Defendant

Honeywell International Inc.

2 cases as defendant.

Cases
2
Active
0
2 closed
Filed
2011
Top venue
ITC
1 case

Company profile

Honeywell International Inc. (NASDAQ: HON; commonly "Honeywell") is a publicly traded U.S. industrial technology company headquartered at 855 South Mint Street, Charlotte, North Carolina. The Honeywell brand dates to 1906; the current Delaware corporation was incorporated in 1985 and took its present form through the 1999 AlliedSignal–Honeywell merger. Per its FY2025 Form 10-K, Honeywell employed about 101,000 people and reported sales of roughly $37.4 billion. It is a standalone public company, not a subsidiary or shell; market capitalization has run in the $130–140 billion range in 2026.

Operations span four reported segments in 2025: Aerospace Technologies (aircraft propulsion, cockpit and navigation systems, auxiliary power); Building Automation (fire, access/security, controls and building-management hardware/software); Industrial Automation (sensors, smart edge devices, warehouse and workflow automation); and Energy and Sustainability Solutions (process technology, catalysts, refining/petrochemical technologies). Two separations are underway: Solstice Advanced Materials was spun off on October 30, 2025, and Aerospace Technologies is slated to separate into an independent public company in 2026.

Patent-litigation posture: an operating company defending, not asserting. Honeywell is a defendant in both tracked cases and a plaintiff in none — the profile of a large product-selling manufacturer being attacked, not an NPE. Neither venue is a notorious plaintiff-friendly district: one is a U.S. International Trade Commission Section 337 investigation, the other a District of Oregon (Portland Division) action.

Notable cases: Furuno Electric Co., Ltd. v. Honeywell International Inc. (D. Or.; ITC Inv. No. 337-TA-810), both filed 2011-09-30. Furuno, a Japanese marine-electronics manufacturer, asserted four patents (U.S. 6,084,565; 7,095,367; 7,089,094; 7,161,561) against Honeywell and its U.K. subsidiary Skyforce Avionics Ltd.; the USITC described the accused products as aircraft and helicopter heading/position navigation displays. The filings followed Honeywell's own 2009 Minnesota district court suit and June 2011 ITC complaint (337-TA-783) against Furuno over GPS navigation patents, making this part of a two-way navigation-IP dispute; only the Furuno-filed actions appear in this database.

Furuno Electric Co., Ltd. et al. v. Honeywell International Inc. et al.

settled
Docket:
337-TA-810
Filed:
2011-09-30
Terminated:
2012-03-13
Patents:7161561

ITC investigation concerning certain navigation products, components thereof, and related software. Furuno named Honeywell and Skyforce as respondents and asserted the '561 patent (claim 8), among other patents. The investigation was terminated on March 13, 2012, based on a settlement agreement.

Furuno Electric Co., Ltd. v. Honeywell International Inc. et al.

dismissed
Docket:
3:11-cv-01196
Filed:
2011-09-30
Terminated:
2012-02-09
Patents:7161561

Furuno sued Honeywell and Skyforce in the District of Oregon. Count IV asserted the '561 patent against Honeywell's vehicle display devices, such as Honeywell Primus Epic. The case was dismissed on February 9, 2012, after a settlement covering both the district court case and the related ITC matter.