3 known cases. View patent page →
In equity. Asserted patents were Gray 222,895, Dowling 289,518, and Marmon 274,508. US 265,927 was not asserted; the court relied on it as anticipatory prior art against Marmon 274,508. Decree for plaintiff on the Gray patent; bill dismissed as to the Dowling and Marmon patents.
Equity suit in which U.S. Patent No. 289,518 (Dowling) was held invalid for want of invention and the bill was dismissed as to the Dowling and Marmon patents. Only the Gray patent (No. 222,895), claims 2–5, was sustained; an ancillary motion to stay the injunction pending appeal (39 F. 803) was denied.
Related suit against the maker of the mill accused in Coombs, on the same four patents asserted in the Michigan case. The reported opinion addresses only the Gray patent, and the motion for preliminary injunction was denied on bond; Dowling 289,518's presence in the asserted set is not expressly confirmed in the report.