Defendant

University Patents, Inc.

1 case as defendant.

Cases
1
Active
0
1 closed
Filed
1986
Top venue
D. Delaware
1 case

Company profile

Let me dig deeper into this entity's corporate history and its patent-enforcement activity.

University Patents, Inc. ("UPI")

Company overview. UPI was a Stamford, Connecticut patent-licensing company. It was formed in 1964 inside the University of Illinois system to commercialize patentable faculty research, then spun out as a public company quoted over the counter; by the mid-1970s it represented roughly half a dozen universities and was run by L. William Miles, a former IBM director of commercial development. A November 1976 New York Times report listed its shares in the high $20s. For the fiscal year ended July 31, 1976, it reported operating income of $300,000 (13 cents per share) on combined licensing and subsidiary revenue. Current ownership, headcount, and legal status could not be verified; the company does not appear to operate under this name today. (A 1930s Columbia University non-profit and a 2000s startup plan using the same name are unrelated entities.)

Products / services. UPI did not make the technologies it monetized; it licensed university-held patents and sublicensed rights to industry. Its portfolio was diversified: display electronics (a "plasma display matrix" licensed to IBM with $1 million in advance royalties), food science (a soy-based liquid food licensed to Beatrice Foods and Bristol-Myers), and later biotechnology and analytical-instrumentation patents. Its only manufacturing operation was Regal Rugs Inc., a wholly owned rug subsidiary that generated the bulk of revenue — FY1976 patent royalties were $355,000, a $307,000 loss.

Patent-litigation posture. UPI operated as a non-practicing licensing and enforcement entity: it asserted patents it did not practice, on behalf of university clients, and pressed industry-wide licensing campaigns. Its only tracked database appearance is defensive (0 plaintiff / 1 defendant), but that reflects the specific procedural vehicle rather than its overall posture — the tracked suit was a declaratory-judgment action filed against UPI after it threatened litigation, while UPI itself filed infringement actions in the Northern District of California against other firms, including Biosyntech GmbH. This is a 1980s-era dispute, predating the modern Eastern District of Texas assertion era.

Notable case. Millipore Corp. et al. v. University Patents, Inc. (D. Del., filed Aug. 29, 1986): Millipore sought a declaration of non-infringement after UPI and licensee ABIO offered a take-it-or-leave-it sublicense backed by a stated threat of suit. The court denied UPI's motions to dismiss and to transfer venue to California (682 F. Supp. 227).

Millipore Corp. et al. v. University Patents, Inc.

jurisdictional motion addressed
Filed:
1986-08-29

Millipore Corp., later joined by Biosyntech GmbH, filed a declaratory-judgment action against University Patents, Inc. in the District of Delaware arising from UPI's assertion/licensing of its oligonucleotide-synthesis patent portfolio, including U.S. 4,458,066 and U.S. 4,500,707. UPI moved to dismiss for lack of subject-matter jurisdiction; the motion was addressed, but the underlying merits were not confirmed.