquisition of Zonar and Zonar's halt of payments; Zonar countered with IPRs. IGS v. Keep Truckin (Motive) produced IPR2020-00694 (all challenged claims of U.S. 10,157,384 held unpatentable) and a Federal Circuit appeal, No. 2021-2289, affirmed June 15, 2022.

Filing activity

2019: 3 cases3'192020: 2 cases'20
Cases filed per year naming Innovative Global Systems, LLC as defendant.

Keep Truckin, Inc. v. Innovative Global Systems, LLC

final written decision; all challenged claims unpatentable
Docket:
IPR2020-00694
Filed:
2020-03-10
Terminated:
2021-07-21
Patents:10157384

Keep Truckin petitioned for inter partes review of U.S. 10,157,384. The Board instituted review of claims 1-11 and 14-20 and held all challenged claims unpatentable in its final written decision on July 21, 2021.

Zonar Systems, Inc. v. Innovative Global Systems, LLC

settled
Docket:
IPR2020-00155
Filed:
2019-11-19
Terminated:
2020-08-27
Patents:7102494

Inter partes review petition filed by Zonar Systems against Innovative Global Systems challenging U.S. Patent 7,102,494. The parties filed a joint motion to terminate based on settlement, and the PTAB terminated the proceeding on August 27, 2020 without a final written decision.

Zonar Systems, Inc. v. Innovative Global Systems, LLC

settled
Docket:
IPR2020-00154
Filed:
2019-11-19
Terminated:
2020-08-27
Patents:6946953

Inter partes review filed by Zonar Systems against Innovative Global Systems challenging U.S. Patent No. 6,946,953. The PTAB instituted review on May 12, 2020, and terminated the proceeding by settlement on August 27, 2020 before a final written decision.

Zonar Systems, Inc. v. Innovative Global Systems, LLC

terminated
Docket:
IPR2020-00154
Filed:
2019-11-19
Terminated:
2020-08-27
Patents:7449993

Zonar Systems, Inc. filed an inter partes review petition against Innovative Global Systems, LLC. Trial was instituted on May 12, 2020, and the proceeding was terminated on August 27, 2020, on a joint motion to terminate. The narrative could not confirm whether the challenged patent was U.S. 7,449,993 or a different Lesesky/IGS patent.