Lotus Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd. (Chinese: 美時化學製藥股份有限公司; "Lotus") is a publicly listed specialty and generic pharmaceutical company headquartered at 17F, No. 277 Song Ren Road, Xinyi District, Taipei City, Taiwan. Founded in 1966, it trades on the Taiwan Stock Exchange under ticker 1795 (listing date 2019-12-16). It is majority-owned by the Alvogen Group, which invested via private placement in 2014; Lotus in turn completed the acquisition of New Alvogen Group Holdings (Alvogen) in December 2025. Reported headcount is roughly 1,100–1,400 globally depending on source. FY2025 consolidated revenue was NT$20,509 million (~US$650M) with basic EPS of NT$18.14; 1H2026 revenue was NT$17,453 million following Alvogen consolidation.
Lotus develops, manufactures, in-licenses and commercializes medicines, with a portfolio of 250+ commercial products sold across 90+ markets. Core therapeutic areas include oncology and immunology (including lenalidomide, gefitinib, vinorelbine softgel capsules, and lurbinectedin/Zepzelca in Taiwan), CNS, cardiovascular, women's health and anti-obesity products, primarily in tablet and hard/softgel capsule form. It also provides contract manufacturing and contract research services. It operates manufacturing sites in Taiwan, the United States and South Korea, with R&D hubs in India and the United States, and states it runs a Taiwan facility approved by the US FDA, EU EMA and Japan PMDA.
Patent-litigation posture: Lotus appears in the database exclusively as a defendant (0 plaintiff cases, 4 defendant cases). That profile is consistent with an operating company defending ANDA/Hatch-Waxman challenges brought by brand manufacturers, not a patent assertion entity.
Notable cases: All four tracked matters are Celgene Corporation suits filed against Lotus in the U.S. District Court for the District of New Jersey — two dated 2017-09-06 (one before Judge Wigenton) and one dated 2018-07-10, with a fourth undated. The D.N.J. venue and Celgene counterparty align with lenalidomide (Revlimid) generic-entry litigation. The merits of those cases are not assessed here.