7161561

5 known cases. View patent page →

Cases: 5
Active: 0; 5 closed
Filed: 2011–2013
Top venue: ITC; 2 cases

Filing activity

Cases asserting US Patent 7161561 filed per year.

Furuno Electric Co., Ltd. et al. v. Honeywell International Inc. et al.

settled

Docket:: 337-TA-810
Court:: U.S. International Trade Commission
Filed:: 2011-09-30
Terminated:: 2012-03-13

Patents:7161561

π Furuno Electric Co., Ltd.π Furuno U.S.A., Inc.Δ Honeywell International Inc.Δ Skyforce Avionics Ltd.

ITC investigation concerning certain navigation products, components thereof, and related software. Furuno named Honeywell and Skyforce as respondents and asserted the '561 patent (claim 8), among other patents. The investigation was terminated on March 13, 2012, based on a settlement agreement.

Furuno Electric Co., Ltd. v. Honeywell International Inc. et al.

dismissed

Docket:: 3:11-cv-01196
Court:: U.S. District Court for the District of Oregon, Portland Division
Filed:: 2011-09-30
Terminated:: 2012-02-09

Patents:7161561

π Furuno Electric Co., Ltd.Δ Honeywell International Inc.Δ Skyforce Avionics Ltd.

Furuno sued Honeywell and Skyforce in the District of Oregon. Count IV asserted the '561 patent against Honeywell's vehicle display devices, such as Honeywell Primus Epic. The case was dismissed on February 9, 2012, after a settlement covering both the district court case and the related ITC matter.

Furuno Electric Co., Ltd. et al. v. Garmin Ltd. et al.

settled

Docket:: 337-TA-900
Court:: U.S. International Trade Commission
Filed:: 2013-09-23
Terminated:: 2014-09-22

Patents:7161561

π Furuno Electric Co., Ltd.π Furuno U.S.A., Inc.Δ Garmin Ltd.Δ Garmin International, Inc.Δ Garmin North America, Inc.Δ Garmin USA, Inc.Δ Navico Holding AS Δ Navico UK Limited Δ Navico Inc.Δ Raymarine, Inc.Δ Raymarine UK Ltd.

ITC investigation concerning certain navigation products, including GPS devices, navigation and display systems, radar systems, navigational aids, mapping systems, and related software. Furuno named Garmin, Navico, and Raymarine respondents and asserted the '561 patent (claims 1–10, 12, 14), among other patents. The investigation was terminated in its entirety on September 22, 2014, based on settlements with each respondent.

Furuno Electric Co., Ltd. et al. v. Navico Holding AS et al.

settled

Docket:: 3:13-cv-01684
Court:: U.S. District Court for the District of Oregon

Patents:7161561

π Furuno Electric Co., Ltd.π Furuno U.S.A., Inc.Δ Navico Holding AS Δ Navico UK Limited Δ Navico, Inc.

Furuno sued Navico entities in the District of Oregon; the '561 patent was among the asserted patents. The case was concluded by settlement, with the parallel ITC matter settled in April 2014.

Furuno Electric Co., Ltd. et al. v. Raymarine UK Limited et al.

settled

Docket:: 3:13-cv-01687
Court:: U.S. District Court for the District of Oregon

Patents:7161561

π Furuno Electric Co., Ltd.π Furuno U.S.A., Inc.Δ Raymarine UK Limited Δ Raymarine, Inc.

Furuno sued Raymarine entities in the District of Oregon; the '561 patent was among the asserted patents. The case was concluded by settlement, with the parallel ITC matter settled in August–September 2014.