Defendant

Nomadix, Inc.

5 cases as defendant.

Cases: 5
Active: 0; 5 closed
Filed: 2004–2015
Top venue: S.D. California; 1 case

Also appears as a plaintiff in 11 cases → View as plaintiff

Hospitality Core Services, LLC v. Nomadix, Inc.

terminated by settlement

Docket:: IPR2016-00092
Court:: USPTO Patent Trial and Appeal Board (PTAB), Alexandria, VA
Filed:: 2015-10-27
Terminated:: 2016-07-27

Patents:8364806

π Hospitality Core Services, LLC Δ Nomadix, Inc.

Hospitality Core Services, LLC filed an inter partes review petition against Nomadix, Inc. challenging U.S. Patent No. 8,364,806. The PTAB instituted review on May 5, 2016, and terminated the proceeding on July 27, 2016, after the parties settled.

IP3 Networks, Inc. v. Nomadix, Inc.

unknown

Docket:: 3:04-cv-01485
Court:: U.S. District Court, Southern District of California
Filed:: 2004-07-23

Patents:6636894

π IP3 Networks, Inc.Δ Nomadix, Inc.

Declaratory-judgment action for non-infringement and invalidity of U.S. Patent No. 6,636,894, plus state claims. Nomadix counterclaimed; final disposition not confirmed.

iBAHN General Holdings Corporation v. Nomadix, Inc.

unknown

Docket:: 2:11-cv-02604
Court:: U.S. District Court, Central District of California

Patents:6636894

π iBAHN General Holdings Corporation Δ Nomadix, Inc.

iBAHN General Holdings Corporation brought a case involving the '894 patent against Nomadix. Final disposition not confirmed.

Hospitality Core Services, LLC v. Nomadix, Inc.

not instituted

Docket:: IPR2016-00052
Court:: U.S. Patent and Trademark Office, Patent Trial and Appeal Board

Patents:6636894

π Hospitality Core Services, LLC Δ Nomadix, Inc.

Hospitality Core Services, LLC petitioned for inter partes review of U.S. Patent No. 6,636,894. The Board did not institute the petition on the merits.

Hospitality Core Services, LLC v. Nomadix, Inc.

terminated by settlement

Docket:: IPR2016-00081
Court:: USPTO Patent Trial and Appeal Board (IPR)

Patents:8266269

π Hospitality Core Services, LLC Δ Nomadix, Inc.

Blueprint RF petitioned for inter partes review of U.S. Patent No. 8,266,269 in parallel with the district court case. The IPR was terminated by settlement.