16 known cases. View patent page →
Lead consolidated 2017 Central District of California case asserting the '231 patent along with U.S. 7,062,296 and 7,729,728. It was stayed for IPRs and the '231 claims were held invalid via collateral estoppel.
2017 Central District of California case asserting the '231 patent along with U.S. 7,062,296 and 7,729,728. It was consolidated and stayed, then resolved via the indefiniteness/collateral-estoppel path.
2017 Central District of California case asserting the '231 patent along with U.S. 7,062,296 and 7,729,728. It was dismissed with prejudice by stipulation pursuant to a confidential settlement agreement.
2017 Central District of California case asserting the '231 patent along with U.S. 7,062,296 and 7,729,728. It was consolidated and stayed, and was covered by the invalidity/collateral-estoppel resolution.
2017 Central District of California case asserting the '231 patent along with U.S. 7,062,296 and 7,729,728. It was consolidated and stayed, resolved via the indefiniteness/collateral-estoppel path, and was subject to CAFC 22-1787/22-1789.
2017 Central District of California case asserting the '231 patent along with U.S. 7,062,296 and 7,729,728. Final judgment was entered for Cisco on April 15, 2022, on the pleadings of invalidity of the '231 patent based on collateral estoppel from the N.D. Cal. indefiniteness judgment.
2017 Central District of California case asserting the '231 patent along with U.S. 7,062,296 and 7,729,728. Final judgment was entered for Extreme Networks on April 15, 2022, on the same collateral-estoppel basis.
2017 Central District of California case asserting the '231 patent along with U.S. 7,062,296 and 7,729,728. It was consolidated and stayed, then resolved via the indefiniteness/collateral-estoppel path.
2017 Central District of California case asserting the '231 patent along with U.S. 7,062,296 and 7,729,728. It was consolidated and stayed, and was superseded by the N.D. Cal. action No. 3:18-cv-01992.
2017 Central District of California case asserting the '231 patent along with U.S. 7,062,296 and 7,729,728. It was consolidated and stayed, then resolved via the indefiniteness/collateral-estoppel path.
2017 Southern District of California case listed in the Stanford NPE Litigation Database and identified as part of the wave asserting the '231 patent along with U.S. 7,062,296 and 7,729,728; outcomes were not confirmed in the retrieved records.
N.D. Cal. action before Judge William H. Orrick by XR Communications/Vivato against Ruckus. The complaint attached exhibits for the '296, '728, and '231 patents; the court entered a final judgment of indefiniteness as to the '231 patent claims, which was later given collateral-estoppel effect.
N.D. Cal. docket listed among Google Patents' litigation entries for the '296 patent. The parties and outcome could not be verified from the retrieved sources.
Appeal by XR Communications from the consolidated C.D. Cal. judgment against D-Link and co-defendants. The nonprecedential opinion addressed claims 1-9 and 12 of the '231 patent as invalid for indefiniteness, resting on the N.D. Cal. judgment's collateral estoppel effect.
Appeal by XR Communications from the C.D. Cal. final judgment in the Extreme Networks action. The appeal was terminated with the lower decision standing ('AFFIRMED'/appeal dismissed).
Appeal by XR Communications against Asustek Computer, Inc., from the consolidated C.D. Cal. judgment. It was filed May 13, 2022, closed May 18, 2023, and recorded as 'Appeal Dismissed'; three patents including the '296 patent were asserted.