10761791

7 known cases. View patent page →

Cases
7
Active
1
6 closed
Filed
2021–2026
Top venue
W.D. Tennessee Memphis
1 case

Filing activity

2021: 1 case1'212022: 1 case'22'23'24'252026: 1 case'26
Cases asserting US Patent 10761791 filed per year.

Flexiworld Technologies, Inc. v. Brothers Industries (U.S.A.), Inc.

settled; consent judgment entered with prejudice
Docket:
2:22-cv-02237
Filed:
2022-04-15
Terminated:
2023-03-13

Flexiworld sued Brother in the Western District of Tennessee, asserting the '402 patent along with other Flexiworld patents. The case was resolved by consent judgment with prejudice on March 13, 2023, with terms not public.

Flexiworld Technologies, Inc. v. Xerox Corporation

dismissed with prejudice
Docket:
6:23-cv-06371

Flexiworld sued Xerox in the Western District of New York. The parties stipulated to dismissal of all claims and counterclaims with prejudice under Rule 41(a)(1)(A)(ii), each side bearing its own costs/fees, without any Markman ruling, validity determination, or infringement finding.

Flexiworld Technologies, Inc. v. Canon, Inc. et al.

voluntarily dismissed with prejudice
Docket:
6:21-cv-00143-ADA
Filed:
2021-02-11
Terminated:
2021-08-26
Patents:10761791

Flexiworld sued Canon and Canon Solutions America in Judge Albright's Waco court. Flexiworld filed a Notice of Voluntary Dismissal under Rule 41(a)(1)(A)(i) on August 26, 2021, before Canon answered.

Flexiworld Technologies, Inc. v. Lexmark International, Inc.

motion to dismiss denied in part; outcome unconfirmed
Docket:
5:22-cv-00097
Patents:10761791

Flexiworld's first action against Lexmark proceeded through the motion-to-dismiss stage; the court denied Lexmark's motion in part, including rejecting Lexmark's § 287(a) marking arguments. Final outcome was not confirmed in the sources retrieved.

Flexiworld Technologies, Inc. v. TCL Electronics Holdings Ltd. et al.

newly filed
Docket:
2:2026cv00229
Filed:
2026-03-20
Patents:10761791

Flexiworld filed suit against TCL entities in the Eastern District of Texas before Judge Gilstrap; summons returned executed in April 2026. The docket summary retrieved did not show which specific patents are asserted, so inclusion of the '791 patent is unconfirmed.