I'll research this company to verify the profile details.
Raymarine, Inc. is the U.S. operating entity of Raymarine, a marine-electronics brand whose roots trace to 1923, when the Submarine Signal Company (later merged into Raytheon) introduced a commercial echosounder. The Raymarine brand itself was created in 2001 through a management buyout of Raytheon's marine division, backed by private-equity firm Hg; the company listed on the London Stock Exchange in 2004, entered administration in 2010, and was acquired by FLIR Systems for roughly $180 million that May. Since Teledyne Technologies' (NYSE: TDY) 2021 acquisition of FLIR, Raymarine has operated as a brand within Teledyne FLIR's maritime group. The brand's principal offices and R&D are in Fareham/Portsmouth, Hampshire, UK; the U.S. entity has been listed at 9 Townsend West, Nashua, New Hampshire. Third-party data providers (PitchBook, Crustdata) estimate roughly 430–460 employees globally; Kona Equity lists revenue near $62 million. These private-company figures are estimates, not audited disclosures.
Products. Raymarine designs and sells marine electronics for recreational boating and light commercial marine markets: multifunction navigation displays and chartplotters (Axiom, Element), autopilots (Evolution), radar (Pathfinder, solid-state/CHIRP), sonar and fishfinders, AIS and VHF communications, thermal and visible cameras, LightHouse chart cards and navigation software, and augmented-reality/docking-assist systems. Production is largely outsourced; the company focuses on design, marketing, sales, and service, and reports U.S. Coast Guard vessels among its users.
Litigation posture. Raymarine is an operating company, not a patent assertion entity. Across the two tracked matters it appears exclusively as a defendant (0 plaintiff, 0 defendant-as-complainant actions), consistent with a product manufacturer defending its market rather than asserting patents.
Notable cases. Both tracked suits arise from a single September 23, 2013 complaint by Furuno Electric Co., Ltd. and Furuno U.S.A., Inc.: Furuno Electric Co. v. Raymarine UK Limited et al. in the U.S. District Court for the District of Oregon, and the parallel ITC Section 337 investigation (Inv. No. 337-TA-900, Certain Navigation Products). Furuno asserted four patents (U.S. 6,084,565; 6,424,292; 7,161,561; 7,768,447) covering navigation, radar, and map-display systems, naming Raymarine alongside Garmin and Navico as respondents. The Oregon venue reflects Furuno's U.S. operations rather than a plaintiff-friendly Texas forum.